Remarks by Dalton Glasscock
40 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 2
- Play at 1:04:36
“Thank you. Thank you for answering all my questions.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:36:34
“So the recommended motion by staff, what does it do with the boat? Because I haven't heard from anybody that they're interested in saving. If somebody is interested in saving the boat, please say it during public comment. But what is the recommendation from staff regarding the boat?”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 1:49:33
“Thank you. I was just going to say, I don't think DAP4 needs a presentation. I'll ask them at the end. I ask for feedback about whatever's coming to council, but it'll be more of, hey, what is the potential for the river as a whole asset? What could be the best use of this? So I'll keep it pretty casual. I don't need a huge staff presentation and just get feedback from residents in the district.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:02:46
“Thank you, Mayor. Paul, can we go back to slide 48?”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:02:51
“Yes, that's perfect. So that top right, it says the 9-16-2025 City Council meeting. I went through all the minutes from that meeting and could not find... the approximate value at 18 million. Everything that I had seen was close to around the 12 million. So where, was that in a slide presentation? Because it wasn't in the minutes when I went”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:03:30
“Sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt. So does that mean staff knew about the projected cost at $18 million, but that wasn't presented to Council at that time?”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:03:40
“Okay, I would probably prefer that conversation at the 916 meeting if staff was aware that there would be additional maybe cost associated with the project but that wasn't presented to council. So I find that a little bit misleading because I tried to review all the minutes and couldn't find that. When we look at the bottom of the original estimate versus the revised estimate as well. So the recommended action from staff is to approve the original estimate at $18,391,606. But the revised estimate from staff is the $14,638,142. why would the recommendation to this body be approving the total…”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:04:42
“Or the budget could be reduced to compensate for the $5 million in federal funds.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:05:31
“Thank you for all the clarification. I have no challenge accepting the federal funds or the donation for this project in a way to offset the GO cost. I think that's a really smart maneuver, and I know that doesn't include... the design elements and that doesn't include the art elements as well. So I think that component makes sense. My concern is that when this originally was presented to council and voted on it, it was closer to 10 million. 10 million something. The revised estimate then came up to 12 million. Now we're going up to 18 million, but it may only cost us 14 million. So I still…”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:33:35
“Thank you, Mayor. As I said earlier, I'm interested in figuring out a way to accept the WAMPO funds and also the donation, but not increase the budget. And I don't know if there's appetite among my fellow council members to do so, but the bridge was already included in the original project amount when it came before this council at 12 million. And I think being a good steward also means completing it with the commitments we already made. Just in terms of scheduling, the existing budget that we approved was $12,118,061, and that was on December 23rd, 2025. And I understand there's a difference…”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:29:27
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:34:05
“take into account the weight that you would like to give that letter can the letter be provided to all of us again you guys have it in your email multiple times and I have a copy here if you'd like it I also have a request could you clear the board so if we have further questions we could go on to the board”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:36:45
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:36:58
“So it would still go through council or go through council or MAPCD or MAPC. It would go through DAB and come back to council if there were to be any requested changes to.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:47:09
“Mayor, I would move that we approve the supplemental agreement and authorize the necessary signatures.”
City Council · Sep 8, 2026