Remarks by Greg Bozzo
458 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 14 of 19
- Play at 2:59:03
“Yeah, excuse me. Open the public hearing for public comment. Right, we have a lot of speakers tonight, as a reminder, so we'll go to one minute, and then we'll let the speakers speak here, and then we'll go to online, see if we have some speakers online. And take it away, Kim, who's the first three speakers?”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:05:05
“Linda, can you pull the mic down a little lower? Thank you. Okay. Thank you.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:11:50
“Thank you, Ron. Thank you. One minute. Thank you very much.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:16:17
“Thank you very much. Connie's next. Connie, then Basil, then Lauren.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:18:12
“Thank you, Colleen. That's one minute. Thank you very much.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:20:36
“Thank you, Lauren. Sana, please. And then David.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:22:57
“Thank you, David. One minute. Thank you very much.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:26:56
“Okay. Okay. Thank you very much. SO I'M GOING TO BRING THIS BACK TO COUNCIL FOR DELIBERATIONS, BUT I WANT TO DO A LITTLE REMINDER OR REVIEW FIRST. SO REMEMBER THE ITEMS THAT ARE UNDER CONSIDERATION TONIGHT. I'M GOING TO BRIEFLY SAY THEM JUST AS A REMINDER. SO THE FIRST ONE, WE'RE TRYING TO DETERMINE THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS STATULATORY EXEMPT FROM THE CEQA PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES. THAT'S WHAT MICHAEL TALKED ABOUT FIRST. WE'RE ALSO GOING TO BE TAKING ACTION ON A MOTION TO READ THE ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIT FOR THE READING. to introduce an ordinance amending chapter 30 article L of…”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:29:50
“Council Member Fregassi, so this is a reminder we're trying to keep separate the direction we're giving to staff and we're considering the ordinances recommended by Planning Commission or the staff.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:34:51
“Okay, I'm going to move on to Council Member Hilton.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:40:09
“Thank you. So one of the items that I've focused in on, Council Member Fregasi brought up earlier, and we've heard from public comment, is that the staff report and the planning commission's recommendation are not that far off from each other. They're really, really close. So to start this conversation, to see where we're going to get tonight, because let's remember, at this moment, we're not doing design review standards and objective standards. We are trying to determine, it sounds like we're This is boiled down to the staff recommendation or the planning commission recommendation. Planning…”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:41:12
“Yes. Thank you so so as it's as it's I'm leaving it to you guys to discuss it further, but I based on what I just said I would recommend that we recommend the Planning Commission recommendations. We're voting on that tonight and not on staff recommendations.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:46:01
“I'm going to comment on that because that's what I was trying to get at. So there's two things that are going on here. There's the linear feat that they have to notice, but part of the recommendation is also all publication is going to do noticing. So the whole city is going to get noticed through publications. They just might not get a card. So I would say let's be careful about how many postcards that we're going to require to send out, and let's focus on the fact that public”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:47:11
“IT LOOKS LIKE WE'RE HONING THIS DOWN TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW. ARE WE STICKING WITH THE THOUSAND FEET? LET'S HEAR IT, IF NOT. The Planning Commission recommendation is 1,000 feet.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:47:28
“Which is also part of the recommendation already. Which is also part of the recommendation.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:47:32
“So as it stands right now, it feels like we are going towards the Planning Commission recommendation. What am I missing?”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:47:40
“All right, so... I'll do a motion. I WOULD LIKE TO DO THE MOTION FIRST AND THEN DO THE DESIGN REVIEW DIRECTION FOR COUNCIL AFTER. TAKE IT AWAY FROM THE ACTION. YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FROM THE TOP, NUMBER ONE? ONE AT A TIME, PLEASE. NUMBER ONE. READ NUMBER ONE, PLEASE.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:48:34
“Correct. Correct. Go ahead. With the planning commission. Number one, please.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:48:59
“So that's a motion by Council Member Ramirez. We need a second, please.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:49:04
“I got a second by Council Member Marks. Roll call, please.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:49:17
“Yes. Motion passes six to one. Want to take the second one too, Council Member Ramirez?”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:49:38
“Second. So I have a motion by Councilmember Ramirez and a second by Councilmember Hilton.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:50:28
“No, number three would be heard. Okay, take number three then, Kelly.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:50:48
“I have a motion by Council Member Ramirez, a second by Council Member Fugazi. Roll call, please.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 3:51:03
“Yes. Motion passes six to one. All right. Thank you very much, everybody. So let's go quick and have a quick discussion. Now, this is not action. We're going to give Direction to staff regarding some design, objective design review standards. I'm going to start off with Council Member Hilton.”
City Council · Aug 17, 2026