Remarks by Karla Justice
45 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 2
- Play at 13:56
“Thank you. You take one and pass it down? OK. All right. Good evening. Madam Chair, I move that the Planning Commission adopt for the remainder of the September 16th regular meeting only the procedures governing questions, statements, discussion, and debate by members of the Planning Commission as set forth in the resolution below us, including paragraphs A through F. I move that the planning commission gives notice of its intent to consider and vote at its next regular meeting on October 14th, 2026 on permanently adding these same procedures to the planning commission's current bylaws and…”
Planning Commission · Sep 16, 2026
- Play at 18:05
“This would go for both. And this is very similar language to what the board of County supervisors follows.”
Planning Commission · Sep 16, 2026
- Play at 22:04
“I was just going to add... If there is a case or there's something going on where additional discussion is warranted, there can always be a suspension of this, just similar to how the Board of County Supervisors does that. So that's available. Also, too, I know that I spend quite a bit of time meeting with applicants prior to the meeting. Most of my questions are pretty well prepared or my asks have come through. And I feel that at the board level, if they have the same amount of time, I've made no reduction in time. This is the same amount of time that your supervisors have.”
Planning Commission · Sep 16, 2026
- Play at 25:37
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 16, 2026
- Play at 26:00
“Okay. Thank you. Can I add something? Yes. I'm sorry. I'll let Commissioner Ross finish. Sorry.”
Planning Commission · Sep 16, 2026
- Play at 38:41
“I'd like to make a motion to approve proffer amendment REZ2026-00007, Independent Hill Village, PRA, with the proffers dated August 31st, with the additional comment that the applicant work out the trail proper language before it goes to the board to ensure the alignment, standards, easement efforts, and connectivity are fully preserved.”
Planning Commission · Sep 16, 2026
- Play at 46:08
“If anybody has any input or wants to get together with me, hopefully, I'm pretty sure all of you have my cell phone number, so feel free to reach out, shoot me an email, whatever you think, and then, yeah, we've got lots of time between now and the next meeting. Thank you.”
Planning Commission · Sep 16, 2026
- Play at 52:26
“I discussed it with a couple of people. Yes, sir, I did.”
Planning Commission · Sep 16, 2026
- Play at 52:30
“Obviously, this isn't being added into the bylaws, right? Because our bylaws have a certain number of days that it has to be distributed prior. Sure, sure. So that's happening tonight.”
Planning Commission · Sep 16, 2026
- Play at 1:50:29
“Okay. Vice Chair Justice. All right. Thank you. So somebody came up and spoke about Bridalwood community. And the question came up about a data center going in close by to Holmes there. Is there a way that as a homeowner, that's just an example, can go and look at this map and see exactly what properties are coming out of the data center overlay and which properties are staying in the data center overlay?”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 1:51:19
“Let me reword that. A map that would show who would be out of the data center overlay if they don't meet that criteria within 90 days.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 1:52:09
“I just wanted to clarify, non-conforming use was brought up. Is that on one of your slides? It's not one of my questions, by the way.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 1:52:18
“Okay, because I think Commissioner Carroll brought up non-conforming use, and as far as I understand it, wasn't it brought up non-conforming use?”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 1:52:31
“I thought so. That's not in the documents anywhere? No. No? Okay. Because non-conforming use, as I understand it, had a completely different meaning. But if it's not in there, then that works. My third question is, when we had this presentation last time, it was reviewed that this ZTA was brought forward by the board, and there was some language in there about no substantial changes. So if substantial changes are recommended... then that would require a whole new board action. Is that my understanding?”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:06:28
“He didn't accept the friendly amendment.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:45:28
“Point of order? Yes. I'd like to call for a vote on the first motion. We need two-thirds to agree, and then we'll vote on the first motion. Or the second motion. Whoever wants to agree on what we vote on. Okay.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:46:05
“Okay, but I'm calling a vote on the first motion, and we have to have a two-thirds.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:46:16
“Somebody could call for the motion and then two-thirds agree.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:48:47
“I called for the vote prior to the second. Correct.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:49:20
“I know that we could take a moment and we can look through Robert's rules. But my understanding of Robert's rules is that if somebody calls for the vote at that time, the board, the commission can make a vote to decide to call for the vote. And if two thirds agree, then we vote on the motion that I called.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:49:45
“So his motion was not finalized at that time.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:49:54
“That I don't know. I would have to take a moment, and I would have to look through Robert's rules. My point right now is that I called for the vote prior to your second.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:50:09
“The main motion or the second motion? And I put that to the chair to call a vote. So we could take a moment of recess. We could flip through Robert's rules if you guys would like to make sure that we're all on the same page. But that is at the discretion of the chair. That is my understanding of Robert's rules. I could be incorrect. Somebody can let me know.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:56:23
“I'm just saying that if you would just let the motion fail and nobody would make another motion, you wouldn't motion to enact that occurring.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026
- Play at 2:56:49
“The 22nd of September is shorter than 90 days. I believe that. That's why I'm trying to waive that.”
Planning Commission · Sep 9, 2026