Remarks by Hayden Dublois
138 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 6 of 6
- Play at 2:57:07
“Thank you Does the motion include? The language for condition number nine as it's written or yes as it's written.”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:24:47
“Zach, can I ask you some questions based on the public comment? Roadway improvements, it was mentioned previously, I thought you guys were assuming that. Am I incorrect?”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:25:26
“By the way, we're putting up signage, let's go forward on... no parking in the swales for towing logistics. Who handles that? Is that at the marina's expense? Is that at the city's expense?”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:27:33
“Zach, it was mentioned about the TIS being based on the last 2012 count. You guys did do some counting, as you mentioned, right? There were actual traffickers.”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:27:59
“Is it accurate, not a traffic question, sorry, American Hunter, American Patriot, are those overnight vessels?”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:28:13
“They are. Okay. So you could have folks – those spots could be taken up for days?”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:28:20
“Okay. It was mentioned about captain and crew. How are the – I'm sure this is dealt with or contemplated in some way, but how is that dealt with?”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:29:38
“It was also mentioned – One of the public commenters testified that they have observed currently as many as four buses at a single time on the property. Do you guys have operational data or any information on how many buses may have been on the property at one time? And if it was over three, would – are you then essentially self-committing to constrain that going forward? MR. Yes.”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:30:35
“Have we monitored in the past whether or not there's been more than three?”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:30:49
“MR. Okay. The only reason I ask is I could see if there has been more than three, and operators have been used to that, the constraint creating issues since we're not reducing the intensity of uses on the site. It's only being increased if you consider the restaurants and some of these others. Last question I have is, I want to go back just for a minute to the construction of the, and if this is the very last thing, the second to last thing on the parking study that Rosmarina proposed wet slip usage in passenger counts. It was testified to earlier that you all arrived at these passenger…”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:33:06
“I'll just close with a comment. This is probably one of the most difficult votes I've taken since I've been up here. And I'll just say there are two competing things in my head that I'm trying to reconcile. One is you have an application that's clearly had a lot of time and consideration put into it by an applicant that has made concessions. And it's on a C-5 property. We have no C-6. where a restaurant and all these other things are uses by right, obviously there are variance in conditional use purposes, but I'm speaking about the site development plan. On the other hand, I'm also internally…”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:49:26
“As you know, the site development plan is tied to these other two.”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026
- Play at 3:53:45
“It was the conditional use we didn't talk about.”
Planning Board · Jul 23, 2026