Remarks by Jerry Greenberg
195 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 6 of 8
- Play at 3:13:55
“So I'm fine the way I just want to be. Some of my comments are sort of why was stuff removed. Some are specific, very specific wording type things. Would you rather we do that? I mean, I don't know.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:17:45
“OK. And on one, if we're in the one, 1-3.5, the protection of natural resources, that all comes out. And forgive me if you said that already. But why is this all out? I know there's a bunch of stuff later on about natural resources.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:18:03
“Admittedly, I didn't go to see if it's all the same. Did 1-3.5 and the ensuing sections get moved somewhere else, or did they come out for a reason?”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:22:11
“I don't have anything. I had nothing in there.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:22:16
“And you said the table, the big table that's here is nothing new. It's just putting it on. It's a reordering, but not, or it's a presentation, but nothing is substantive.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:27:28
“I guess the question is, does it have to be in here at all? I mean, this is a comp plan, not a strategic plan.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:27:35
“Wish list. I mean, I don't know. I would say the same on five ends.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:27:58
“Can we then soften? I would say this is about five and six.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:28:41
“So this is in 2.1-2.1.1.3. I would also, without specifying it, note in number three, A typographical might merit a second review. 2-1.1.2-1.1.3, number three. I would just check the spelling one more time. There's a T before the word it's. That I don't think is part of the comp plan. I don't know. I'm not saying my eyes were drawn to that particular item in the compiler. Everything equally counts.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:29:32
“Careful reader. I'm just pointing out typos.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:31:38
“Well, don't you think that one, I'm with you, but don't you think that one and two, one at least sort of covers that point and then, I'm not trying to step in, but I'm fine.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:46:23
“I did have someone said on two point on two, though. Should we do this now?”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:46:27
“OK, two. Oh, I'm sorry, but I don't want to cut you off.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:46:46
“No, that's OK. 2-1.5.2, lowering the speed limit. I don't think we have to debate the issue here tonight, but I do have just some I'm concerned about the way it's worded. I would suggest that because I don't think we're, at least I'm not ready to commit us to lowering the speed limit yet. It's something obviously we just did some of the streets. I think the understanding is the study is underway. So I would suggest this be changed to studying the speed limit and say that we will conduct a study regarding the study of speed limits, or evaluating, not a study to reduce. Because I don't want to…”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:47:35
“By the way, I'm not really sure that it's reducing cut-through. It's about the safety and the community component, however you want to do it. But I just don't want to make sure it doesn't look like we've reached a decision on that.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:47:51
“Right, so I would change the title. Well, two things now, though.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:47:57
“No, but I think we should say study lowering the speed limit. But also, it's not conducting a study to reduce. It's conducting a study.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:48:35
“Yeah, listen, I think the discussion, the debate is one to have. Yeah, that's a good suggestion. All right, got one.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:55:41
“Just the reference to 3.2.3 to opportunities for group homes, housing, and elderly and foster care. I mean, that's perfectly fine. But it looks like it was originally in there because of a statutory, sorry, 3-2.3. 3-2.3.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:56:05
“Yeah, sorry. Objective 3-2. There's a strikeout pursuant to a statutory requirement.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:56:16
“So we're just still keeping it in as a...”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:56:33
“I mean, I don't know that we want it as a policy of the village if we don't need one. I certainly have nothing against them in the appropriate context. But I don't know if we have an affirmative policy that we want group homes.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:56:51
“That's what I'm saying. I would think we might want to.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:57:32
“Okay. And on 3.1.9, all the energy efficiency stuff, is that coming out?”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026
- Play at 3:57:41
“Okay, so it's still there. This isn't because somebody's telling us we're not allowed to talk about that. Right. Okay.”
Village Council · Apr 14, 2026