Remarks by Mark Shelburne
3 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
- Play at 1:32:38
“I very much respect the views of my fellow commissioner, but I don't agree. Reality of being in this position that I know we all share is that Well, it's easy to say in general you support missing metal. There's pretty much always a reason why this one specific thing isn't right And that's what we're seeing here yet again And to me this is residential Development in a residential neighborhood, so I have no problem. I would have no problem voting in favor of this I”
Planning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 2:21:14
“I've got a question and a comment. I guess I should separate the two. You can deal with it as you wish. So start with a question for the applicant if it's kind of a technical one. Was there any consideration analysis of mixing an approach of having maybe keeping the bigger of the buildings and then putting new construction next to it? Was that, is there any logistical feasibility to that?”
Planning Commission · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 2:22:46
“That's, yeah, I appreciate that explanation. And as for the aforementioned comment, I don't believe that NCEA The NCOD should exist, and I don't agree with the strong towns incremental, but I am troubled by knocking down this housing. So I'm very conflicted now more than I have been in a long time. Thank you for your comment.”
Planning Commission · Sep 22, 2026