Remarks by Angelica M. Ballestas
8 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
- Play at 3:56
“Good morning. Angelica Ballestas, representing school board member Danny Spino.”
Attendence Boundary Committee · Feb 19, 2026
- Play at 2:21:03
“Through the chair, piggyback off of that, I believe that the asset management falls outside of our purview as a committee. And while it is nice, I think it does put a burden within the administration to come back to us with those plans. However, if possible, yes, very nice, but it does fall very well outside of our purview.”
Attendence Boundary Committee · Feb 19, 2026
- Play at 2:24:54
“yes go ahead through the chair um i just wanted to to provide some comment some commentary to my fellow board members um so the school school board member danny's been hosted at town hall uh for this specific merger and it was very successful there was over 300 attendees and community output was highly present the majority of the community is in favor and actually the few negative thoughts were kind of doubt of the district being able to make it happen because they wanted to make it happen throughout the years. So I just wanted to make sure that you guys knew that we were present out in the…”
Attendence Boundary Committee · Feb 19, 2026
- Play at 2:43:38
“That's what you're saying, to the Air Base building.”
Attendence Boundary Committee · Feb 19, 2026
- Play at 2:45:04
“Through the chair, now being that that option has been explored and is a feasibility, do we have to vote on this today or could we have the administration come back to us with that proposal?”
Attendence Boundary Committee · Feb 19, 2026
- Play at 2:45:37
“Through the chair, may I make a motion to explore the secondary option that the administration may present to us at a later date?”
Attendence Boundary Committee · Feb 19, 2026
- Play at 2:47:47
“could it be procedurally correct to change the language to table the voting on the region's proposal?”
Attendence Boundary Committee · Feb 19, 2026
- Play at 2:56:00
“The motion as it stands now would be for the administration to come back with the with provides possibilities of the of the second option of the proposal that was the initial motion. I guess the confusion was between if that automatically meant it was an it was a no vote or not I guess legal counsel said if the purple if the staff a demonstration can come back with a proposal within the boundaries of time that we are currently in it would not automatically need that so the proposal would be for administration to take a break and explore the second option and come back to us within this…”
Attendence Boundary Committee · Feb 19, 2026