Remarks by Kris Nicholl
104 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 4 of 5
- Play at 31:13
“I have a question. Does the resolution include all of the other items that are in the packet? So like the official ballot proposition, that's included in it?”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 31:38
“And so. OK. And on page 40 of the packet on the recorder certification does she sign that tonight. Or does it imply that she signs it tonight? Because the minutes aren't adopted from this meeting until the next meeting, and it talks about minutes.”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 34:26
“I'll just go on the order that they're here. Thank you.”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 38:05
“That's AKA, my Home Depot buddy. I see him every time I go to Home Depot.”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 1:42:27
“I want to thank Allison for bringing up the property sales. I love that idea. I love us talking about ideas to fund it. But when we talk about that, and if in the ideal world we do sell property, are we going to allocate one-time funding for something like an improvement in that, right? That's a one-time fund. But if we're looking at it to fund The ongoing maintenance? No? Okay, all right, yeah. That would become a little bit of an issue. But, yeah, I love this idea, and I love how people have said they've analyzed data, and I realize that how we analyze data is different, right? And so I see…”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 1:58:13
“I just have a question. When we're talking about tranches, maybe this is Brian or Lynn. Do we have to have the same hearing process for the second tranche?”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 1:59:01
“So if we were to say the 21, and it did become $30 million, we would have to go through the process again.”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 1:59:28
“Not a ballot proposition. Oh, yeah, it would. Or a vote.”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 1:59:53
“Yeah, that's my line of thinking. So another reason. that I think is a great reason for Cindy saying that the cap is 31 is that 30, excuse me, 30. It would have the effect of not having to go back to the people to the bank again and ask them again. So just my thought on what was said about that.”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 2:08:46
“Yeah, I don't know. But just for clarification that you're Because you were the opposing. Yes. You're bringing it back for reconsideration. Okay. Right.”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 2:19:23
“Tell her it was for 31. 30. 30. I don't know why I have 31 in my mind. 30.”
City Council · Aug 11, 2026
- Play at 47:33
“MS. All right. Off you go. MS. I'm concerned that the language doesn't have the option or it would be limiting our options that we've already put out to residents as selling a portion of the property. So I think it's really critical that we stick to what we presented to the public and maximize that instead of inhibit us with this property.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 48:12
“It's necessary because we have put that out there as a possibility to residents. And if we don't end up doing the magical plans or getting in a financial pinch, we need the option. And so can I... I would like to see language in the next resolution that includes selling the property, or a portion of the property, whatever it is.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 48:52
“Language that includes selling all or a portion of the property. Because those are scenarios one and three, I guess, something like that.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 50:00
“Right. I think it needs to be in the resolution and the bond language.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 1:09:45
“Yeah. Did I state my need wrong or my want wrong was that I think it needs to be included in the bond language. I didn't necessarily want to specify it going on to the ballot information, the pro or con, but I think it does need to be in this resolution and for the bond language. That's what I meant. Did I hear wrong, Jason?”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 1:11:39
“Yeah, that's, I'm not... I'm sorry, I'm not expressing myself very well. That's not what I was getting at. I just want them to know in the resolution, not specifically the bond language or what goes on the ballot, that that is also an option that could happen. When they want to dig deeper, that option that we've been saying for the last month is still an option. specifically state that in the resolution that we need to adopt in order to move forward with the bond.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 1:27:08
“Thank you. I just have some comments that I'd like to share. This is not in rebuttal to anybody else, but I've taken a lot of time and analyzed the recent studies and surveys that have been completed. And these studies were done without a deadline or a timeframe. They were taken at times when nothing was going on. So I really wanted to kind of focus on some of those answers. We do have a parks master plan that was just completed in 2024. And this is one of my favorite quotes in it. In order to achieve high level of service and the department provides every decision met with a question. And…”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 2:08:10
“Yes, thank you. It's admirable what you're asking, 100%. But this is what I foresee in the future happening. we do $4 million for a police room remodel. And I hear the conversation of police don't need anything now because we have given them a police remodel. I think it adds a negative effect to getting them the type and kind of building that they really, really need.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 2:15:17
“I would like the option to sell a portion or sell the land be explicit in the resolution that we are may be going to adopt next week.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 2:26:10
“Yes, thank you. I want to reiterate that it's imperative to let the people know of the ongoing costs. And those have not been addressed yet. possibly even saying that there could be a tax increase, because that's a possibility. We haven't heard anything from administration that has signaled how we're going to manage that yet. So I'm assuming that. And not a bad thing. I'm just pointing that out. And I am not willing to go over $10 million, the appraised value. OK.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 2:35:00
“I like the idea of Brooke. I really do but I think we would question the Which proposal goes on there and it would be a just another something for us to debate at this point I want to in a way, but I don't want to in a way.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 2:53:35
“Recording stopped. Recording in progress.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 3:09:58
“OK, awesome. On page 43 of our packet. in the first vacancy submission and appointment of information, A, it doesn't state how that information needs to come to us. Do we need to put in writing at the end of that?”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026
- Play at 3:13:31
“Yeah, I didn't know if we were putting a date in writing. Yes, we are going to add the in writing. Okay, awesome. And on that same page, I think I mentioned last week about wanting to see the employment contract. So I would like to propose that there's a number six that includes the employment contract.”
City Council · Aug 4, 2026