Remarks by Kyle Brezovec
53 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 3
- Play at 54:05
“I have one question for each of them. Since next is up here, I would like to ask if you could, for myself to some degree, but the audience at large, why would a developer opt to choose going with this conservation approach? plan versus just the standard use by rights regular and you had a nice grid up there that kind of compared and contrast them. But why am I as a developer choosing to go for this conservation over just say standard?”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 55:51
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:03:51
“Thank you. I have one final question for the planning. Next team. You're well credentialed. You have a large breadth of experience in many cities and all over the state. You have taken plenty of time to evaluate our land development code. This plan that has been submitted via the settlement, do you see any reason, any grounds on which, via our zoning, that this plan should be changed, altered, or denied?”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:40:00
“I suppose now that we had confirmed there were no more comments, we have an opportunity.”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:40:08
“Thank you. I'll just keep this very brief. I am not a lawyer, and I don't pretend to be one. I think even a well-versed lawyer would not give an opinion after hearing some legal thoughts for the very first time, so I plan to confer with City Solicitor and take this feedback. This is absolutely a public hearing and I do want to hear that feedback. I don't have a lot to give back yet at this time. The only thing I would maybe ask, and Tom, I know we don't have Brad here, I do believe you did some amount of work on the stormwater. You're somewhat familiar on that. Do you have any comment on the…”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 2:16:42
“Thank you. Similar to the last round, I don't intend to address items specifically around this. I do want to just say thank you to everyone who came here today. During this process, we've largely relied on our legal advice from the city solicitor and their opinions and their legal opinions. This is kind of the first public opportunity for us to hear people from the other side, people who listen and who live in the area and want to give a differing legal opinion for us to hold this up against. And I appreciate that. I appreciate the research that everyone has done and the time everyone has…”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 2:22:42
“Thank you. In light of President Byrd's statement, I would just mirror what Councilwoman Weinstein said. This is in no way affecting my approach to this. I think I've done my best to prove that I take every piece of legislation before this council at its merits. Yes, I suck. Excuse me, I should prepare these things. I did seek a legal opinion that more than gave me every confidence that this was no conflict of interest and therefore I do not intend to revoke those residents who voted for me of their voice here on council and recuse myself from this matter. I will not be, so thank you.”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 2:36:58
“I'm thinking about how to word this as plainly as possible. You mentioned in your presentation takings. Takings has been brought up here a number of times by residents. I believe the general point being made was takings needs to be 100%. What is your take on that?”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 2:39:11
“Thank you. I just have one other statement. I don't feel you meant maybe necessarily this way when you were saying, you know, don't listen to X, don't listen to Y, listen to who you, we were elected by the residents and we absolutely will listen to the residents. That's my, and I didn't mean that. I know you did not, but I want to make that clear that that is my job.”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 3:11:26
“Thank you. Two comments. One, the other day I had the opportunity to tour the renovations that I've undergone so far at the fire department. It is looking fantastic. The fire department has kind of been able to move into their new section. The EMS is now in the kind of holding area that the fire department was in as their area is now torn up. But things are coming along nicely. I'm very excited for everyone to get the new space. I'm especially excited One item of note was that we will have now two locker rooms, full-size men's, but most importantly, a full-size women's locker room. The EMS…”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 3:33:04
“Councilor Brzezic. My understanding is the postponement is to give staff enough time to consolidate the feedback. I'd just like to push back a little bit. This was already a postponed date. Is it possible we could consolidate that information in time for I believe the 27th, October 27th would be a regular council meeting? That's a workshop. That's a workshop. Apologies. Okay.”
City Council · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 13:45
“Thank you. To your point about moving the jobs around in comparative communities, a part of that one pager or an additional page I think would really help me is of comparable or within reason comparable land similar to YDC? Do they have economic zones that they are in? What essentially are competitors offering right now?”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 29:12
“Thank you. On the financial report that we're anticipating, do we have an understanding of how granular they're going to get, especially regarding the southern portion, the financials of the hotel, the financials of the flex space? I know it says community flex space. I don't know if that, more the market hall, I suppose, than the community flex space, but...”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 30:24
“Very nice, okay. And then the hotel's reasonably straightforward. A hotel is a hotel. How exactly, what is the operating model that they are assuming with this market hall? What does that look like?”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 48:43
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 52:48
“Are you thinking? Yeah. Okay. It's not a bad idea. It's just to me the way the percentage changes also changes the number of units, right? they're correlated um i i want to stay within pretty close to the parameters that we've been showing the public right i i don't want you know we've done all these charrettes and all of this community engagement and then us to sit here and say that's great and i'm glad they liked it now let's make it you know 80 units of townhouses obviously we're not going to do that but uh The number we give, I want it to be pretty close to what we've been showing. And I…”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 54:02
“Yes. But I'm fine giving your question on the sewage for this county. I think 70 hotel rooms and 80 whatever residential, give or take, and then do whatever conservative rounding you want to do. I think you have a number for that.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:04:02
“I think we're going, let's submit at the max that we gave to the residents. Let's go 74. And it sounds like the geography of the space does the math for us on the percentages. So I think that's your direction.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:06:40
“I apologize. So yes, we've had this statement on HCTV a couple of times now. You said it's going to be a topic of discussion. Do we have any preliminary ideas, plans on how we're going to address that, or is that just a topic for another time?”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:08:20
“So essentially just admitting that we're subsidizing it is kind of option one. Is there any other thoughts out there yet or do we need to have a separate discussion item on this?”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:08:41
“Thank you. I feel like we've had this note on this every month. And so I just wanted to have a bit of a discussion on it. Okay. We know we're losing money here. What's the plan? Okay. All right.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:17:00
“I guess... SHE DOESN'T HAVE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON IT. I GUESS I WOULD JUST LIKE SOME AMOUNT OF INFORMATION. I ASSUME STAFF NEEDS FURTHER TIME TO GATHER INFORMATION, SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THE ORIGINAL REASON WE POSTPONED THIS HOWEVER MANY MONTHS AGO IT IS NOW WAS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SO WE COULD TAKE ACTION ON IT. I JUST WOULD LIKE SOME IDEA OF WHY.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:51
“I move to accept the minutes as provided.”
City Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 29:18
“A few comments. First, the HCTV Advisory Committee met last week. There wasn't much as far as new business. The one item was that they are looking into technology and working with legal as far as the need to provide closed captioning in events. There is an FCC regulation that requires community television. provide closed captioning. They already do most of the closed captioning in-house. The one kind of outstanding question is with the live broadcasts, because that's not something we can do in-house. We have till 2028 on that, so it's not pressing, but it is being worked on. Next, I do have a…”
City Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 44:35
“Councillor Brezovic? I would like to make a motion to suspend the three reading rule.”
City Council · Sep 1, 2026