Remarks by Jerimy Meek

80 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 4

  1. Play at 2:31:04
    “Right. Right. But DEQ allows three-quarters, what is it, three-quarters of an acre with water. Or half an acre, yeah, that's what I got. So with city water, we're guaranteeing, basically, and I did speak with Brady about... If you guys want to go one step further, lot three is giant. They got all kinds of room. Lot one is the tiny one. We have one as far as requiring a 30-foot spray-filled easement, which would keep a future person from being able to come pull a building permit to put a swimming pool or an accessory dwelling or something where you need to be spraying aerobic, and that…”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  2. Play at 2:32:45
    “No, I don't see a problem with that. Lot 3 is really big.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  3. Play at 2:33:47
    “We have the right-of-way also. Okay. With that, anybody have any other comments? Do you believe our TEs are good? Do I need to read them again? You good? Okay, with that I'd like to recommend approval of PUD 2155 with T number one adding exhibit B, PUD 2155 exhibit B being tied to exhibit number one, adding T number three that lots, lot one must access city water. And T number four.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  4. Play at 2:34:35
    “Well, two has a current well. Oh, okay. Yeah, so lot one only for city water. As it's shown on exhibit B, they do show that. And then T number four would be a 30 foot aerobic spray filled radius easement must be shown on the permit drawings, that time of permit.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  5. Play at 2:35:41
    “We've done it several times over the last six months.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  6. Play at 2:36:48
    “And that's kind of why I tied it to a building permit, because if it's written in a PUD, they come in for a building permit, they pull up the PUD, they read that it has a, have a 30-foot spray-filled radius easement shown on the plan.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  7. Play at 2:37:47
    “And if the plan reviewers do their job at the development center, they pull a PUD and read it and enforce it.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  8. Play at 2:38:45
    “that drainage easement so that's what we can do okay i have faith i think we can figure it out um even if it sells to other people and it's not or indoor there's no structure ever built and the spray field easement won't come into play yeah um that's my motion if it sounds good to miss sarah”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  9. Play at 2:42:22
    “I got the email. It was a new person in planning that I didn't recognize their name.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  10. Play at 2:42:31
    “When, when, when? A couple, three days ago, two or three days ago. I'll search for Dave.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026

  11. Play at 26:59
    “That's just the deal. That time pretty much passed with the zoning.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  12. Play at 27:42
    “There needs to be... There wasn't a preliminary plat required on this. There was only final. And there should be something that if... preliminary or final plat's not put in within five years, that the PUD sunsets and goes away because it's not right that this thing's set there and the community grew around it. But this thing, as long as they meet the requirements of the old PUD, they can just start doing the work. And it's unfortunate and something that needs to be looked at to be changed.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  13. Play at 31:14
    “You don't have to do it, but if you have a layout for buildings and parking lots that we don't have in our packet here, but if you have that to speak to the... Do you have a way to see it? Yeah, we can't project that. We weren't given that, so that would help a lot of information to let these neighbors know which way the buildings face, how far apart they are. And I figured you had that, it's just on the final plot it's not shown.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  14. Play at 34:47
    “Well, I have a thought on this. It's unfortunate that none of us were up here when this zoning was done, and none of us have it here to look at. This gentleman and the tenants, they do not have to make any concessions. This is simply a plat process today.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  15. Play at 35:09
    “Right, I'm just trying to explain that. I, like Don, I don't see why approving the final plat, it's not gonna change whether the Cedar or Case apartment people wanna be good neighbors and make changes after this. When, if they did that, if we deferred this and there was a meeting and there were any changes made, nothing would change on what we're doing right here. I'm not asking for changes.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  16. Play at 36:38
    “And you said you've already got the paving plans, the detention plans, the W water plans, everything's done?”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  17. Play at 44:54
    “No, because it says west. Why no, but it could just easily be to the north. North, yes.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  18. Play at 57:46
    “And playing devil's advocate here with, I know it's a boulevard entry. That's no, with 520 families and 970-something parking spaces, if we didn't at least have a crash gate, boulevard entry or not, if power lines were down across Northwest Expressway, there'd have to be another way out. I don't see why. Could it be a... public service access only?”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  19. Play at 58:28
    “Oh, I agree. Everyone would shoot through the apartment complex to the north, and that could get dangerous with speed. But just worrying about natural disasters, you've got to kind of plan another way out. We're fine with that.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  20. Play at 59:55
    “That west street that would have to cross through the detention could be a public street all the way to the north.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  21. Play at 1:12:51
    “Anyone else? Anything? No? Couldn't all of this all have gone together as one big PUD, though? But look how easy this was.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  22. Play at 1:17:43

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  23. Play at 1:18:07

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  24. Play at 1:35:26
    “I thought we had the cool sign calculator.”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

  25. Play at 1:41:41
    “There is a note through fire that says that a fire department turnaround will be required all the way at the west end. Did you know that?”

    Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026

Back to Jerimy Meek’s profile