Remarks by Rollin Horton

8 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1

  1. Play at 42:03

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  2. Play at 42:49
    “Thank you. Thank you. So if there's anything proposed to rezone this, that's something that the community and the district council member would still have control over if and when that's proposed.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  3. Play at 51:48
    “Thank you, chair. Um, I appreciate all the staff's work on this and the analysis. And I think the substitute is a significant improvement over the bill as filed. I did have a couple lingering concerns, even with the substituted version. And I think the first one is, I think while the staff analysis knows that the two uses, which would be bifurcated as a result of the substitute are treated consistently under title 17, my read of the substitute, and please tell me if this is wrong, is that it retains for a child, the permit prioritization that the council recently passed in, in earlier this…”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  4. Play at 52:44
    “Got it. I mean, it's okay. I just thinking this through because we're, I guess we're issuing a recommendation, which affects the bill as a whole, even though only a part of it is with our review here. I guess my concerns are on the good things that this bill does. Is it. directs the reader towards state or childcare ones, which are consistent. The downsides are, I view as at duplicates the amount of texts and complexity that we're adding on these, even if they're treated consistently. And then even if it's outside the scope of our review removes the permit prioritization that the council only…”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  5. Play at 57:48
    “I guess I can speak to that. Earlier this summer, Council Member Capp sponsored legislation that the council approved unanimously, which requires, and staff, I guess it's not Title 17, but correct me if I'm wrong, requires permit applications for daycare uses, which currently includes both childcare and adult daycare, to be prioritized for approval consistent with affordable housing. This bill would undo that for adult daycare services.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  6. Play at 1:00:06
    “Yeah, this would amend that title and remove the prioritization for adult...”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  7. Play at 1:00:15
    “Yeah, this legislation, I guess we're only considering a portion of the legislation here.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  8. Play at 1:03:36
    “Thank you. Any other discussion? Councilman? I appreciate that clarification from council. And I think in that one, viewing the implications that the title scene, title 17 aspect has on title two and vice versa, the implications of removing the permit prioritization have on the effect of actual ability to bring daycare services online, which is squarely in title 17. I think adult daycares are very important service. And we've just made some very painful progress to, to increase access to those. And, I don't want to see this body walk back any of the progress we recently made. So I'll, I think…”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

Back to Rollin Horton’s profile