Remarks by Brittany Davis
228 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 3 of 10
- Play at 43:19
“Okay, after this, we are closing public comment officially.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 43:40
“All right, public comment on this item is officially closed. No further public comment.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 45:34
“And again, we see a lot of these, you know, with the lake being annexed into the city forever ago, the streets weren't built to the width that we expect and whatnot. Again, it is a recreational body of water. And, you know, again, just like... If you choose to live on, I say this every time that we have a lake one, if you choose to live on a recreational golf course, you can't stop golfers from parking in front of your fence and having their music. If you live on a lake, you can't force people to not drive by your home on their boat. i do agree that you know there is danger being on the water…”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 48:08
“All right, any other thoughts? Was that a motion to add that or is that just a comment? I think a comment.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 48:17
“Okay, any other comments or concerns? Anyone like to move forward with a motion?”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 48:35
“Okay, so we have a motion from Linden. And again, what is the parking?”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 48:42
“What is the parking limitation? It should be four. Over in that neighborhood off Shady Point, is there like a, there's not a public area that you can park a boat trailer? Sorry.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 49:02
“So I think that the applicant needs a plan for anyone that has a trailer, so that way it's not blocking the neighbors or interfering with, because it is such a narrow drive, people coming and going.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 49:32
“Here's my motion. Okay. Motion from Lyndon with some restrictions. Do we have a second? I'll second that. Okay. Second from Liz. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Are you a nay or a yay? I'm a nay. Okay. So we have a 6-1 on that one. Okay. Thank you all. And thank you for everyone that showed up for that. Okay, our second CU case today is CU 26-17, 115 Hildago, which is SMD number one, a request for conditional use to allow a short-term rental located at 115 Hildago.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 51:20
“Normally, auto turns on for me. You gave me the broken one today. Okay, any questions for Nicholas? No? Okay. Do we have any public comment? No?”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 51:32
“Well, with that, we'll open for discussion or a motion.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 51:40
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:07:28
“And so, you know, as a commission, I think a lot of us sat back and said, okay, what does this really look like in this neighborhood? And so thank you for the visual. Thank you for the site plan, even though it was a different address. That definitely helped me personally. I'm sure it helped some other people up here too. So what questions do we have for Erin before we open for public?”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:08:25
“Yeah, I think the biggest difference was just because it was a quad, or sorry, a duplex and they were going to make it a triplex.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:09:14
“Yeah, because I believe you said there was five spots. There's five spots on that lot.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:09:41
“So if they did three triplexes, they would have to be required 10 spots plus a circle drive? Or can you go back to how many parking spaces? Is it two per unit in our assistance? That is correct, yes. Okay. And the lot size is adequate for at least 10 spaces?”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:10:04
“Okay, perfect. Any other questions for Aaron? Ray, do we have public? Okay, perfect. All right, if we don't have any other questions for Aaron, we'll open up public comment. Oh, sorry. Yeah, go ahead.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:11:07
“But if they did a duplex, I'm just looking at it as, okay, so you drive around, and I don't know what the frontage on some of these are, but some of the duplexes, you've got, like, very very limited parking this allows circle drive adequate parking hopefully not as much on street parking if somebody had two vehicles right whereas again like with it if you did two duplexes on these lots They could just have a front-facing drive and then a very large backyard technically, right?”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:12:07
“So, and this is just my opinion on this, so even if you did an RS-2, depending on the configuration, it could look like it was a higher density than what this, this looks private, this looks very nice, very well maintained, you know, and again, as adequately parking for the structure type.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:12:39
“Thank you. Okay. Let's get some public comment going. Who do we have?”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:12:58
“So we just need to move his public comment to the next item. Okay, perfect. So if there's no other public comment on Mark Street, we will go for closed public comment and open for further discussion or motion. Erin, can you bring back the numbers? And thank you again. I know that took some time, but that's extremely helpful on a taxable basis, especially knowing kind of what we look at as fire and police costs. So that's all the surrounding properties. Can you go to the slide that has the... You had it based on like if this is how much a quadplex, this is tri, or sorry, duplex, single. There…”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:14:06
“That was the photo of the front with the circle drive. That was a project. That is on Forest Street over in Angelo Heights. It's a forest in 44.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:15:38
“So, and can you go back to the zoning map you had? This? No, the overall. Thank you. Perfect. So, our red sun is the subject property. Yes, ma'am. And the orange block north of that is?”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:16:08
“So again, I know that everyone is always a little apprehensive when it comes to new zoning and whatnot, but for the public that isn't aware of this, there was a task force team set up in order to create some of these new zoning districts, something that the city needs, something that researchers have come to us saying, you need affordable housing. The way a city grows is by affordable housing. That's how we get businesses to come to St. Angelo if they have places for their employees to live that are affordable. As Aaron said, this is not a HUD project, this is just general affordable housing…”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026
- Play at 1:18:17
“And again, in order to go to an STR, which is always everyone's question when we look at multiple units, it would have to be on a case-by-case scenario because it's not under an RF zoning. The applicant would still have to come in front of the city and go through all of the correct channels. That is correct.”
Planning Commission · Sep 21, 2026