Remarks by Andrew Adams
94 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 4
- Play at 26:56
“Got it. So as to my question or the question on height, on building height, can you identify which building is similar just by picture? Like Jennifer had this picture here. Is that the building we're talking about?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 27:14
“Yeah, and this looks like all the Wadsworth stuff up there, right, that they've got. Which this is not, but we're saying the height would be almost identical to this.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 27:27
“And then where is that building, Jennifer, that you've got pictures of right here? If you just go back to that aerial. Did you say it was the one to the forefront?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 27:41
“That's it? Okay. Okay. Got it. Just to get our bearings. All right. Any other questions?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 28:12
“And I can, you saw my question about the tree diamonds. I pulled up an aerial here. They're already there, darn it.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 28:41
“So if you go to the aerial, Jennifer, just to see the – I mean, I've just got my Google Maps pulled up here so I can see. There are tree diamonds on your parcel, and the one to the north has no tree diamonds.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 28:56
“It would match. So that is – I mean, I don't get a vote, but that is my preference is that if there is a tree diamond there that doesn't have a tree in it and it's just no water supply, that's why there's no tree in there. then I'd just rather have nothing than a tree diamond.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 29:14
“Perfect. That's the kind we hate. Well, we don't hate anyone or anything, but that's the kind that we would rather not install or repair.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 29:22
“All right. So that deviation is already requested, so that's my only. That's just it. Other than flying a red balloon for height, which we don't need to because we've already got a building there to scale from. Okay. Those are my only two points. Anything else from you guys?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 30:48
“Perfect. Do you need to explain your prior life? Just for those that don't know. I think it's interesting.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 30:57
“So Susan knows her stuff. So there you go. So people aren't like, you weren't a hit man or anything. I just wanted to clarify that. It was very mysterious. We know that up here, but we want to make sure that we've got to keep up. Thanks for clarifying that. You got it. It's safe. It's a safe environment. Susan's great. All right. So any other questions from you guys down here? Okay. Great. That's it. Public hearing. We'll invite you back up if we need to. Thank you. All right. This is a public hearing with the same guidelines as before. Who would like to address this agenda item? All right.…”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 32:38
“PERFECT. THANKS, SUSAN. WHO WILL SECOND HER MOTION?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 32:43
“Awesome. Thanks, Kendra. All right. So this is for a positive recommendation being sent off to the city council. So let's put this one to a vote. Susan, how do you vote?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 32:57
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 36:40
“A question about the last time it was in front of the city council. Were they using the language of age in place? And what was the beef? I guess I shouldn't say that because we wouldn't know because we weren't there. So what was the request? Was it identical to this one?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 37:14
“No, technically it was the same request. So just using now the age in place. Got it. Thank you. Great job. All right. Questions for staff on that one?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 38:00
“Perfect. Great job. See, Kendra, he did know. See, I just assumed that we didn't go back there. So great job, Nick. Appreciate that. Obviously, there's no site plan. This is just zoning. So where that would be cut down the middle, what have you, we have no idea on that. Well, now we can see.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 38:21
“That'll be great. Perfect. Good. Good questions.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 39:38
“And again, we'll ask the applicant when they come up, but it's good to see the existing home on there, right? If that were just a vacant lot, it's a good catch. Right.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 39:52
“Good. Okay. Well, no other questions for staff? All right. Is the applicant here? Hi, if you want to come on down, you've seen the drill. If you just state your name and then you can add anything you like.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 44:56
“I do have a couple quick questions about the existing property. What are the structures on the existing property right now? So see the two, is the casita the one that's furthest to the south there that's by the pool?”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 45:07
“And then what's this other little property there, that little structure? That looks almost like a pool house.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 45:16
“I've seen this property from Fort Street. I drive by it almost every day.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 45:23
“Got it. Got it. So I know we're not this far, but Nick, if you pull that picture back up there and this were going to be subdivided, we're allowing for a second lot, a second buildable lot, and I'm assuming that's the plan for finances.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026
- Play at 46:17
“Perfect. So that's where that new property line would be. Yeah.”
Planning Commission · Sep 10, 2026