Remarks by Brittany Davis
228 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 6 of 10
- Play at 15:50
“All right. Thank you, Nick. And no public comment? Russell Gouley. All good? Okay. Thank you. We'll close public comment and make a motion or open for more discussion.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 16:04
“All right. Motion from Lyndon, second from Mark. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Okay, we're back to page one. Our last subdivision plot that we'll discuss this morning is item number two, which is FP26-16, Baker Ranch, section seven, which is SMD number one. a request to final plant 21 lots over 7.627 acres within the single-family residential RS1 and low-rise multifamily legacy RM1L zoning districts in a request for full variance not to extend Twin Mountain Drive.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 24:57
“Okay, Aaron, can you go back to the just aerial map, please? Okay, so does the owner of the land on ruth lane are they the same owner as the owner of the other side of twin mountain currently yes so basically as a planning commission if we were to say no you do not need to develop twin mountain later on unless they sold off southwest track or south track they would essentially still have to develop it they just don't want to do it now”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 26:02
“And how many homes can be adequate without having a fire safety issue? Because we've looked at this in other developments, and there was temporary turnarounds required and all sorts of stuff that weren't just glitchy. It was like paved.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 27:51
“I'm trying to load the future thoroughfare map, and of course it's Monday and my internet doesn't like me. What is Twin Mountain considered? Is that a minor collector? Is that a major collector?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 29:17
“The only reason why I'm asking the question is we always talk about not deferring development costs on to the next guy. And I just want to make sure that when we make this decision that we're not just kicking the can down the road like we discuss in every single meeting.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 29:46
“All right. That's all my questions. Anything from any other members? No? Okay. All right. We'll go ahead and open up public comment.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 32:05
“And as far as the sidewalk item number three, you guys are on the same page with city staff on this?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 32:21
“Okay, with that, if we don't, we'll close public comment. Open for discussion or motion.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 32:55
“So currently they're just left to stub out. They're not required to do anything additional to...”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 33:33
“Okay. Thank you so much, Eric. Okay. With that, do we have a motion or any other discussion? Okay. We did close public comment. I just need to confirm that we're okay with opening public comment again. Okay. Please come ahead.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 35:15
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 35:33
“A second from Jennifer, all in favor? Aye. All right, six, zero. Okay, our next item of discussion today is item B, which is rezonings and the comprehensive plan. Gosh, I can't even talk today, hello Monday. City Council's final three for approval of rezonings and amendments to the comprehensive plan. We have multiple items today to discuss on this. Our first is number one, which is Z26-13, 3 East 19th Street, which is SMD number 3, a request for a zone change from General Heavy Commercial, CGCH, to General Commercial, located at 3 East 9th Street.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 38:44
“So really, we're just down to them. We're taking the heavy commercial off the table for the applicant. Yes, exactly. Okay.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 39:31
“OK. All right. Thank you, Nick. Do we have any public comment on this?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 39:36
“So we will close public comment and open up for discussion or motion.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 39:44
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 42:52
“Okay. All right. Do we have any public comment, Ray? Vicki Vines?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 46:43
“Thank you, Erin. And I believe the applicant's here, but I'll do my best to answer a few things. So first off, any time you're building in and around a floodplain, and again, I'm not an engineer by any means, but I've worked alongside builders through some of these projects. you have to follow very, very, very specific FEMA guidelines. So as far as the height of the homes, disrupting actually the flow of natural water through there, it's very, very specific. If there's any... sewer lines or anything that would have to go through there. They would have to be encased per FEMA standards. So it's…”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 48:52
“Right. Well, and again, that's all stuff that the city will sit down with the applicant and with their specific engineer and make sure, again, the water lines are adequate, the sewer lines are adequate, you know, because the standards when... stoneham and stonewall were built compared to the standards that the city expects now are different so that's all stuff that they'll take care of for sure so and again i think the applicants here that might get up and speak a little bit so okay thank you thank you so much aaron okay roland anderson morning i'm not a speaker but uh”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 49:50
“Again, that would be something that the engineer and the applicant would discuss. I think it's going to depend also, again, on the FEMA guidelines on what they will allow. But, again, the applicant probably can answer some of the unknowns. I'm just going off of previous floodway maps I've looked at.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 50:49
“So we've owned property over there. I know this. So, you know, parts progress.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 51:05
“Yes, sir. And again, anytime that you build near a FEMA floodplain, there are very specific standards as far as the grade of the home, all of that, as far as like if it needs to tear up. what you're actually allowed to dig in within the floodplain. You can't make ponds or retention or anything like that. It's very, very, very specific. And as far as your concern on level of traffic, again, we completely understand that. St. Angelo is a growing community. We do need more housing. But again, the city will sit down with the applicant and with their engineer and make sure that there's adequate…”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 52:44
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 55:18
“Thanks, Russell. OK. OK, we're going to go ahead and close public comment on this item and open up for discussion or a motion. Personally, I understand some of the public's concern in regards to this. This has been land that has sat vacant for a very, very long time. And I am happy to see some of the development on it. And I think that, again, going back to all the conversations we've had about affordable housing, um this definitely gives some options um whether you know the owner decides to keep them as rentals and rents to maybe some military families that are right there or if they decide…”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026