Remarks by Kit McKeon
18 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
- Play at 15:34
“You're off easy. Thank you, sir. Thank you.”
Planning Commission · Oct 6, 2026
- Play at 51:32
“I was just going to follow up. You know, it is a requirement if you're flying a United States flag, if it's up 24 hours and there are lights, it's lighted 24 hours. And I think that's what you were asking. That is a requirement.”
Planning Commission · Oct 6, 2026
- Play at 55:16
“Well, that's what I was just going to call for, audience participation on that one, right? Okay.”
Planning Commission · Oct 6, 2026
- Play at 56:05
“Based on review of the application materials, the staff report and testimony, and evidence provided during the public hearing, the Planning Commission, sitting as a local planning agency, finds this petition complies with the design alternative criteria in Section 1.11.3, of the Land Development Code and therefore moves to approve design alternative petition number 26-36-D8. Okay.”
Planning Commission · Oct 6, 2026
- Play at 1:16
“I move to accept the September 1st, 2026 regular meeting minutes as presented.”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 34:55
“Do we have the agent to present their petition?”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 43:21
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 45:09
“i guess also i understand what you're saying but it almost appears to me if i'm looking for the rehab hospital and i know it's off curry lane i would want to see that big sign on the wall as i'm coming down curry lanes there it is but yeah that's a comment so what it's just just to add my comment mr falagi almost”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:11:48
“Based on review of the application materials, the staff report and testimony, and evidence provided during the public hearing, Planning Commission, sitting as a local planning agency, finds this petition consistent with the comprehensive plan and in compliance with the Land Development Code, including decision criteria in Section 1.7.4, and therefore recommends to City Council approval of Zoning Map Amendment Petition Number 25-56RZ.”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:26:28
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 1:31:15
“Any comments from the members? If not, I'm going to let you off early today.”
Planning Commission · Sep 15, 2026
- Play at 2:47
“A motion to continue variance petition number 36 test 34 BC to the next regularly scheduled planning Commission meeting on September 15th at the regularly scheduled meeting time.”
Planning Commission · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 36:09
“Based on review of the application materials, the staff report and testimony and evidence provided, double P, during the public hearing, the planning commission sitting as local planning agency finds this petition complies with the design alternative criteria in section 1.11.3 of the land development code and therefore moves to approve design alternative petition number 26-39DA.”
Planning Commission · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 35:01
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026
- Play at 43:19
“I just make a comment. If I had my druthers, I would love to have a stipulation put on that that secondary exit and entrance is closed off for safety purposes. And I'd rather have that voluntarily done than us trying to, you know, strong arm. But anyway, a comment.”
Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026
- Play at 46:05
“I would say back at you. And by that, I'm not trying to be flippant. If a gate going up and down could effectively make that safe, that might be okay. But now living in a community right next to where you all are, those gates, you can get around those very quickly. intellectually and emotionally, if it were to be closed off, I would like to have no access, whether it's a chain link fence or something other. But that's my personal desire. And I understand that you've had some prior approvals.”
Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026
- Play at 1:05:24
“Excuse me. Based on review of the application materials, the staff report and testimony and evidence provided during the public hearing, the planning commission sitting as the local planning agency finds this petition complies with the design alternative criteria in section 1.11.3 of the land development code and therefore moves to approve design alternative petition number 26-17DA.”
Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026
- Play at 1:31:19
“Based on review excuse me based on review of the application materials. The staff report and testimony provided evidence provided but during the public hearing the planning Commission cities local planning agency finds this petition complies with the land development code including the decision criteria in section one point nine point four. and they're more therefore moves to approve site development plan petition number 25 dash 25 SP.”
Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026