Remarks by Scott A. Wehrli

128 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 4 of 6

  1. Play at 34:20

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  2. Play at 35:44
    “All those in favor sign aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion passes 8-0. May I have a motion to approve the consent agenda removing I-1, I-9, I-11, and I-12.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  3. Play at 36:08

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  4. Play at 37:47
    “WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THE COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA AS READ. ROLL CALL.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  5. Play at 42:34

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  6. Play at 43:04
    “Councilman McBroom. I'm fine. All right. Is there a motion to approve the regular city council minutes of the August 18th, 2026 meeting? Councilman White.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  7. Play at 43:28
    “We have a motion and a second on I-1. Roll call.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  8. Play at 53:12
    “WE DO HAVE THE PETITIONER ATTORNEY FOR QUESTIONS ONLY FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS. ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE QUESTIONS?”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  9. Play at 55:07
    “So I guess I've got a little concern about the way this is put together at this point. Number one, the interest rate that is assigned to it, 2% or whatever it is per year for the extent of the deal, but how this would be potentially recorded on the affected party's properties. Are you referring to this as, is this like a lien or is this a... memorandum of conditional recapture, or how is this going to look on a title search for these properties? And I'll refer to...”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  10. Play at 59:32
    “So the answer to the question is it's not a lien, it's a memorandum of conditional recapture.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  11. Play at 59:46
    “Anything? Okay. Is there a reason, and I'll direct this to our legal staff, is there a reason that we can't tie this to what I believe the spirit of what we're trying to do here is? And that would be if homeowners ever choose to sell their home and the buyer of that home someday decides to tear the house down and build something different, why couldn't we tie this to the demolition permit and the building permit and make it very clear that there's no dollars that are being sought from the current owners based upon the current use, or if they sell the homes in their current condition to…”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  12. Play at 1:00:47

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  13. Play at 1:02:40

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  14. Play at 1:04:08
    “Is there a second? I made the motion, so I need a second, please.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  15. Play at 1:05:22

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  16. Play at 1:05:36
    “And there will be no effects on the current owners for the time that they have until such time as they sell the house and somebody chooses to tear it down?”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  17. Play at 1:07:02
    “Motion fails, 1-7. Or I'm sorry, yeah, 1-7. Aye, 11.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  18. Play at 1:07:39
    “And if you heard your name called, please move to the front row. We do have several speakers on this topic. Thank you.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  19. Play at 1:21:01
    “Okay. Council, there is another speaker who arrived at 6.20 and apparently drove a couple hours to testify here tonight and was not aware of our sign-up rules. I would need a council action by a voice vote to determine whether or not we want to allow him to speak. All those in favor?”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  20. Play at 1:22:12
    “So is there a motion to allow the speaker who didn't sign up prior to 6.30 to speak? Seeing none. Councilman White, you want to make the motion?”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  21. Play at 1:22:36
    “Is there a second? Councilman Holzer? Second, Holzer. We have a motion and a second. All those in favor, sign aye. Not very loud. So let's do a division here. Let's do a roll call vote.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  22. Play at 1:23:13
    “Okay. Let's do a quick roll call vote just to make sure we got it right.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  23. Play at 1:26:39
    “Thank you. Any more speakers? Seeing none, council discussion. Councilwoman Jane.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  24. Play at 1:34:42
    “Thank you. I want to thank, I'm sorry, Councilman White.”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

  25. Play at 1:43:29
    “I want to thank everyone who was engaged on this. You've been heard and you are all part of the public record. The mayor's office and the city council has received impassioned communications on both sides of this issue. And I do not doubt the sincerity of anyone who's testified at the liquor commission or before this council, or even back before the city council in 2019. But our charge here is the health, the safety and the welfare of this community, our families and our young people. And we've heard from neighbors who bravely shared what happened to them, A product marketed as natural and…”

    City Council · Sep 1, 2026

Back to Scott A. Wehrli’s profile