Remarks by Gloryanna Rhodes
40 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 2
- Play at 1:06:43
“Got it. Thank you so much. Thank you for indulging me.”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 1:13:39
“I just have a follow-up through the chair because you asked and one of the responses kind of clarified something for me. So for the applicant, so what I'm hearing is something like this. If you are an in and out burger that only took orders through the internet, it would be the same clientele that would be coming through, that you cannot cater to trucks because a truck would not be able to drive through this window. Am I understanding this correctly?”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 1:14:23
“Okay. So it's not bringing trucks into the area because these trucks cannot make it through your window?”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 1:14:42
“Oh, parking. Oh, only parking for a bit.”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 1:14:59
“Yeah. Thank you so much for your response. Because what I'm seeing, it's no different than an In-N-Out burger. The only thing is that they can't stand there and read. and try to make up their mind, so it's quicker, actually, than a fast-through, if I'm understanding it correctly.”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 1:15:33
“Sorry about that. I'm trying to make a picture of this and in doing so, I actually thought you had closed it. I apologize for that. Then I mean, I don't see any reason not to make a motion to move forward with this because I mean, it would, that means they'd never be able to, if we said no, they'd never be able to get a In-N-Out burger or a McDonald's or anything else because it's the same concept is what I'm seeing.”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 1:17:15
“And I'm gonna read the pieces that it involves. That way it's clear to everybody. Okay, here they are. Forward to the Board of Supervisors the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program with a recommendation to adopt. Forward to the Board of Supervisors the findings for general plan map amendment with a recommendation to adopt. Forward to the Board of Supervisors general plan map amendment number PA2400220 with a recommendation to adopt. forward to the Board of Supervisors the findings for Administrative Use Permit number PA2400217 with a recommendation to…”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 1:45:59
“in terms of, you say that you're against some of the mitigation actions, and you did mention number four, which is a COG-related one. But then you went into a conversation about late comments. Are you saying that there are late comments and more mitigations that we don't have listed?”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 2:14:56
“Yep, yeah. Okay, so I'm looking at the recommendations, which would actually be what we are accepting if we do move in that direction. I want to address one before I even go into where I'm heading, and that is I would have no problem adopting the findings except for the compatible piece. But I like to have all of the pieces in place before I make any decision. And all I want to know is, well, I saw the cog. You mentioned the cog. And by the way, I was on the cog for 16 years, and I was part of drafting the Multispecies Act. So unfortunately, it makes perfect sense. It's right on target. But…”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 2:16:32
“Yeah. Yes. And that has to do with the canal, correct?”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 2:16:38
“Yeah. Okay. So there wasn't anything that I did not see. And then of course, the first one, which is the Exemption, that has to do with CEQA. I always feel torn because I do believe that farmers have a right when their time comes to say I don't want to farm anymore to use their land for whatever purposes they want, whether it be building houses or whatever. And I think I've made that clear many a times. However, I can't find that mining and homes are in any way compatible. There's a big difference in between me buying a home next to an agricultural parcel and having to put up with the smell…”
Planning Commission · Jul 16, 2026
- Play at 38:41
“Just a simple question. So it looks like it's pretty much just breaking it apart. So what was all unincorporated in that area, now it's designated for Mountain House, and then the rest still stays unincorporated.”
Planning Commission · Jun 18, 2026
- Play at 39:42
“Through the whole process now with their capacity?”
Planning Commission · Jun 18, 2026
- Play at 40:47
“No, just a comment. But they will have to at one point get a planning commission. I think you only get so long after you incorporate to move in that direction.”
Planning Commission · Jun 18, 2026
- Play at 41:15
“comments And then when someone like you make a motion to to accept item number two I Make a motion that we Go back that we accept the general plan text amendment number PA dash two six zero zero two zero nine to revise the cycle housing element adopted in 2025. Second that.”
Planning Commission · Jun 18, 2026