Remarks by Misty D. Roundtree
56 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 3
- Play at 1:48:20
“And the statute actually explicitly bars any of the data from being sold. The data is not open to the public. The data cannot be shared with any other entity, cannot be used for any purposes other than non-traffic purposes.”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:48:36
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:48:46
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:49:16
“Okay. But in essence, if the vendor has not identified it at 21 days, even though there's nine days left, it's not going to be issued? That's correct. Okay. There is a 30-day grace period from the time the cameras are installed, and that 30-day grace period applies to each specific location.”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:49:47
“Okay. So the rollout is, I assume, not going to be all at once. I know you've identified certain schools that you plan to place it at.”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:49:57
“Okay. I know you've given that information to us. Can you share what schools that are planned to be rolled out first?”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:50:11
“Okay. The statute has, you know, kind of a delineation between July 1, 2027, pre and post. And so it states that until from now, from implementation until July 1, 2027, there is a requirement for one sign to notify drivers. And then after July 1, 2027, it's a minimum of two signs, one of which must include a speed display. And I take that to mean a sign that says you're going X amount.”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:50:41
“I thought that was a little, no disrespect to my General Assembly folks, but I thought that it would seem to me that you would start out with more signs because after a year, folks probably would already know that it's there. Do we have the ability to start out with the two signs and maybe even the speed display initially?”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:51:04
“Okay. Okay. And is the thought that we're going to start with those identified schools, see how it goes with the expectation that it would be most of the schools, if not all of the schools in the county at some point?”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:51:36
“Okay. So some schools may be tucked away in neighborhoods such that there really isn't an issue with speeding.”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:51:41
“Okay. This does not result in any criminal liability, no points on anyone's driving record, anything like that. And again, even if somebody misses the court date, then the sanction is possibly a DMV hold, but not a show cause, not a failure to appear, no snowballing effect of missing this.”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:52:06
“and there is a requirement that every year we provide data to the General Assembly, and I think DMV, if I'm not mistaken, of how many have been issued, how much revenue has come in, so forth and so on.”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:52:23
“Is there some thought to monitoring that on a yearly basis and seeing, you know, whether this is something that is working, reducing speeds or anything like that?”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:52:56
“Got you. I think I understand the process and I'm always trying to make sure that there is a due process element to it. The fine, and I spoke about this in work session too, so the statute by max allows a $100 fine, and so what is being proposed is right at that max. I don't know that I believe that a $50 fine, which I know some neighboring jurisdictions start at, is more... more of a deterrent than a $100 fine. I don't think somebody's going to be saying, well, I'll speed if it's 50, but not if it's 100. But I do think that a difference in that could mean whether somebody is able to pay an…”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:54:17
“Agreed, but the difference is in that scenario, you're interacting with a police officer. You know that you're getting the ticket. They know that you're the one driving it. You're checking off the boxes for a lot of assumptions that are being made when it's a photo camera as opposed to an in-person camera. So it's kind of like this trade-off to say we don't have the 100% certainty that we do when it's a police officer issuing a citation when it's a camera. And I think a lot of people, you know, you kind of get that visceral feeling. You get something in the mail where a photo was taken of…”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:22:57
“Thank you for all of the information, and thank you for everyone that spoke. I will say this. This is not a discussion about flock, and you all know how passionate I am about the flock conversation, and I hope that not too much time passes before we have that public conversation. But because I care so much about the flock conversation, I do not want it conflated with what this is because it, in fact, tends to harm the actual and legitimate flock conversation in my mind. There are, you know, law enforcement cannot be handicapped in doing its job. I certainly don't believe that. And school…”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:05:15
“Justin, could you go into detail on each of the 11 pages, please?”
Board of Supervisors · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 6:08
“Have I got everybody here? I think so. Thank you all for coming.”
Board of Supervisors · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 13:15
“like to come, except you weren't claiming it.”
Board of Supervisors · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 26:54
“So, yes, you all heard that correctly. I saw you looking at each other. We have heard your concerns about the road connection, and so we have taken that off. That connection will not be made because I hear you all saying that despite the connection perhaps making it easier to turn in. That is not something that you believe fits with your community. And so that will be honored. That request will be honored. Now, I'm going to hold you to it. I don't want to hear Henrico police saying that people are turning into this neighborhood illegally because that was a concern that we had about having…”
Board of Supervisors · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 51:47
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Board of Supervisors · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 51:53
“Had a few sleepless nights over this project, huh? Have you had a few sleepless nights over this project?”
Board of Supervisors · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 52:11
“Well, I wanted to just call you to the podium because I have spoken with you a lot since you brought this project, the idea of this project to my attention. And I think that, you know, I was pretty clear with you from the very beginning about some of the concerns that I would have with a project located here with the density that you're proposing.”
Board of Supervisors · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 52:34
“And one of the things that you were adamant about and insistent upon coming into it was recognizing that you couldn't do a whole lot about the school piece necessarily. You could do something about the affordability aspect that you know is something that I have been hoping to bring to Three Chopped. since I took office. And so I just wanted to give you the opportunity to put on record because, again, this is, you know, when we talk about proffers, it's not something that there's a lot of contingencies or a lot of unknowns, but I wanted to give you the opportunity to go on record with what…”
Board of Supervisors · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 56:36
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Board of Supervisors · Jul 28, 2026