Remarks by Jerry Jasper

20 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1

  1. Play at 0:30
    “I move that the minutes be approved as submitted. We have a motion to approve.”

    Planning Commission · Oct 6, 2026

  2. Play at 3:48
    “Site visit only. Site visit only. Site visit only.”

    Planning Commission · Oct 6, 2026

  3. Play at 15:58

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    Planning Commission · Oct 6, 2026

  4. Play at 20:04
    “Site visit only. Site visit only. Site visit only.”

    Planning Commission · Oct 6, 2026

  5. Play at 1:13:56

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    Planning Commission · Oct 6, 2026

  6. Play at 0:48

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    Planning Commission · Sep 1, 2026

  7. Play at 37:09
    “Based on review of the application materials, the staff report and testimony and evidence provided during the public hearing, the Planning Commission, sitting as a local planning agency, finds this petition complies with the land development go including these decision criteria in section one point 9.4 and therefore moves to approve site and development plan partition number 26 dash 25 SP.”

    Planning Commission · Sep 1, 2026

  8. Play at 0:57
    “I move that the minutes be approved as written.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  9. Play at 12:53
    “Mister chair, yes, Mister Jasper based on review of the application materials. The staff report and the testimony and evidence provided during the public hearing the planning Commission sitting as a local planning agency finds this petition complies with the land development code. including the design decision criteria in section 1.9.4 and therefore moves to approve site development plan amendment petition number 26 dash 11 SP.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  10. Play at 37:16
    “The plot plan here is very very busy but appears is there the chain link fence on the outside of the buffer so so long the road. The shows of chain link thanks and everything's mixed there so it's hard to determine.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  11. Play at 37:45
    “So I can confirm that I can I get back to you in the rebuttal with that answer would you like to know for sure that's fine and when you're doing that it looks like that chain link fence continues across the secondary outlet. I'm to Jean Green Road so actually has a chain link thanks cross. You'd almost assume it's an emergency exit.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  12. Play at 42:47
    “As the secondary was approved in the previous application now we have a new plan in front of us is that it is that not a point of discussion it automatically approved in even though we have a different plan for us.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  13. Play at 49:16
    “Yeah, you mentioned that one of the major differences is the previous one we had back in November was part of a PUD.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  14. Play at 53:18
    “Yes. Well, I kind of feel a little different than Pam because basically with it being down in the center, the trucks are actually going to be going faster than they would be pulling up to Nice Trail. So until I'm convinced that there is no other secondary entrance to meet our code other than on to Jean Green Road, I can't support this. Okay.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  15. Play at 1:17:30
    “Mister Jasper yes in our code is there any definition that separates parking from temporary parking.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  16. Play at 1:27:20
    “Originally, I've read about, I think this was, or something like this was planned several years ago, and is this basically a condo type situation where they were going, I know that was probably a plan years ago, or are these going to be rental spaces?”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  17. Play at 1:27:48
    “Okay, so that is a change. Secondly, I believe the question was asked about restrooms and so on, the intent. These are fairly high-end type things where people would store maybe high-end boats or collector cars or something like that. So would possibly the restrooms be there? Somebody might spend a period of time, not staying overnight or anything, but a period of time working on polishing and this type of thing? Is that the intent for the restrooms?”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  18. Play at 1:36:07
    “Yes, Mister Jasper the planning Commission sitting in the local planning a sitting as a local planning agency finds this petition consistent with the comprehensive plan in compliance with Florida statutes chapter 1, 6, 3, part 2 and therefore recommends the City Council approval of text amendment petition number 26 dash 32 am.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  19. Play at 0:54
    “I move as to prove the minutes as submitted.”

    Planning Commission · Jul 7, 2026

  20. Play at 1:28:51
    “yes yes jasper roger as you and i think you clarified it by saying structure when we're talking about the sod but how about basically in lieu of a fence if you have like a four foot high shrubbery barrier hedge is that covered uh as a variance or is that permitted”

    Planning Commission · Jul 7, 2026

Back to Jerry Jasper’s profile