Frederick Johnson, II
Commissioner, Planning Commission · 19 remarks on the record · Last spoke Oct 5, 2026
Hear Johnson say it
From 19 remarks on the record: the newest that say more than procedure, each playing at its second in the meeting.
“Case of 2017-MA, put forth a motion to send it to... The council recommendation of approval.”
Planning Commission · Oct 5, 2026
“Commissioner, just a friendly amendment, if I missed it, just to include case number 26031MA. Yes.”
Planning Commission · Oct 5, 2026
“Yes, sir. For those of us that are moderately colorblind challenged, would you walk around the three light green shades surrounding the parcel, please?”
Planning Commission · Oct 5, 2026
“This is observation just to state what seems to be. Typically, the opposition is where a owner or developer is seeking a higher level of density or higher to up zone as opposed to a lower level.”
Planning Commission · Oct 5, 2026
“Staff is saying per comprehensive plan, you would prefer for it to be a higher level of density.”
Planning Commission · Oct 5, 2026
“Would be determined in the development process of that yes okay thank you thank you officially commissioner johnson this is our the map 185 appears to be incorrect then what is the balance of the site being zoned”
Planning Commission · Oct 5, 2026
Follow the Richland County Planning Commission with Hamlet for business
Alerts when your issues come up at its meetings, and every transcript in full.
See Hamlet for businessMeetings they spoke at · 1
Sources: richlandcountysc.gov · records through Oct 5, 2026