Remarks by Doug Weiss
427 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 6 of 18
- Play at 4:24:54
“We're not risking anything. I apologize. It's all right.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:25:15
“No, the purple line there is the county line. So part of this...”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:25:23
“So what we've got here, we've got a little section in Williamson, and then south of that, that section where there's only green on one side is in Travis County. And then the spot below that where it's green on both sides is the city limit. So it sounds like the agreement we have in front of us is only the city limits portion. So that may be... relevant that may be accurate and the county's doing their own thing or not participating and we would only be doing the city limits portion because i don't think we want to pay for the full county portion but we need to we need to let this uh go to a…”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:26:17
“Well, Faber is in the green on both sides.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:27:06
“So yeah, we need clarity. We need clarity. That brings us to item 5G.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:27:22
“That was funny. I haven't heard a motion to approve. How's that? So we'll move forward for lack of action.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:27:41
“Make it official. Apparently David moved to postpone for three weeks and Rudy seconded.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:27:54
“Right there. That brings us to item 5G. 5G is an interlocal agreement between the city of Pflugerville and the city of Hearst for... comparative governmental purchasing and authorizing the use of the City of Hearst contract for high density mineral bond seal service, HA5, in an amount not to exceed $670,000. This is our annual road maintenance ceiling that make sure we get, I think they claim, up to five additional years of usage out of the roadway. David, you had questions?”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:28:58
“I don't know if someone would like to explain contracting.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:29:04
“I've got a motion from Jonathan and a second from Kimberly. Okay.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:29:33
“i know we've had it in our contracts before and we've had to approve other people using our contracts yeah yeah so please tell us uh why we went this way the great city of hearst sure so good evening mayor council for the record matt rector your director of engineering um so this”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:30:57
“Thank you very much. I believe that is the end of our consent agenda. Wait, we're not done? We're not done. Oh, Lord. We're not done. We had items in the work session that we didn't get to. Those are repeated on the agenda, so I'm going to call... Wait, what did we do?”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 4:31:16
“6H. 6H, 6I, 6J, and 6K. 6H is an executive session item consultation with legal counsel pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code regarding SH45LP, the city of Pflugerville, cause number D1GN25008952 in the Core 55th Judicial District. County of Travis County, Texas. Item 6i is executive session deliberation regarding real property and economic development negotiations pursuant to section 551.072 and 551.087 of the Texas Government Code related to Project Mud Tower. Item 6j is deliberations regarding economic development pursuant to section 551.087 of the Texas Government Code…”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 5:30:04
“He's gone. He's gone. He's gone. Councilmember Ruiz. Yes. Councilmember Rogers. Yes. Councilmember Mateer. Amen. Councilmember Ryan.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 5:30:19
“It only counts if you say yes. It's in the charter.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 5:30:26
“I called Mayor Pro Tem. I said yes. Yes, Rudy. Oh my gosh. I guess yes.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 5:30:50
“All right. That being the final item on our agenda, seeing no other business remaining, it is 1025. We are adjourned.”
City Council · Sep 22, 2026
- Play at 5:44
“Good afternoon, everyone. The time is 5.01. I'm going to call to order this work session of the Pflugerville City Council on Tuesday, September 8, 2026. Our first item on the agenda is public comment. I don't believe we have any public comment for the work sessions. We will move forward to our regular agenda. This is a presentation and discussion regarding Unified Development Code amendments. Director Bailey.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 14:33
“Sure. I just want to make sure I understood what you were saying and what you're recommending there. Are you saying that we should amend existing districts to allow for these uses rather than add new districts?”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 15:34
“It sounds like you landed on this scenario. And can you tell me, I'm curious how large the impact would be. I'm imagining that most existing SFRs that way because it's already under construction or complete? Is there a lot of infill opportunity that's already zoned SFR?”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 16:28
“I mean, I live in a duplex in Falcon Point.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 16:43
“Right. I'm just trying to understand, Jonathan making the recommendation that we allow people to build these housing types without necessarily going through a rezoning effort if there's opportunities, if there's existing property within these districts. i just want to understand how practical that is and it sounds like it was considered previously and i'm curious why you ended up going this way rather than you know the the alternative approach sure um i can”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 18:28
“And obviously, yes, going through a rezoning process would be onerous, but I think we've denied some of those rezonings in the past as well. So there may be a good reason for going through that process. And I appreciate the perspective from the commissioner.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 20:26
“Yeah, that's a pro tem. Thank you for for voicing that. That's a concern of mine as well. I see a lot of the missing middle conversation centering around homes for rent and the built to rent product and not necessarily about the smaller units for ownership. And I'm wondering, is there something we can do in the development code that provides us with more of an opportunity to nudge it in in favor of one versus the other? Obviously, we've got the ability to develop in a condo regime without subdividing the parcels. I feel like subdividing the parcels may make it more likely to be ownership…”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 23:11
“Jonathan, I think you still had another question.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026