Remarks by Robert Vanderpool
80 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 4 of 4
- Play at 1:09:10
“Because what I was trying to say is that it's layered, and Paul has mentioned that, and it's making sure that we're able to have both conversations will inform each other as we're able to look through it, because I even wrote down geographic, right? If it turns out that we are able to go through the taxes and find where these are, it may tell us more of a detailed breakdown of what's going on in soft capital, for example. So, yeah. Do you have everything you need from us?”
Planning Commission · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 1:09:59
“I think we're on to reports and updates, and I believe, Tim, you have something for us. I have a couple things.”
Planning Commission · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 1:22:53
“I'm on my reason to hand myself. Um, so, uh, yeah, I would be interested in it coming back as a document. I think that would be, uh, uh, that, that meets both the, the feedback you're giving us. And, uh, it, it, for the folks that are every app advocate in this community around this, they want to make sure that we're not pulling a fast one. We're making sure that we're listening to their concerns. Um, and then, uh, I also am interested in the pre-sub level so that before there's an architectural design of the site, I think that that is a way of thinking about it in both ways. I wrote this…”
Planning Commission · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 1:26:34
“I'd be interested in more of that in the future when it comes back. Because it reminds me of a pre-zoning world where, oh, this is here, but I don't want to get rid of it, so I'm just going to kind of build around, like kind of a different way of thinking. A very sometimes risky, sometimes rewarding way of doing things.”
Planning Commission · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 1:33:11
“Well, last item, and I just want to, if we still have the contact for the folks who public commented on the tree work last month, just to notify them that this is coming back up.”
Planning Commission · Jul 23, 2026