Remarks by Bonnie Smith
10 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
- Play at 13:24
“I agree. I have no issues. Very similar to what we saw before.”
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026
- Play at 21:44
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026
- Play at 29:53
“just read a little bright and maybe in real life it doesn't read that bright but that's just based on the information i have that's where i am so thank you thank you mrs smith um i agree with uh mrs apple's statement that the uh the green is very bright and then also the lemons i didn't really object to i saw them more as art but uh if we're going to go with fewer lemons i'd be open to that”
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026
- Play at 43:09
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026
- Play at 54:01
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026
- Play at 1:03:33
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026
- Play at 1:19:34
“The building looks great. I had the same concerns for queuing and drop off and then also for the playground safety. So but I know you guys will work that out. So I'm good.”
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026
- Play at 1:30:51
“yes and that i just want so that's where we are um yeah okay those were my my primary concerns so so thank you but we will need to see what is going to be used to replace the efis thank you thank you mrs smith okay uh i did see the traffic uh study that you had done i guess we'll know how it really the way people use it and how it affects the traffic when when it's constructed um And then, of course, the Ephus is kind of a hard point with the City of Westlake.”
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026
- Play at 1:41:05
“It looks good. I appreciate you coming back.”
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026
- Play at 2:16:53
“I would agree the size of the store is a real issue for me. It's almost 60% larger than it is. It's it's a lot larger than what we would grant within our zoning code. And then I had issue with the size of the convenience store within that store. So our ratio is 33% of a 3000 square foot store. So I would look for sheets I mean, if it's going, we can't prohibit a gas station, we can't prohibit convenience stores, but I would look for it to conform to our zoning code. And my fellow commissioners stated other things very eloquently, no need to repeat.”
Planning Commission · Sep 14, 2026