Remarks by Lilah Rosenfield
11 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
- Play at 33:20
“So right before this meeting, I took the opportunity to actually visit the site. It's a really remarkably large site in a really gorgeous neighborhood. I disagree, kind of, that it's as far as you can get. There are places that are much deeper into neighborhoods. This is a couple of turns away from 17 South and the new Glendale Regional Park, certainly within walking distance. I also have a sort of temperamental concern about spot zoning. And at the same time, I think the project proposed here makes a lot of sense. And the goal for contiguous green space, I think, is highly beneficial in this…”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 1:27:46
“WHAT'S THE TIMELINE FOR THE WHAT'S THE TIMELINE FOR THE PUBLIC NOTICING THAT WAS MISSED? PUBLIC NOTICING THAT WAS MISSED? CAN WE REASONABLY EXPECT THIS TO CAN WE REASONABLY EXPECT THIS TO SHOW UP AT THE NEXT MEETING OR SHOW UP AT THE NEXT MEETING OR WILL IT TAKE A LITTLE LONGER?”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 3:03:16
“We can go ahead and discuss. This might have been with a different project, but I seem to recall that there was a display of a three-bedroom house in the envelope that is proposed under EHI, VHO.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 3:03:40
“OK, but it is certainly possible to have a three bedroom home, which would support a family of two parents and two kids.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 3:06:08
“COMMISSIONER BURROWS, I FEEL LIKE A LOT OF THAT IS IN THE PACKET.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 3:06:47
“I mean, I'm not sure digestibility is actually the core problem, to be honest. I think that like we saw a big age difference, right? There were some pretty obvious demographic trends, and I think that there is. I mean, I have a long discussion that I'm hoping to give because I won't be able to be here in a couple weeks, but I guess to give a sort of preview, I think that there's some real differences in raw interests, like material interests, who benefits from this and who doesn't benefit from this or is potentially harmed by it. and that's not going to be addressed by like telling the staff…”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 3:12:07
“Thank you. You might have answered this before, but if we are talking about an R1 5K lot, and it's exactly 5,000 square feet, the lot, and it has a conforming single family home on it, Is it possible to build any EHO buildings on that through subdivision, or because it's perfectly matched, you can't actually do anything?”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 3:14:17
“It gives much more flexibility. Did anyone else have?”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 3:25:52
“Well, given the circumstances surrounding the Expanding House and Auctions vote and given that I will be unable to make our subsequent meeting, I'd like to give my thoughts on some of the questions that face the Commission as we evaluate this matter. We've, over the course of several months, gone over the fine policy details. And I very much appreciate the work that staff has done on those details. But for a moment, I'd like to zoom out and talk a little bit about the context. I want to talk about political economy. Bear with me. The downzoning that this proposal seeks to partially undo was…”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 3:29:57
“I move that we retain both the chair and the co-chair.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 3:30:13
“Sorry. We're a package. I move that we retain the chair.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026