Remarks by Michael Hernandez
11 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
- Play at 18:55
“I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION IN THE AFFIRMATIVE TO APPROVE THE TEXT AMENDMENT OR TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE RELATIVE ELEMENT CODE AS WRITTEN.”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 20:01
“JUST AS A GENERAL THOUGHT BEHIND THIS, I ACTUALLY DON'T MIND THIS TEXT AMENDMENT PERSONALLY BECAUSE I THINK THAT THIS IS, BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE SUP PROCESS, IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING AND ALL THAT STUFF LIKE THAT. I DON'T CONSIDER 4A A BAD IDEA. I THINK THAT'S ACTUALLY A GOOD IDEA SO THAT WAY WE HAVE MORE INPUT ON WHERE THE CITY MAY WANT TO ACTUALLY PLACE THE ANIMAL SHELTER. THAT'S MY THOUGHT.”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 43:49
“I HAD ONE QUESTION. IN YOUR PRESENTATION YOU MENTIONED THAT THERE WERE ALTERNATE LOCATIONS. WAS THERE A PRIMARY CONSIDERED?”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 1:22:36
“Any comments? Yes. Just to be clear, I'm not sure why we're separating them, to be honest with you. I don't know why we have to complicate that. It seems to me like there's, I would, REALLY QUESTION WHY WOULD WE NOT ALSO ZONE THE ONE THAT'S IMMEDIATELY NEXT TO THE FIRE STATION. THAT SEEMS A LITTLE TOO GRANULAR TO ME. IT SEEMS LIKE THIS WHOLE AREA SHOULD BE C1 JUST BECAUSE OF THE PROXIMITY TO THE FIRE STATION. I DON'T KNOW WHY IT NEEDS TO BE SEPARATE. um as a matter of the sup i'm very much in line with where i think everybody else feels this is the wrong place for the animal shelter but since…”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 1:29:09
“ONE OTHER POINT I WANT TO MAKE. COMMISSIONER POWELL, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M UNDERSTANDING ONE OF THE POINTS YOU WERE MAKING. MULTI-FAMILY IS NOT C1, CORRECT? CORRECT. SO THERE'S, IF THESE ARE ZONE C1, APARTMENTS SHOULD NOT APPEAR THERE? CORRECT. OKAY. I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR.”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 1:38:38
“CHAIR. POINT OF ORDER ON THIS. IF WE'RE VOTING TO TABLE THE SUP BUT WE'VE JUST REJECTED, DOES THE TABLE BASICALLY BECOME A MOVE POINT?”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 1:39:12
“THE MOTION WAS TO TABLE THE SUP, EXCUSE ME. BUT IF WE'RE VOTING TO DENY THE CHANGE IN ZONING TO C1 FOR THE VACANT PROPERTY, THERE'S NOTHING REALLY TO TABLE AT THIS POINT.”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 1:40:11
“JUST TO BE CLEAR, THE ACTION ON THE SUP?”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 1:40:15
“SO IS THERE A NEED TO DO A VOTE ON THAT OR DO WE JUST SIMPLY SAY TABLE?”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 1:40:53
“right and it's it's and you're absolutely correct i think it is a moot point but at the same time because like you said we are a recommending body if if we say to table it does that basically force council to say only dealing with the zoning and then once the complete studies are done for the sup then they can come back to us and correct yes or no right so the only action depending on you know when these move forward to city council the only action would be on”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 1:41:26
“TO SAY WE'RE TABLEING THIS? TO SAY WE'RE TABLEING THIS? I DON'T REMEMBER. I DON'T REMEMBER. I DON'T REMEMBER. I DON'T BELIEVE WE EVER HAD TO.”
Planning and Zoning Commission · Sep 22, 2026