Judiciary & Legislation Committee - Regular Meeting
The Judiciary & Legislation Committee addressed several license renewals and new applications, with notable discussions on public safety, compliance, and community impact. Several applications were approved with warning letters, while some were held for further review or denied due to unresolved issues or lack of communication.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Judiciary & Legislation Committee
- Meeting Type
- Judiciary & Legislation Committee
- Location
- Milwaukee, WI
- Meeting Date
- April 28, 2026
Transcript
2591 sections (from 2,840 segments)
I'm Alderman Joe Casta Zamarepa, chairperson of the committee, and I'm joined in the following order to my left by Alderman Peter Bergelis as well as Alderman Brower. We are expecting Vice Chair Pratt to log on virtually today and also Alderman Jackson should be joining us soon. We're also joined by Yadira Melendez, staff assistant. Good morning. Good morning.
Miss Fabiola Lopez, our license in license division assistant manager, attorney Travis Gresham from the office of the city attorney, Sergeants Velasquez, and Cornejo from Milwaukee Police Department. Morning. Good morning. The only item on the agenda is file number two five two two three four motion relating to the recommendations of the licenses committee relating to licenses. The first application at 9AM are a few class D operators license renewal applications beginning with Sierra Jarrett. Class D operators license renewal application. Is Sierra Jarrett present? All right. Is this the first time non appearance?
Second.
Move to move to now.
Alright. Alderman Peter Bergelis moves for denial. Any objection? Hearing none so ordered. Sierra can reapply, correct?
Correct.
Licenses division, thank you for that. We'll move on to our next 9AM agenda item. Christopher Deshawn McBeath, Class D opera I'm sorry, Class D Operator's License Renewal Application. Is Christopher Deshawn McBeath present? All right. License division, is this the first time nonappearance?
Yes, it's the first.
Right. Move to hold.
Alderman Peter Bergalis moves to hold this item to the call of the chair. And hearing no objection so ordered, we'll move on to our next 9AM agenda item, Joseph A. Ziegler, class D operator's license renewal application. Is Joseph A. Ziegler present?
Yeah, I'm here.
Alright. Good morning.
Good morning.
Mr. Ziegler, you'll raise your right hand, we'll get you sworn in.
Yeah. Don't know how turn the camera on
this right now.
I had it on earlier.
No. It's on. Your camera's on. It's there.
I don't see you, though. Okay.
Alright. Cool.
Alright. Yeah.
Okay. Sergeant Velasquez and Oh, yes. Can everybody raise
the hand that needs to get sworn in?
Do you solely affirm on the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give, is it true, whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Yes. Yes. Thank you.
Thank you, everyone. Alright. Mister Ziegler, are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied? Yeah. Thank you. Yes. Alright. And if you'll state your name and address for the record?
Joseph Ziegler, 12515 West Forest Drive, New Berlin, Wisconsin Wisconsin 5533151.
Okay. Thank you. Is there a police report, sergeant?
Yes. The applicant has a following past due of fines and own in Milwaukee Municipal Court as of today. Building code violations, $290.
Alright. Mister Ziegler, would you like to speak to the police report?
No. I I have everything's paid for now,
and I sent a copy of the receipt via email over to the license division.
Okay. Thank you.
And it's got a general email that was on the It's the bank. It was the first page of the letter that was sent to me. At the bottom, it was just the general license division one. But it was sent there with a paper receipt on it with my name and then the bartender license number.
Good. I'm glad you did that. License division, can you confirm?
I'll check with the
office. Okay.
Alright, miss Lopez will check with the office to ensure that we receive that. Further further questions on the police report from committee members? Alright. Well, with that, we can entertain a motion.
I'm sure I'll move approval. And if for whatever reason that wasn't taken care of, we can adjust it on the agenda, the special agenda prior to council.
Very good.
So we can follow-up with that later to confirm. We'll trust but verify.
Very good. Thank you, Alderman Bergalis. Alderman Bergalis has moved approval and of course, we'll adjust the matter if there for some reason we don't get confirmation that we received the copy of his payment. Any discussion or questions on the motion? Alright. Any objection? Hearing no objection so ordered. Alright. Congratulations. Good luck to you mister Ziegler.
Thank you. Appreciate it.
