Remarks by Ryan Seacrist

42 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 2

  1. Play at 53:32
    “All right, thank you. Yeah, and just general comment. I mean, I think I'm in alignment with everything discussed today. I think the important thing would be that if the developer would like to consider an alternative to the staff conditions for approval, you'll need to submit your own traffic analysis that proves that out and shows that the alternative would be effective. And lastly, I would say, as we discussed up here, We wouldn't want there to be a scenario where you're depending on another developer to put in a traffic signal that you're depending on for approval. So we would want some…”

    Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026

  2. Play at 57:39
    “Sorry, I'm trying to scan to see if, you know, they can submit a report and that report could say that they could remove the decel lane if it were to come up with results that indicate that. It doesn't mention anything about the signal, of course, as that's not in their control unless they install it. But if the report, of course, does say a traffic signal would allow them to remove the decel lane, I think we would still want to know that that. light is in place prior to them opening their site for use, in my opinion.”

    Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026

  3. Play at 59:24
    “We have another comment from former Bastion.”

    Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026

  4. Play at 1:00:02
    “Sure. Agreed. And I don't think it's dependent. Surely they could build a signal if they'd like to. You know what I mean? The point is a signal needs to be in place if they were to leverage that. But they can go ahead with their analysis and if the analysis says that a signal could replace the need for the D cell lane, still the signal's got to be in place, right?”

    Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026

  5. Play at 1:00:38
    “I think we're saying the same thing, just in a different way. So I agree with you.”

    Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026

  6. Play at 1:01:39
    “I understand. Thank you for the clarity. Any additional questions, comments, motions?”

    Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026

  7. Play at 1:01:58
    “All right, we have a motion from Board Member Bastian. Do we have a second?”

    Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026

  8. Play at 1:02:03
    “Second from Board Member Moreno. All those in favor, please unmute your mic and say aye. Aye. Any opposed? I asked your name. I was like, thank you. All right, and that completes our agenda for the day. We do not have any appeals updates. So with that, we will adjourn the meeting at 10.03 p.m. Thank you.”

    Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026

  9. Play at 0:30
    “Good morning, everyone. Get started here. We are glad you have joined us for today's meeting. The Municipal Planning Board, or MPB, is an advisory board to City Council comprised of citizen members who voluntarily and without compensation devote their time and talents to a variety of zoning and land development issues in the community. All MPB recommendations are subject to final action by City Council. We anticipate the minutes of today's meeting will be presented at the City Council meeting on September 14, 2026 for approval of the recommended actions. Any person desiring to appeal a…”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  10. Play at 3:56
    “Thank you, sir. And with that, we'll call the meeting to order at 9.02 a.m. To get started, let's please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  11. Play at 4:27
    “All right, we'll open up with a consideration of the July 21st, 2026 meeting minutes and any motion to waive the reading. We have an approval and a second. All those in favor, please unmute your mic and say aye. Aye. Any opposed? And the minutes pass unanimously. Thank you. If the MPB is not adjourned for the day or voted to take an earlier lunch break, the Board will complete the agenda item being reviewed as of 1230 p.m. and will pause for a half-hour lunch break at the conclusion of that item. In accordance with Section 286.0114 Florida Statutes, any member of the public can be heard on…”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  12. Play at 8:03
    “All right. Thank you very much. Before we get started on a vote, does anyone have a conflict to declare? All right. Seeing none, we can open up for any discussion on the consent agenda or motion.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  13. Play at 8:36
    “Thank you. Motion from board member Jackson.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  14. Play at 8:44

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  15. Play at 9:38
    “All right. Do we have any nominations for vice chair? I'm going to put one in for board member Kendrick Schrader. We can collect any additional as well. I'll second that if it needs to be.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  16. Play at 10:22
    “All right, I'll put it up a motion to accept board member Carrie read as chair. All those in need a second. Sorry.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  17. Play at 10:39

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

Back to Ryan Seacrist’s profile