SG

Seth Grossman

Commissioner, Planning Commission · 55 remarks on the record · Last spoke Sep 17, 2026

Irvine, CA

Hear Grossman say it

From 55 remarks on the record: the newest that say more than procedure, each playing at its second in the meeting.

  • “Were there economically feasible alternatives that would generate a higher unit count and help the city to meet its density?”

    Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026

  • “Published on the website. OK, so if I'm a nearby resident or, you know, or tenant or How would I know if I wasn't regularly on a daily browsing the website?”

    Planning Commission · Aug 6, 2026

  • “The revised private street design that the applicant and the party have amicably agreed to as the only substantive change from June 18th?”

    Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026

  • “Do my fellow commissioners have any comments or we want to vote? Just for the record, I have had a chance to review the meeting and I will be able to vote on the consent calendar.”

    Planning Commission · Jun 18, 2026

  • “Steph, can I ask a question? Do we, as a part of our review, look at any of those alternatives, or do we simply make a binary determination that 50 is economically infeasible?”

    Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026

  • “With all the, that feels inadequate if I were, because I acknowledge that they probably aren't controversial, but if someone was doing something either near my home or near my business, I kind of would like to have an easier way of knowing.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 6, 2026

All 55 remarks

Follow the Irvine Planning Commission with Hamlet for business

Alerts when your issues come up at its meetings, and every transcript in full.

See Hamlet for business

Meetings they spoke at · 4

Sources: cityofirvine.gov · records through Sep 17, 2026

Report a problem

Seth Grossman · Hamlet City Index