Thank you. Alright. We'll move on now to our 09:05AM agenda items. Beginning with Shannon Carlson, Class D, operator's license application. Good morning. Good morning. Yes, please have a seat. And we want a good morning. Alderman Jackson is here as well. Thank you, Alderman Jackson. Alright. Miss Carlson, will you raise your right hand and we'll get
you sworn in? Thank you so much for all the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony we're to give is the truth, whole truth, and the film of the truth? I do. Thank you.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Carlson, are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied? Yes. I am. Thank you. And will you state your name and address for the record?
Yes. My name first name is Shannon Carlson, c a r l s o n. My address is 1517 Manitoba Avenue, South Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53172. Thank you.
Alright. Sergeants, is there a police report?
Yes. On 12/03/2019, the applicant was arrested for OWI third. On 02/03/2025, she was convicted and her driver's license was revoked for life. On 12/2321, the applicant was arrested for OWI fourth. On 05/1724, she was convicted and her driver's license was revoked for thirty six months plus two hundred and forty days.
Okay. Alright. Would you like to speak to the police report?
Yes. I did jot down some notes and wrote you a letter. Today is it's very difficult having to admit to my past. So first and foremost, thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak with you today. I understand the seriousness of my record and the OWI convictions.
I take full responsibility for my poor choices that I made. It took some time in my life to realize that I did have an alcohol addiction. Since then, I have sought treatment. I have been in treatment since 2023. I continue with treatment on a weekly basis, doing both group and individual therapy, and I wouldn't go without it.
Sometimes I feel like everybody deserves a little therapy. Finding employment has been trying and difficult with my background. I did go an interview at Delaware North, which operates the Milwaukee Services Group at the stadium. I applied for a very entry level position, met with the supervisor, and we clicked. They offered me a supervisor position that is better pay, hours, and meets up with my experience in life.
So in order to do that, they do require that all management staff hold a bartender's license. Although you're not directly serving alcohol you are overseeing it. I am on probation. I did speak to and receive permission from my probation officer to even apply for the license attached to my application. There is a letter from her stating that I am in compliance.
It also attests to my random drug tests. On that you will also see a letter from my counselor stating and verifying my treatment dates. And then again my service a certificate. So I I'm I'm ashamed of my past. What I'm doing differently this time is I had to get to the bottom, the root of my issue, and I've done that.
So I am I understand it's a public safety issue, but I guarantee you I will never operate a motor vehicle again in my life, and I will never ever take a drop of alcohol in my life I know that I can't drink. So I'm hoping that with your permission. I could accept this position. All my training is completed I'm just waiting for the license and that's what it's based on.
Thank you very much for your remarks. Are there any questions from committee members at this time?
Madam chair.
On the police report, Alderman Bergelis?
Listen, I've I've worked at the stadium to help a church group work for Delaware North. I'm very familiar with how alcohol is regulated and it's very well, you think Brewers fans have a whole lot of fun, then they do.
They
do. But alcohol is very well controlled and regulated. I appreciate your candor and your honesty. It takes a lot of courage to sit up here at the table and share some really personal things with the committee. Have no objections on this license.
Oh, thank you.
So I'll move approval.
Very good. Alderman Peter Bergelis moves approval. Any discussion on that motion? Any objection? Hearing none so ordered. Good luck
to you.
Thank you. I appreciate you. Thank you.
And I promise you, I'll make you proud.
I have no doubt. Alright, we will move on now to our next nine zero five am agenda item. Connie M Peterson, Class D Operator's License Good Thank you for your patience. I know you're said you had to head to work as soon as you're done here. It's okay. If you'll raise your right hand, miss Peterson, we'll get
you sworn in. Do you solemnly affirm on the defense of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and a film of the truth?
Yes. Thank you. Alright. And are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied? Yes.
And my other question on that would be am I able to get my money back?
Could you speak a little bit louder I'm not sure what you're asking for.
If it is denied am I able to get my 85 Yeah,
you would be able to get a partial refund.
Okay. Alright. And can you pull the microphone close too so that we can make sure everybody can hear you? Okay. If you'll state your name and address for the record.
Sorry. Connie M Peterson 5998 South Phillips.
Okay. Did we get a sworn?
Yes.
That's Yes.
Okay. Yes. Mhmm.
Alright. Sergeant Courtney Ho, is there a police report?
At nine 06:25, the applicant was arrested for OWI third with the jury trial scheduled 05/18/2026.
Okay. Alright, would you like to speak to the police report, miss Peterson?
Yes. I I don't know how to say this. I was not prepared. I I've been very busy with my mom and work and everything. Okay. One, I'm not a drinker. I just happened to drink that day and it's what happened. The microphone closer to you. I feel like it's in my face already.
