Remarks by Michelle Stallings
270 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 10 of 11
- Play at 3:53:12
“Oh, and if they're coming with exceptions at that point?”
City Council · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 3:56:00
“Okay, I'll try this one too, I guess. I move that we approve ordinance number 27-2026, approving a development code amendment to chapter 11, development application requirements, updating requirements for site plans. infrastructure site plans, preliminary and final subdivisions, um, just with the direction to include or city council in section 11.030 C. Um, and in section 11.020 a and B and strike PRDs, and then to, um, amend the language regarding warranty bonds. So it's consistent.”
City Council · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 3:59:21
“Yeah. I like that, but I, can we require future councils to put a, limit in that development agreement or just leave it up to them, I suppose. But 10 years is a long time. I kind of like the idea where they have to come back and justify it yearly or every two years, something.”
City Council · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 4:01:15
“I'll throw this out there. If we took out GL together, and then in the future, could there be a development agreement where they allowed something like that?”
City Council · Jul 28, 2026
- Play at 43:14
“comments I guess I don't know if I have questions thank you for taking the time to look into this I know you out there and appreciate that looked into the options so thanks for your time there the feedback that I I got from residents there are several different options that you presented One was business-only parking, which I think would be hard to enforce. How do you know who's a visitor who's actually working there? The other one is limiting it to two hours. The residents didn't like that option as well. So I'm thinking the permit part is probably where we go. I do like the idea of maybe…”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 47:08
“And the other concern I have is it sounded like they had some kind of agreement. They met the requirements without the agreement, but they had one and they lost it, and this is kind of causing the problems. So again, it goes back to kind of a broader issue of entering into these contracts for parking or leasing agreements for parking, especially, and this is in the case here, but especially when it comes to meeting our parking requirements, things change. Plans change. And I believe in the past, we had something in our development code or municipal code, I can't remember, where it said that…”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 48:09
“Or access, yeah. Two different ones. A leasing where... They leased space from somebody else, but it does go back to the shared parking agreements too.”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 48:28
“And what about the leasing of parking space?”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 48:55
“But if we had that or if anybody had a leasing agreement with somebody else and they amended that, would that business owner still have to meet the parking requirements some other way? so if they if they decided they weren't going to lease as many stalls okay so an example somebody leases parking at the legacy center from us and we're like you know we want to expand the legacy centers we're going to get rid of this parking so we have to amend this agreement yeah then is it on that the business owner to find new parking to meet their requirements or how do we address that um i think in and…”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 50:07
“So do we ever have any agreements between two private property owners for leasing parking? And if so, do we require that if they're going to amend the contract and not provide that parking, they have to provide it somewhere else? Do you know?”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 51:38
“Is it a little more honored, I guess, or protected?”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 58:16
“Thanks, Chief. Mayor, may I ask a question? So what does that civil enforcement look like? I mean, would there still be some kind of a penalty?”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 59:38
“I was going to ask you another question, and I forgot it too. I guess we're done. Do you use this around the high school, and is it working well, or have you not?”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 1:25:28
“that earlier on the meeting just for our own sanity i guess if the council is good with it the only concern i have is we did do that before and we had some poor lady stay past that discussion to speak to code amendment so maybe ask if anybody's here for 5.6 through”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 1:26:07
“Mayor, I do have a, I don't have the RDA agenda pulled up, but I, this has come up before we usually start with the soccer field parcel. I would, prefer to start with the Cornbelly's parcel.”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 2:46:55
“Wow? Yeah, I do Well questions first Brad what is the status of the sound wall? Do you know? If I remember right there they looked at a possibility of putting it.”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 2:47:42
“potential locations of the sound wall would affect this property or not?”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 2:48:10
“Okay. I just wondered about that. Ryan, I Trying to pull up state code here, but as far as the development agreement, can we require development agreement for something they might be entitled to?”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 2:48:27
“Yeah. I guess it's not rezoned heavy commercial, but usually, yeah, maybe that'll change it. My understanding was that if they're entitled to property rights, based on the zone that we can't enter a development agreement. But they're not really entitled to those rights at this point, because it's not zoned. It's just the general plan. Yeah, you got it. OK. So my comments are the general plan is just a general plan. It does not vets property rights. I think to deny it, we might have to have a little more findings to support that. But my opinion is that This is heavy commercial next to…”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 2:49:45
“Sorry. I lost my train of thought. I think the point was made that we rezone this heavy commercial. It will open it up to any of the uses allowed in heavy commercial. So we just need to keep that in mind. Though I do appreciate the potential purchaser not wanting to do very intense things but we can't ever guarantee that it could be sold or plans can change so again just want to reiterate the general plan does not vest rights property rights it is just a general plan and i i i would be open open to looking at the general plan and making some adjustments there to provide that transition so i i…”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 2:55:10
“I have one more question that came up. Go ahead. Sorry. Kim, in the past, we had an applicant come with a proposal to do kind of an office warehouse, if I remember right, in a commercial zone. What is the status of that? And would that, we did that change, would that flex?”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 2:56:28
“kind of like that idea I'm wondering if it wouldn't apply to this the proposed use here and maybe that can help with our this issue without having to go to a development agreement yeah we could”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 2:57:08
“If we made that code change and it fit what their desired use was, it would”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 2:58:17
“Yeah. Yeah, I guess a development agreement would be a quicker path forward, but I'm going to throw this out there that I did like that idea, so maybe the city can pursue it on her own. I don't know. Yeah, I like Flex Commercial too.”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026
- Play at 3:36:50
“Wouldn't you have to maintain the easement there too? Even though the ditch isn't on your property, the easement is, correct?”
City Council · Jul 14, 2026