Remarks by Chris Harrison
59 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 3
- Play at 56:03
“Peter Schaefer who is not here, I believe but Among others and just the reason for the question is just to make sure that he wasn't serving as the proxy And then listen to it. I'm sure just want to be clear Thank you.”
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 1:32:43
“Sure, not a problem. Of course, this has been a spirited debate for quite some time regarding this, and there has been a shift. I've had an opportunity to confer with both councils, but I do want to get the commission's positioning on this from a more seasoned standpoint if there's anyone else that would like to contribute.”
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 1:43:48
“And if they want to make those changes, they come back with the PUD and SPUD. Sure. And that's exactly where I'm sitting now. If those changes need to come, they will come back and report this body in the correct form and fashion. But if I don't hear anything else from any further commissioners, I'm going to go ahead and move for approval.”
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 1:44:54
“Mr. Chair. Yeah. I've made my motion. You ready?”
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 1:46:59
“All right. I don't have anyone to speak. Okay. Commissars, do you all have any concerns or questions for the applicant?”
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 1:48:12
“And does the applicant have any hardly use they think they're going to see?”
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 1:49:06
“Anyone else? And I know this piece of property well, it's just oddly constructive. It's just odd.”
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 2:05:28
“It's the same existing legal description. There's not going to be an additional structure. The entries and exits are going to go back to originally what they are, and that needs to be added as TE number 7.”
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 2:05:38
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 2:09:15
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 27, 2026
- Play at 8:14
“Sure, is there any comments from any other commissioners? If not... I recommend we want to move to accept the variance first for SV0010.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 40:55
“All right, if not, then I move approval for PC 11009.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:20:58
“Okay. Commissioners, I did get a chance to speak with some of the neighbors as well and Caitlin and I kind of discussed some of the things that they went over in the meeting. As long as the use stays as intended, I think that we're moving in the correct direction. I did have one question for David, and that was about the entering and exiting of, say, semi-trucks or how they would move the fabricating metal away from the premises. Once per week. Okay.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:21:28
“And what type of vehicle is it? Semi-trailer. It will be semi-trailer. Okay, and with the fabrication, are we looking at any pollutants? Are we looking at any noise problems?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:21:42
“Commissioners, do you all have anything? I think we're ready for a motion.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:28:25
“Okay. No one else signed up to speak. At this time, I will recommend approval of item PUD 2146 to the City Council.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:40:11
“Commissars, are there any concerns that we can see currently?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:43:25
“Height, three stories, 35 feet. If the applicant is amenable, I will move for approval of split 18-4. I had one more thing. Oh, go ahead.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:46:57
“So currently, can you give me the three tees? I have height at 35 feet. I have setback at 10. And then we still are concerned about the landscape buffer under the C3.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:55:45
“So my question to the applicant is how much time do you need?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:56:42
“Yes. We'll just defer this item until September 10th.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:04:31
“I was gonna let her run with it. Yeah, definitely. But yes, those who have signed up, if we could hear them first, please.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:33:17
“Would you like to start us off, Commissioner Harrison? Sure. Actually, Commissioner Powers and I were at the, as well as Commissioner Milner, were at the meeting, and could you go back over some of the points we touched on originally? Even though I see what staff has done here, I think we still have some digging to do.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:36:29
“I'd have to be in agreement as well. Even though I'm looking at what staff has put together, I'd be more inclined to see the applicant go back, work a little further with staff and the neighborhood to reach what I would want to call a happy meeting. But at this point, I'm not there yet as well.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:38:19
“Yeah, I totally agree with that. Yeah, that's kind of the space I'm in right now as well.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026