Remarks by Lisa Borowsky

191 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 4 of 8

  1. Play at 3:18:51
    “Sorry, excuse me, Councilman Klausman, I didn't mean to interrupt you. No, because if the city attorney circulates it, we will all have the opportunity to not only have digested it, but have consulted with... our city attorney at the same time. And then we can tweak it, not a whole presentation.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  2. Play at 3:19:38
    “Louise, I would oppose that, because this is a package. She's obviously done a lot of work, and if everyone approves it, it would take five minutes from the dais, so I don't see the issue with that.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  3. Play at 3:19:56
    “The ordinance that's based on the motion. Draft ordinance.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  4. Play at 3:20:12
    “Okay, let's keep going. So I thought I saw Councilman Graham, but Councilwoman Dabowskis.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  5. Play at 3:21:04
    “Vice Mayor McHale. Oh, you already spoke, so hold on. You did speak, right, Vice Mayor? Okay. Councilwoman Littlefield.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  6. Play at 3:21:30
    “I can't make it right here, but we can find someone. Terrence, you want to make some copies? No, I would like to ask some questions. Launch. Thanks, Councilwoman Whitehead. All right, so I have a bunch of questions, and I think it's going to play into maybe some additions to that. First of all, there are two issues here. I agree with everything Jean Rose said, by the way. There are two issues here that are distinct and, you know, really un... unrelated, the constitutional issue, and I appreciate the cases you cited. However, this is an unanswered question, this extreme advanced technology,…”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  7. Play at 3:27:18
    “Is that the same thing as the third party independent audit?”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  8. Play at 3:27:39
    “Okay, I have a couple more questions here. You mentioned the hot list and you mentioned MBD matters. how do they qualify for the hot list? What does that mean? Can you give us examples?”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  9. Play at 3:28:38
    “So for me, the hot list or the criteria for looking at the tracking, right, should be only in the most extreme crimes. I think kidnapping, you know, a violent crime that is known to us, an Amber Alert or a Silver Alert like you talked about where someone's life is at risk. I think we have to have a very tight list of what constitutes a basis, a good faith basis to be looking at this. And I didn't hear that tonight, so I really want to see a very, very strict list of how we're doing this with no gray area. In addition, there's a couple other things here that I want to talk about. I would not…”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  10. Play at 3:32:48
    “Okay, and then getting back to the audit, I would support a 30-day rotating, you know, every 30 days an internal audit. However, using AI, I think, is a good, and also limiting the user population. And then I would, I really like to see more frequent than annual reviews, because I think this is so important. I would like to see the first audit done in the next 90 days in terms of the initial audit from our city auditor with recommendations for third-party independent auditors that are highly versed in this technology. And so that's a lot of changes to that, but I do think strengthening it,…”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  11. Play at 3:34:19
    “Yeah, we want to do it right, as Councilwoman Littlefield said. And depending on what comes out of the audit, hopefully you're right, there are no anomalies. I have to find that hard to believe, no offense, that in all this time, a year and a half, no, sorry, since 2023 that we've been using this, I really find it hard to believe there has been not one anomaly. That would be surprising, even if it was a mistake. But having an independent third party do this would be important to find out really what this looks like. I think for you guys too. All right, I am going to call on Councilman Graham.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  12. Play at 3:38:30
    “That's what I want, but That's your birthday? Well, there you go.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  13. Play at 3:39:00
    “Let's just... That's not necessary. She just accepted the amendment.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  14. Play at 3:39:07
    “Well, that's why we're bringing the ordinance back and everyone will receive a copy of it before it gets to a vote.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  15. Play at 3:39:19
    “Right. We're giving them direction to prepare the ordinance for review and approval. It's pretty...”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  16. Play at 3:39:44
    “Why is that necessary? She just accepted it. The second just accepted my amendments.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  17. Play at 3:39:53
    “I can go back for them, Adam, if it's necessary. I think it is necessary. Okay. I do.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  18. Play at 3:40:02
    “So you do understand we're not voting on the ordinance tonight?”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  19. Play at 3:40:25
    “So let me go back through them again then, since the first accepted it and the second accepted it. Let's go back through them. Hey, Ben, did you take the notes? Do you want to go back through them?”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  20. Play at 3:41:06
    “having a much smaller pool of people authorized to use the technology, I think that was in your motion, having a second set of human approval or eyes on the search or on the access to the technology, right?”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  21. Play at 3:41:31
    “two people have to approve, a second person has to approve. You can't unilaterally access it without the approval of another designated authorized user. Which makes sense, they're all on B, that doesn't seem to be a stretch. Does it already happen? No, I don't think that's.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  22. Play at 3:43:35
    “Okay, thank you. 30-day retention policy. That was the other one.”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  23. Play at 3:43:43
    “You have to get state approval to reduce your retention policy?”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  24. Play at 3:44:06
    “Well, why do we retain for 185 days, but Peoria retains for 30?”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

  25. Play at 3:44:32
    “um so whether peoria or other cities or have petitioned the state for a different schedule a custom schedule that's possible or they are not aware of that requirement okay i would like to see an audit on this current uh use historical use within 90 days can you do that”

    City Council · Oct 6, 2026

Back to Lisa Borowsky’s profile