Remarks by Gurtej Atwal
32 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 2
- Play at 19:05
“So what's the current zoning of these parcels?”
Planning Commission · Oct 14, 2026
- Play at 19:19
“So is it possible to pull the dimensions where it was mentioning the setbacks? So are they all one-acre lots? No. Sorry, go ahead. No, I'm sorry. The top two, they are one-acre lots? Correct. okay so the setback for one acre and fifteen thousand they kind of the rear setback uh seems to be same so normally is that the process”
Planning Commission · Oct 14, 2026
- Play at 20:17
“So does that mean after this is implemented, so no development review permit will be needed for in-development?”
Planning Commission · Oct 14, 2026
- Play at 20:37
“Okay, but the building permit would still be required?”
Planning Commission · Oct 14, 2026
- Play at 42:07
“So is it a state law? Yes. So 31 days, then it becomes a long-term rental. Okay, thank you.”
Planning Commission · Oct 14, 2026
- Play at 6:59
“Yeah. Hi, Chair. I have the request that I affirm and attest that I cannot attend the meeting in person because I'm experiencing a family medical emergency pursuant to government code section 54953.8.3, and I request a remote participation.”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 25:59
“Yes, I have the question. So as a city staff mentioned that there are different agenda items or the descriptions around the different platforms. So what kind of edits were made and what how many versions are there different?”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 37:14
“Yes, Chair. Thank you. So the question for the staff. So the comments were valid from different stakeholders. So I just now want the staff to respond to each and every comment. What is the mechanism if somebody listening to this meeting or a remote, they have similar kinds of questions, how can they approach and what is the media for them to reach out and get those answers?”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 38:06
“Yeah. So just to interrupt, so I don't request to answer those comments. So I don't I don't request to get those answers of the specific comments in this meeting. What I'm going to do is for those comments, as well as whoever is listening from the city, if they have similar questions, what is the route for them to get them answered?”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 39:03
“So one follow-up question in case a resident emails you with those questions. So what is the timeline? Is there a certain timeline they have to be reverted back?”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 41:13
“spa26-0003 a second all right we have a motion it's been seconded can we get a roll call vote please commissioner atwell so first of all i want to thank the staff for the detailed presentation and answering all the questions and thanks to all the comments that were from the residents And whoever is listening, they all have the opportunity to get their questions answered from their representatives. So with that, yes. Thank you.”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 45:55
“So are these regulations, they are implemented on someone who has an existing infrastructure or they will be for the future?”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 46:22
“So just to follow up, in case an existing tenant applies with respect to this law again, will they be considered or no?”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 48:26
“Thank you. So if a tenant gets changed into an existing infrastructure, the new rule will imply on those?”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 54:55
“Congratulations to Chair and Vice Chair, and a yes for the agenda item.”
Planning Commission · Jun 10, 2026
- Play at 19:59
“So does the signs in every other city have the same dimensions?”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026
- Play at 20:09
“And just to clarify the previous question, so right now the condition is for 100 square feet. And anything above 100 square feet has to have a CUP.”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026
- Play at 20:27
“No, regardless of the Ellis specific plan?”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026
- Play at 20:37
“The question is if something comes over 100 square feet, it has to go through CUP.”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026
- Play at 20:46
“Then why are we putting 250 a limit if... Tomorrow a sign comes for 210 square feet, 170. If it again has to come to the CUP, what's the purpose of putting 250 limit?”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026
- Play at 26:33
“Is it possible to implement the same citywide?”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026
- Play at 29:52
“So I'll propose a motion to move to recommend that the city council of the city of Tracy take the following actions first. waive the first reading by substitution of the title and introduce an ordinance approving an amendment to the ellis pacific plan to allow wall signs of up to 250 square feet with approval of the conditional use permit application number spa25-0002 exempt from the california environmental quality act sequa pursuant to sequa guideline section 15061 b 3 because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possible possibility of a significant environmental impact and…”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026
- Play at 32:37
“Yes, and thank you very much for bringing the project, and as it is consistent with the other Sprouts dimensions, so it's a yes.”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026
- Play at 38:47
“Can you please move to the pre-zoning slide? Yeah, so the sphere of influence, so that is the dark brown line? Yes. Okay.”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026
- Play at 39:08
“And there is light brown as well in this slide. So is this not considered a sphere of influence where the California aqueduct is?”
Planning Commission · May 27, 2026