Remarks by Mario J. Bailey

42 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 2

  1. Play at 46:16
    “I move to accept the ones that submitted their waiver. Second.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  2. Play at 51:00
    “Mr. Chair, we're also using our social media, kind of how we're doing for sure.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  3. Play at 55:27
    “Yes. So for the covenant, the 2024 covenant, so nothing changed. Every obligation is still the exact same.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  4. Play at 1:53:19
    “Member Bailey first, I'm sorry. Mr. Chair, I was hoping that we would take up item seven first before six, because specifically kind of what you talk about, because it is like workforce housing things in the actual larger project, and so I would like to see how it totally fits.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  5. Play at 4:00:05
    “Do you have any more follow-ups or you good? Thank you, my question is to start with staff. Thank you for the presentation previously, so I kind of had an idea of where we're going tonight. The jointer that was sitting at 513 kind of threw me off slightly. So is it in effect tonight, like all the changes?”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  6. Play at 4:01:04
    “Okay. So my first question is regarding one of the changes, like one of the new conditions on 5E. And so it seemed like the chief protection for the 5,730 affordable workforce housing was in condition one. With that new condition 5E, it can be converted administratively with no return to the board. Could staff speak to that change, that 5E?”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  7. Play at 4:02:49
    “Okay. All right, so my next question is regarding condition four. It basically says that parcel within the master plan may be developed at any time pursuant to the underlying Trans Act. Basically, so if a parcel can be developed based on that, does that mean that they can pretty much exit the program while the district keeps its entitlements?”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  8. Play at 4:04:18
    “All right, let me scroll down to, sorry, I have a couple questions. That relates to the affordability. Is there a master covenant now that's traveling with this along to the county locking in those 5,730 units?”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  9. Play at 4:05:06
    “Thank you. The next question is for the applicant. So for the 314 public housing units, is there a one-to-one replacement? So I know at Curling State, they have- No, no.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  10. Play at 4:06:01
    “Let me make sure I understand correctly. I know they have the first, their current resident has the first right of refusal to move in. But the 314 units that will now be gone, will there be like the, for... future renters, that same rate of the public housing has been lost.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  11. Play at 4:06:36
    “The reason why I asked about the 314 because it is a very different rate from the workforce affordable. And so I wanted to make sure those 314 units were locked.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  12. Play at 4:07:04
    “So my next question for you, the area two is solely market rate, which seems to be closest to the station.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  13. Play at 4:08:04
    “Thank you. I just want to ask the applicant who's responsible for Area 2. So there will be solely market rate in Area 2, correct?”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  14. Play at 4:09:30
    “And so you're representing Area 2 also, correct?”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  15. Play at 4:09:34
    “Okay, perfect. If Area 2 can just speak to why.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  16. Play at 4:10:43
    “And one final question, I think. Savannah, I think you answered it. I just want to get clarity. So given paragraphs four and five for the county, the joiner, how will the covenants be required for 2B and 33 be recorded against the five county parcels without the county's written approval?”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  17. Play at 4:33:37
    “I had a question for staff. There was a gentleman that was here earlier, and he spoke about he learned, his wife told him he came, and I think he heard his address while he was here, just in case he still listened. He wanted to figure out how he fit, and I don't know if staff can possibly answer.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  18. Play at 4:35:26
    “Oh, okay. It was just about the other guy.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 15, 2026

  19. Play at 44:01
    “Mr. Chair, for the new members here, will you consider having the gentleman to finish his presentation so we can, some of our questions might be answered here in his presentation, but it's new to some of us.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 1, 2026

  20. Play at 49:12
    “So, Mr. Chair, he was just addressing the civic space as a 5% requirement, and so there's some things that related to the changes that he was actually addressing in his presentation that I would like to hear.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 1, 2026

  21. Play at 1:11:52
    “Yeah Thank you, thank you Thank you for the presentation a couple questions the first is for I guess”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 1, 2026

  22. Play at 1:12:38
    “So what we're bringing in, we're saying there's no additional, because we currently have enough civic spaces. Oh, yes. Okay.”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 1, 2026

  23. Play at 1:13:00
    “Thank you. Thank you. Next question I think is for staff. It's regarding the retail front of Gladens. So there was a requirement before, well, 70% by right, but now we're moving that number down. Question for you, why are we now kind of relying versus the public board, UDRB, versus now giving the discretion to the planning director for moving that number?”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 1, 2026

  24. Play at 1:16:01
    “Thank you. And then my final question is regarding the parking reduction. It removes the criteria if you lie within 600 feet of a parking garage. It kind of say if it's a transit corridor or a transit-oriented development area. I know a lot of our transit is still in development, may or may not happen. So can you speak to specifically why we felt the need to remove this connectivity to a parking garage?”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 1, 2026

  25. Play at 1:17:15
    “Sorry. Follow-up question. So you said because they're close to Biscayne. So help me understand, like... How does the transit corridor close to Biscayne, how does that help reduce parking? I just want to make sure I...”

    Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board · Jul 1, 2026

Back to Mario J. Bailey’s profile