Remarks by Michael Lynott, Esq.
55 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 3
So what was approved? He already did it.
Oh, it wasn't approved. So on June 17th or whatever you said, it was disapproved or disapproved? Okay. And because why?
But it was it was an after the fact permit correct. After the fact, it's still treated like a regular permit right so he's right, but what was wrong with it, that it was that was just disapproved.
That's working better. You got to just get closer.
Yeah. So that's what they're saying, that you put the ugly side on the outside. That's not supposed to be.
So in English, it sounds like you have to apply for another permit. It sounds like they will approve it if you put the good side on the outside.
Okay, this is the new owner. As of when?
And when did you guys get possession of the property?
The property is not... You represent the owner?
But I saw an email on August 7th from a Briff Corp. Is that you? Is that your email?
Okay. That said that he was going to get it taken care of like in a day or two.
Are you guys building another soulless square?
The door is going to be the one facing the road?
The one that's back in. What are those three arches? Windows?
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
But as far as the address she says she wants things mailed to, do you have that address?
So we'll see you soon, and your driveway looks good.
And no family? Nobody's contacted you? Nobody?
When did we get this? Is this in my... Is this an add-on? No, it was in our agenda.
No, it just says memorandum. It doesn't say 5.1.
I'm still reading this, so just give me a moment.
Okay. So I've had a chance to look at this, and it says that fundamental due process shall be observed and shall govern the proceedings. Okay. I'm looking at the memorandum, page one, the highlighted section here. I just highlighted. It says that also on fundamental due process, which is at the bottom of page two, it says, uh, Although the rules of evidence are relaxed because it's quasi-judicial, fundamental due process pursuant to Florida Statute 162.07 requires that fundamental due process be observed. It is necessary to fill the procedural gaps By common sense application, the basic rules…
Well, I'm talking about a history of the police department, whether it's a current administration or not. It's something that we have to recognize and you learn from the present and the future by what's happened in the past. Of course. And all I got to say is that every single case where there has been a police officer that's come in here and testified, with regard to the complaints that were made that were brought before the board, I believe that we voted unanimously in every single case once we heard the evidence. So if it's not about getting a police officer to come in here and to testify…
Does the noise complaints that have been issued, does it say in there that you have the right to cross-examine the officers when these violations are made? Yeah. Okay, so when they get the notice, as a layperson, there is no information that's provided to the resident that they have the opportunity to require the police officer to be there and to cross-examine them at the hearing?
I read that at the beginning of the meeting. All right. That's fine. If they come up here and they say that they want to cross-examine the police officer, then we table it. Yes. Okay.