Remarks by Brian Corey

79 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 4

  1. Play at 1:07
    “Hug it. I can help you. It'll be like an Iwo Jima moment.”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  2. Play at 1:14
    “All right, so next up is public remarks. I don't know if everyone had a chance to fill out the sheet in the back of the room. When I call your name, if you could just come up to the podium, give your address, please. One moment. Thank you very much. First up is Reynold Martin. Welcome, Reynold. Good, thank you. You might have to turn the microphone on.”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  3. Play at 2:16
    “I think that's OK. Yeah. We'll call you back up when the initiative.”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  4. Play at 2:22
    “Right. So they won't be able to. OK. Well, it is a presentation. So it's going to be coming up soon. So if you'd like to speak, you could speak now. Sorry about that.”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  5. Play at 3:24
    “Thank you very much, Randall. Next up is Darren Rizzo.”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  6. Play at 3:50
    “Okay, great. We'll reserve your comments for the presentation.”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  7. Play at 4:03
    “And there's one more name down here. I'm probably going to butcher it. I can't quite see. I think it's Sasha. OK, great. So we'll call you up at that time. All right. Thank you very much. Is there anybody online?”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  8. Play at 4:31
    “ALL RIGHT, GREAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SO THAT WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS. AND IF WE COULD MOVE INTO THE FIRST PRESENTATION, PLEASE. I BELIEVE CITY MANAGER, YOU'RE TAKING THIS ONE?”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  9. Play at 8:19
    “Can you come up for a picture, please? And we're doing the proclamation now.”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  10. Play at 24:45

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  11. Play at 51:20
    “Thank you. Thank you very much for the presentation. Very, very interesting creative project. I just had two questions, and maybe you can bring this with the further analysis as well. It looks like from here that you would probably need to have 40 times the waste that we're providing to make the project viable. I just wonder if you've done analysis of the area in the region and how many people, what percentage of the market you need to do to achieve that. It would be nice to know how you envision that happening, where you can be competitive. Because obviously, if it goes too far away, people…”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  12. Play at 53:02
    “Yes. And obviously, this is your business model, but it's all contingent on RSH being something people want to buy. So I'd love to see what that looks like. Obviously, we could do our own research on it on the global market for that and demand and trends for that for the last five, 10 years or however long it is.”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  13. Play at 1:10:46
    “Is there any way you could break down? I know you had the 80-year picture, but like the annual financial picture of the benefits to the city?”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  14. Play at 1:29:16
    “Yeah, that's the biggest news But no we're in the same field so I've always appreciated him so much I mean just four years ago was the first time we as a city sent out Newsletters and to come from from where we are then to where we are now is incredible redoing a municipal website is done the easy thing I think you you know Did an amazing job there, amazing job on social, amazing job on just, you know, really doing the kind of outreach and media that you've done for the city. So thank you.”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  15. Play at 1:47:54
    “Um, yeah. So obviously I was part of the commission even while some of these studies were being approved and eventually when we decided not to do it, I think now I've kind of come to the conclusion that I think a lot of the positives of this can be accomplished for less money in different ways. If we're looking for much nicer signage or to potentially pacify US 1 if we can, not that the road belongs to us, but different ways of doing that, that might be better money spent and less of a risk on our part to be able to do it, beautify it, pacify it, come up with signage that can help us, things…”

    City Commission · Jul 21, 2026

  16. Play at 16:02
    “Mr. Vice Mayor. Thank you. And obviously, I'm a fan of this. I was curious, though, because we did a similar traffic study maybe about four years ago or so. And I do recall that a lot of the focus ended up being in probably what will end up being one of the zones. ARE WE CONFIDENT THAT WE'LL BE ABLE TO GET TRAFFIC MITIGATION IN THE OTHER ZONES? BECAUSE IT WAS PRETTY SPARSE IN THE REMAINING ZONES AFTER THAT STUDY WAS COMPLETED. AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE TRAFFIC COUNTS HAVE CHANGED ALL THAT DRAMATICALLY. IS IT POSSIBLE THAT WE'LL EXECUTE THIS STUDY AND SOME OF THE OTHER ZONES WILL STILL NOT GET…”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

  17. Play at 1:04:36
    “Yes, sir. You're recognized. Just a quick question because we discussed the Dante Vassell building, but I'm not sure if we gave the direction. Would the direction be to leave the line item but potentially look into privatization?”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

  18. Play at 1:25:43
    “I was curious, the estimated, I guess, revenue that we would have or generate from the tree fund at sort of $25,000 a year, is that how much we're expecting to bring in from people paying through permits or anything like that? Because I have seen that number be bigger in years past, and certainly that fund's gotten over $100,000 in it prior to us actually executing on it. I don't know if that was a buildup of four years or if it'll, you know... What would you say on average we're going to be getting from that?”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

  19. Play at 2:03:30
    “Would the language on the ballot be kind of contingent on the reduction?”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

  20. Play at 2:04:22
    “Certainly have a better quality life And I think a reason that that makes a lot of sense is basically if this gets passed It's gonna be very unlikely. We're gonna be able to use that geo be money the way that we originally intended Yeah, and I and I would rather rely on”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

  21. Play at 40:29
    “Hi, so he had mentioned the bonding proof as a point, but you didn't mention that. Was that not a division? He complied with bonding, yes. Okay, thank you very much.”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

  22. Play at 45:52
    “For me, I just want to say, I mean, based on what it sounds like, it seems like it was fair by our processes. And just looking at the price, it is below the median of range within the proposal. So I'm not as concerned on the price side. Obviously, one was more affordable than others, but we followed it fairly, and it's below the median.”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

  23. Play at 1:04:28
    “Mr. Vice Mayor. Thank you. I just had two questions. One, do you happen to know, just off the top of your head, what percentage of people end up using this through the pay by phone app, using the actual wayfinding and maps?”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

  24. Play at 1:05:37
    “Yes, and the second question, I was excited to hear that most people end up adopting it at year two, and the free model for the first year is obviously amazing. I'm curious what type of KPIs or ROI do they look at to say, wow, I really wanna do this for the second year?”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

  25. Play at 1:22:59
    “Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Any comments or questions? No, no, nothing from over here.”

    City Commission · Jun 9, 2026

Back to Brian Corey’s profile