Remarks by Don Noble
185 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 5 of 8
- Play at 10:11
“So I will make a motion to approve case number C7830.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 25:35
“Yeah, that's just an easement line. That hash line is just easement. So it would be from your property line, 81 feet further south and west. And you can get online and you can look up, what is it, PD 216. And you can read all of the aspects of that and you will learn what they can and cannot do.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 31:54
“I'll just chime in, too. I would wholeheartedly agree and vote in approval of this today, but would appreciate you to communicate with the neighbors prior to construction and just be neighborly.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 36:05
“But you would learn everything you'd want to learn from the PUD. So read the existing PUD, and that will tell you what they can and cannot do. Right, right.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 42:51
“And I'll just say one thing, that the lot sizes on this are actually a little bit bigger than the minimal standard, so it's also a good thing.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 43:01
“And if there's no other questions, I would like to recommend approval of PC11012.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 45:07
“We do have that property being rezoned that is to the west. I think there was a note maybe in that one to work with the developer on the stub.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 46:02
“Okay. We do have that property that is straight west that we could,”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 48:46
“I will make a motion to approve the variance to section 5.3.1D.5 of the subdivision regulation.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 49:06
“And now for the item. I will make a motion to recommend approval of case number C7829.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 52:14
“And just one question to make sure that everybody is in agreement to add the 10.28 acres to that northwest section to complete so that we don't have one more.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 53:33
“With that, I would like to make a motion to approve CPA 260007 with the additional 10.28 acres, making the amendment total of 116.21 acres.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 58:46
“I'd like to say something on that, too. I mean, for me, I'd like to see it a public road. You have a public road all through the R1 single-family neighborhood. Tie that all the way through. It's just better access. There's so many homes in there.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 59:17
“I agree. It just gives a lot more options for a lot of traveling public. I can see you can still keep the Track 3, the R4 separate in itself, but that flag would be public.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 59:50
“No, gating the front of the apartments, but that. Yeah, you can gate the apartment complex.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:00:44
“Yes, just a couple more things too. We talked about the facade regulations. We can delete EFIS, sorry, TE5 deletion of EFIS. On the whole thing? Yes, across the board. And you want to just still keep that the same for all three tracks and not make a separate one for the single family? You don't want to do that?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:01:45
“The TE3 and the how to figure that as a 50% that no more than lots could be 40 foot in width. In talking to the subdivision regulations through those, it's really hard for them to figure that out and to not know a number. I know getting a number is also very difficult.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:02:31
“And the other part of that, I mean, the width or the depth of these lots are all different, right? So I just would rather see something that said something that there'd be... you know, a minimum of 50% of the lots were 5,500 square feet, or something like that. Getting to the same definition and meaning.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:03:53
“Correct. 9.7 is the one that's just that last sentence, that's right. That's right. And then we're good on the street stubs, the one to the... Yeah, we'll just agree to TE1. And the access. Oh, you're right. You want to have Barry come up and talk about... No, we don't need to do that. We don't need to do that? No. Okay.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:04:34
“We just want to make sure that we're right on the drainage portion of the... Something tells me that the staff will ensure that whatever drainage is required happens.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:04:55
“I will make a motion to recommend approval of PUD 2140 with TE's number... One, number two, the additional number three, as stated.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:05:24
“Within tract one. Yep. You got that? And then TE number 4, you want to restate that?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:07:00
“And it has the 1,340 feet between the parks? We have the distance required. Thank you.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:09:17
“With that, I will make a motion to approve CPA 2600012.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:10:39
“Straight zoning to R1. I would like to make a motion to recommend approval of PC 11008.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026