Remarks by Don Noble
185 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 8
- Play at 1:32:47
“Yeah, if you don't want to change anything on that, then you don't have to.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 1:35:49
“Just the one with the church being within 300 feet, they need to get some kind of a letter of approval from the church to go forward. You still have to get that? Correct.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 1:36:09
“It's not a special permit, though, right? It's basically just that they're saying they're okay with the idea.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:09:29
“Thanks, and I did attend that meeting and also was convinced somewhat that it would be a down zone from... the potential other uses that were allowed in the original PUD that was done in 2004. I'd like to hear from everybody else after listening to the public.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:11:01
“There's an existing 20, I mean, existing eight foot tall site put fence on the backside of all those properties.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:11:44
“Some of the other concerns were the traffic. So the use of the noise in the traffic, that's really the only concerns that I heard.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:12:49
“So in my opinion, from the land use point of view, maybe we need to take out some of the uses that are within the application itself. But the addition of that use, I can see go with the property at that location.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:16:11
“And I'll say this. I think everyone that was at the meeting understood that part of it and kind of got on the side of this would be better than a potential alternative.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:19:29
“And the idea to remove the other, the fast food or anything else, I mean, you're not proposing that, or are you? No. Wait, say it again?”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:21:47
“That's already in the spud. The tree spacing and all that. Correct. Nate, you good?”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:21:56
“Okay, and then I'll also say that this is a recommendation to the city council, so there will be in eight weeks another opportunity to talk with the council. With that, I will make a motion to recommend approval of SBUD 1869 with the striking TE 1 and 2 and adding 3, 4, and 5 as read into the record.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:25:46
“Right, and will be very much affected by some of the code update. Yeah, yeah. Yeah.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:26:05
“Dennis and I talked about that a little bit today. We're going to do everything we can that we do as much as we can to get it in a better spot before we get the approval and then all the complaints. Yeah, right.”
Planning Commission · Sep 24, 2026
- Play at 2:44
“Chair, I'd like to make a motion to receive the minutes of August 27 2026 meeting I”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 4:14
“I'd like to make a motion to approve the uncontested continuance request as read.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 5:14
“I'd like to make a motion to approve the new continuance requests as read.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 12:58
“So, and I just had a question. So the boundary that we're seeing overall is the South Oklahoma City...”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 13:08
“But inside that plan are the individual increment districts, and they're really the only ones affected by the TIF?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 13:36
“So the overall area, those funds, the additional funds can be spent within.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 13:44
“You're getting them, capturing just from the five.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 28:47
“So what I'd like to do before we just strike it is to hear from the author or the public works department who has asked for the TE and the reasoning for such.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 29:15
“It's a review process within public works in the engineering department. It goes back and forth between the engineer and the public works department through that review process.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 34:53
“So I was obviously on that board and working on that appeal. I agree with everything that everyone said. I believe that the wording stating that they cannot appeal to the Board of Adjustments is strongly worded. It was put together by the legal staff, that wording, so they were in improvement with it. This is a stopgap. To say that they already had time to create an amendment to the ordinance is probably not accurate. Doing an amendment to an ordinance takes a little bit of time. It's not something as simple as a few weeks in a council meeting. I'd rather give it additional teeth. Something…”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 47:03
“Well, before you do, I just want to say, because I'm going to vote against it again, I just want to make sure you understand that I believe this needs to be parked in some way, some fashion, maybe not 100%, definitely not to the existing code or minimums, but just somewhat parked for a commercial and a residential development of this size in this area. But just wanted you to definitely understand.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 48:56
“One other question. On the units, you're down to seven units. What are they as far as the bedroom count?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026