Remarks by Jacob Arment
7 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
- Play at 43:39
“I also have a traffic question. So in the conditional use site plan, I noticed that along a, you're moving the current, and I don't know how to describe this, but you're basically, in front of the parking, you're adding a 17-foot spacing to a solid white line. And then you're also moving the double yellow. And I'm not sure what the function of that white line is. Because that doesn't seem to be parking, since there's already parking behind it.”
Planning Commission · Aug 19, 2026
- Play at 45:34
“OK. OK. So that's just about giving access to the head end. That makes sense. The other question I had was on the, I guess that's currently a utility easement, but it was mentioned that garbage trucks and other such things are using that. I don't know what the plan is going forward, if there's still going to be enough room for garbage trucks.”
Planning Commission · Aug 19, 2026
- Play at 46:25
“Okay. Yeah, I just... I'm not seeing that on the drawings there, and also there's utility poles in the utility easement.”
Planning Commission · Aug 19, 2026
- Play at 46:38
“Okay. Yep. So I guess if there is an access easement, any future development would still have to allow that room for a trash truck and whatnot to still maintain.”
Planning Commission · Aug 19, 2026
- Play at 46:49
“Okay. I think that's all I had. Thank you. You're welcome.”
Planning Commission · Aug 19, 2026
- Play at 1:02:05
“Commissioner Arment. I had one other question for staff. Because it was brought up that they are having no parking on site. And I wondered how that interacted with bike parkings. Is there also no requirement for bike parking? And I didn't see any bike parking proposed, so.”
Planning Commission · Aug 19, 2026
- Play at 1:02:33
“OK. So the plan is just to have them park on Main Street. That makes sense.”
Planning Commission · Aug 19, 2026