Remarks by Michael Privett

87 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 3 of 4

  1. Play at 35:59
    “And they're pretty far into their development, so they're not going to make any changes.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  2. Play at 46:52
    “Bare minimum pedestrian connection between the two.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  3. Play at 47:46
    “Can we make the next one connect where it goes north and then connect west, like right there? I don't know. I'm always for connections.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  4. Play at 1:14:16
    “All right. And this one's very similar to the one we just passed, except for a residence that's adjacent to it. That'd be my only concern. I'd like to hear anybody else's concerns about that. I'm mostly okay with it because it's on the hard corner and across from other C3s. But, yeah, it's next to a property, an AA property, so...”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  5. Play at 1:14:46
    “I assume that they're mostly okay with it because of the proximity of other C3s there that they'll like it. They were happy the Sonic came in. They were actually, you know, some of the others at the gas station and all that stuff. Thank you. My main concern is just for the person next to it. And he's pretty far away, you know, so, I mean, and that's, you know, he's going to meet the speaker box threshold probably, but that's another problem, too. It could be right there facing his house, so that's my only concern, mainly, if it was to be a restaurant or drive-thru.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  6. Play at 1:15:38
    “Yeah, and very similar to what's at the north.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  7. Play at 1:15:52
    “So, yeah, that one house should have been noticed right next to them.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  8. Play at 1:16:14
    “Okay. Well, that said, I'll move to recommend approval of PC 11010.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  9. Play at 1:34:27
    “Yeah, we're a base of R4. Yeah, there's not going to be any billboards allowed. There won't be any billboards.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  10. Play at 1:36:39
    “What is the AI sign calculator looking for?”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  11. Play at 1:38:12
    “They could go a little bit higher if they have a monument sign. Poll sign's 11 foot. I think that's what the gaggle here says. Right, so if they...”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  12. Play at 1:42:05
    “Yeah. But it looks like they could turn on that, at least a three-point turn.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  13. Play at 1:45:52
    “What require you to do? Just on your site. We're just trying to keep you from having to have a problem of planting something that's not really plantable.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  14. Play at 1:47:54
    “What is the north partial zoning? Is that O2?”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  15. Play at 1:53:35
    “broken up C3 for the easternmost 100 feet or whatever. You could have tracked it. Yeah, tracked it one and two with R4 in the back. And then it would be R4 abutting R4. And C3 on the front abutting the R4 with sight-proof screening on that side, which makes sense.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  16. Play at 1:54:50
    “Yeah, I mean, because that whole... West side could theoretically be parking garages, retail sales, gasoline sales, all that.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  17. Play at 1:55:10
    “The front track on Western being C3 I have no problem with. Okay.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  18. Play at 1:56:08
    “Does it need to be renoticed? Sorry? Does it need to be renoticed, does it?”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  19. Play at 2:36:50
    “And my deal is, you know, if we approve this, there's three or four more of the same lots that it could be exactly the same thing right next to it. And I'm just setting a precedence here, and I don't think it's a good one. So, you know, max maybe four units as staff recommended, maybe. But I just don't think this is the area for this development.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  20. Play at 2:52:01
    “Hopefully they get on the register of historic places. The house to the south of this, those don't get built on these lots because that is terrible. It fits better there because there's nothing around it, but it would be terrible if those four lots ended up with a house like that on them in that neighborhood. It just doesn't make sense. The commercial property? Is that a commercial property? The one on 13th. Yeah.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  21. Play at 2:52:30
    “With a pool? There's a commercial property with a pool? Yeah, we wouldn't try, we build in Jefferson Street. Oh, I know, I know, I'm just, I'm not talking about your development, I'm just saying if this doesn't get on the historical register, that's a possibility that those R1 lots could look like houses like that, and that's a problem to me. But, it's a totally different subject. But, you know, R1, I think is where we're at.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  22. Play at 3:07:25
    “Yeah, I mean, I think Probably did the disservice yourself with the picture because we're not supposed to look at pictures But that right there kind of just makes me not like this application at all.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  23. Play at 3:08:00
    “We're not going to design it, but that just solidifies it to me that that does not fit.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  24. Play at 3:08:20
    “And four plexes, you know, in the plaza, that works. That's fine for me. But eight plex on top of this and three stories. It just doesn't work for me.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  25. Play at 23:54
    “Congratulations. Sarah, how come we didn't do this at the beginning? Just curious.”

    Planning Commission · Jul 23, 2026

Back to Michael Privett’s profile