Remarks by Nate Bulmon
20 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
- Play at 35:31
“if anything with the interchange getting moved up it's even closer they they always knew that they were going to be tracking ahead of that i had a question for sam real quick i know that legislation was introduced relatively recently that correct me if i'm wrong that precludes cities from asking for voluntary off-site improvements but this is that accurate I'm fine to be wrong.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 36:12
“But because this was done prior, that wouldn't have any effect on this, correct? I just wanted to make sure there wasn't some legal reason why they could get this removed.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 38:18
“And unfortunately, those conditions were known at the time that the service agreed upon.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 49:27
“Is there a reason why we wouldn't annex this as well?”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 49:40
“I'm sorry. We're jumping ahead. Apologies. Yeah.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 55:18
“So I think we're in agreement with everything.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 1:00:31
“We get feedback from city staff on those legalities that were brought up.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 1:11:13
“not to increase the flora area proposed in the preliminary development plan for non-residential use by more than two percent pmdp is showing 22.5 and fmdp is showing 96 error the actual number is what were you asking about floor area preliminary development by non-residential yeah that's the one so the actual numbers are it actually went down um So it went from 22.5 to... Yeah, it went from, let me see here.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 1:13:50
“And as John mentioned, the waiver is only for the residential buildings and not for the commercial buildings.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 1:21:07
“The retail could potentially be smaller. That's right.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 1:23:14
“really love where the pool is at. Those folks are going to have a nice view of the parking lot and then interstate 40. I'd love to see that internal somehow, even to have that apartment L flip-flop so the pool is internal to the facility, but it's just a quality of life thing. Other questions, comments?”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 1:30:58
“Huge fan of Cheerville, further east down division. I'm a cheer dad myself, so I'm there often. Very familiar with the current facility and love to see all of the owners expanding their business in the area. had a question primarily around parking because of my familiarity with the current facility and and parking can be um interesting to say the least so are we is is the building properly parked today and or will they have access to some of those spots within slick cities parking”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 1:32:25
“OK, that actually would love feedback from the school and call for representation.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 1:33:46
“are you going to seek a parking agreement additional parking agreement i can inquire about that with the owner i would the only reason i bring that up is i did a little research the other day on dropping off and picking up my daughter from the current facility and there probably 90 plus spots now shared amongst the rest of the businesses. But a vast majority of that parking is a Cheerville customers at the current facility. And it is a pro to the best of my knowledge is approximately 8,000 square feet where this facility is going to be 17,000. So I'm just making the assumption that there will…”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 1:56:11
“We have to know roughly what the percentages of the facades are on the Ford and Honda dealers. I'm thinking in my mind.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 2:37:59
“That effectively would lock them into FMDP. It needs to look like BNDP.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 2:44:11
“Okay. Can we ensure that the... Come on up.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 2:44:21
“Can we ensure that the gates open inward or is far enough back from those properties so as to not impede the front of their property?”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 2:48:54
“So, you know. Just a point of contention that they weren't changed for this development. They were changed citywide. This development had nothing to do with those changes. an entire redraw of street width, sidewalks across the whole city.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026
- Play at 2:50:40
“as a valid point that may be a good issue to take up in the future as far as those traffic studies combining, you know, existing with future.”
Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026