Remarks by Mike Zibaie
11 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
- Play at 29:38
“Yeah, John, I think this probably is for Jason. I think, you know, with the significant amount of new buildings going onto this four acre, there's certain, you know, everybody knows stormwater is an issue. It's going to be a reduction in canopies as well, definitely as part of the project. I heard the wetland on the slide that you had with the four section that the wetland is supposed to address that. I was just wondering if there was a study that was done to say, hey, yeah, that's the case. This wetland is, based on this engineering study, is going to handle the additional stormwater that's…”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 57:06
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:04:18
“John, on that point, did Megan agree to the clarification? as well i know jeff i i thought it was great point there you caught you caught this correctly but did the staff or or megan agree that that was the case that that the 25 of 60 really is being overwritten i think that's a question for catherine before she answers i just want to comment it was libya that figured it out not me”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:05:03
“Well, we have under recommendation now that that 25% of the 60% MII has been overwritten. Okay. So, um, Is that true? Is that true? Is that your question? Is this true?”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:07:40
“Okay. You are going to be meeting, and that's good. Okay.”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:09:35
“And let me know if you want me to scroll. I had just a question. I didn't understand something. Libby asked about the five foot clearance, I think, on Martin Luther King. And then I understood that the green is going to go into that five, you know, uh, five foot, uh, clearance, I think. Or trees that are going to go there. Right. So what I just didn't, I can't see the map, but is, is that, where is the, the, the sidewalk in that picture where the pedestrians are walking? But we have the canopies, but that five foot, if it's going to be where the trees are going, then where is the sidewalk?”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:17:42
“John, just a question. Has the feedback from the last few meetings, I know these were conversations, has those feedbacks been folded into the LUMO by TAS already? So we have a sort of finding more updated copy that we can look at?”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:21:22
“John, October 6th will be The only time I'm going to miss the session because it's my vacation. I'm taking, you know, it's planned vacation time. But so just procedurally, how do we do this if we have feedback? Number one, I would love to see if there is an update, what that update looks like. So I'm not going back looking at things that we already, you know, provided feedback. But number two is, do we use email to send you things with everybody copied on it? Is that the appropriate way of doing it?”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:22:23
“I'm used to it. This is on public record. I'm used to it. Thank you for that.”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:00:57
“John, I'll go first. You were kind of leading the conversation that was in my head as well. The two, I think, are also very related. We're trying to improve the supply, the attainability, okay, in one case, and then environmental impact because now we've got more density. I think what I'm hearing, even from the public too, is I think TASI has done an amazing job trying to balance, in one sense, increasing the canopy and in another case, decreasing so we can get more done, build more. But maybe it's the fear of unknowns, right? At the end of the day, it's just the fear of unknowns. But is it…”
Planning Commission · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 2:11:13
“Just one clarification. It was the next meeting, not September 15. It would be in first Tuesday in October.”
Planning Commission · Sep 1, 2026