Remarks by Gary Martin
73 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 3 of 3
But you're only sharing the CAD portion.
And shouldn't any of you, if there's any, there's a Washington Post and Kennedy and Udall, tell me about it.
We're not there. We can ask that if you want to. It shouldn't have this part in the end date.
So are you saying that... Well, that's what I'm asking. The agreement says it's a calendar year and we don't work over a calendar year.
Well, that doesn't have anything to do with that. That's a January thing. This has to do with the budget. So as long as that payment's made before October 1st because I did look at the contract because after the
That's what we've been doing. That's why I'm asking.
Okay, so you don't know how the tax office works, but I invite you to come to my office one day and sit so we can show you
He prefers a two-year contract. Well, I mean, I agree with kind of what you said. I guess the reality right now is that today it will be in the next year. You're saying December 27th? It'll be January 1 to 28th probably is the estimated date.
It actually is everything. He can get out of this contract quickly. What date did you want it to end at? I would say December 31, 2007 is what I would recommend. Okay. That gets you closer to it, to two years. It should be open by then. There might be some transition period in the very beginning, but as it goes to county, it's on the calendar year budget. They're asking that you follow the calendar year.
Okay, so we're working with the county attorney's office and the The auditor's office, we have been, our county engineer, JCI, prepared plans, public mislabels, and things have been published. This bid was a low bid project, and so D&D instruction, or D&D contractors was the low bidder in that amount of $564,062.90. And so at this point, I'm recommending that we proceed ahead with our low bid and authorize the county judge Execute a contract. Is that a motion, sir? Well, I can make it as a motion, but I just wanted to see if there were any questions.
Okay, then I'll make a motion to award a construction contract that's authorized a judge to execute a construction contract with D&D contractors in and out of 564 or 063.
Hey, thanks to the, I'll see you all right. This is going to be a test contract with what you have. All the.
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Hey, hey, I'm sorry. Go ahead. She's got to sit down. So she has an order for us to sign. It's all done. Okay, can we proceed with a vote?
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Thank you. This is just for the private roads, I see it.
but I understand that there's already a regulation in place you just have to be careful on these permits and I didn't quite understand so if you recommend we table this because you can get more information why don't we take no action on that that way yeah I think we've got a little more to be curious I don't know if this needs to take you take me back to nelson
Anybody that wants to comment about pre-planning? Anybody else?
Yes. This is a private access. It's not required. It's only for
I'm very familiar. He's not a landlocked. He just walks out. No, I'm not a landlocked. Sometimes he has the road blocked and this and that. It's a civil spot. Nobody can get in and out. There's two other people, three people out there.
Yeah. He just wants cleaner access to his problem. Right. Yes. So the replat's done. We have .
The replat is just . It is not assigned by .
We've had issues with people bringing stuff because it's not signed and it's created some problems and so we just need to get those things signed. If you get a break, we'll be ready on the next agenda.