You can move it.
You can bend it towards you.
Whatever's going I
just wanna hear you well. There you
My my first and second were lots of years ago. I was my profession, I've been a bartender over thirty years. I kind of stopped bartending like before twenty eighteen, became a driver, and I was I had five driving positions, you know, DoorDash, Grubhub, Spark, Instacart, all of that before COVID. And then I was not going to renew my license this year. After all the years of renewing my license and then not finding a decent place to work or making good money or whatever.
And then because of what had happened, I was like, okay, I have no other choice. So I did find a position which is right here, real chill real chilly. And we do serve cans of beer. And the thing with the license is that because it's limited hours, it's only two people working, like, in the morning and then there's like a mid shift from three to nine which you have to be by yourself and the times that I did work by myself, I really thought I would, I applied for this in February. So, I've been back and forth wondering what's going on.
me being by myself if I have to be there, I have to have a license because we do serve cans of beer. It's not a bar. It's a restaurant. So they might, the times that I worked, it maybe one or two cans of beer. And I need work and this is messing with my work if I can't get the hours.
And since then she told me I can only have one day a week working with someone from like nine to three in the morning. Like today, I work ten to three and then go to the other one which does not serve alcohol to try to make up for the hours that I missed. Now as far as, yes, I have a court date coming up, but I need to work. I need to make money in the meantime. I don't know what else to say.
That's good. No, that's good, Ms. Peterson.
I've been under a lot with my mom because I have my mom has stage three and four breast cancer. She's like has dementia and then she has like bipolar just behavior issues and I've been dealing a lot with that because I'm her only daughter and I take care of her and give her her pills every day, twice a day, three times. Going back and forth between my house, her housework, my aunts, it just
This is good. No, thank you for sharing all of this. Happy to hear that you work at Real Chili. I'm a big fan of your product there and yes, I'm familiar that you guys sell cans of beer and yeah and so, you're needing this license so that you can continue to work there and hopefully pick up more hours. Any questions from committee members for miss Peterson? Alright. Is there a motion somebody would like to approve? Alderman Alex Brouwer moves to approve this this license. Any further discussion, any objection? Hearing none, so ordered. Alright. Very good. Congratulations.
I appreciate this. At least for the meantime until May because I don't know what's going to happen. So.
Very good. Luck to you. Maybe I'll see you over there. Yes. Well,
I'll be there till 02:00 today and
then I gotta go to the 1 West. Okay.
We'll be here.
We'll be here. Well, long long after this.
Next time. Next time. Great. Thank you. Good luck. Have a
good day.
Thank you. You too.
Alright. We will move on now to our 09:10AM agenda item. Carly Barent, Class C Operator's License Application. Is Carly Barent present? Alright, Carly Behrendt. Is this the first time non appearance? Yes. Alright, Alderman Jackson moves to hold this item to the call of the chair and hearing no objections so ordered. We'll move on to our 09:10AM agenda item. Is it DeAngelo Montreal Edwards, Class Operator's License Application? D'Angelo Montreal Edwards. All right. Is this the first time on appearance? Yes. Okay.
Alderman Jackson moves to hold item to the call of the chair and hearing no objection so ordered. We'll move on now to our next 09:10. 09:10AM agenda item. Gerald B Adams. Class B manager's license application.
Okay. I'm here.
Alright. Good morning.
Good morning.
Alright. If you'll raise your right hand, mister Adams, we'll get
you sworn in. Do you solemnly affirm on the events and penalties of perjury at the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is a true, the whole truth, and a film of the truth?
Yes.
Thank you. Thank you. Alright. Mister Adams, are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Yes, ma'am.
Okay. Thank you. And then will you please state your name and address for the record?
Gerald Adams. 2368 North 2nd. Thank
you. Alright. Sergeant Gonejo, is there a police report?
Yes. On 03/1824, the applicant was charged in Waukesha County with two counts of possession of amphetamine, misdemeanors, and possession of marijuana. He's found guilty. The charges were dismissed but read in. Found guilty on a possession of marijuana and paid a fine. Madam chair. Thank you.
Yes, attorney Gresham.
Can I get clarity as
far as which one was a misdemeanor or were they all read in as misdemeanors and then?
charge one was possession of amphetamine.
Those were
were the writing charges. And then possession of marijuana was a was a was a fine.
Okay. And is it I see it's listed as amphetamine LSD and psilocybin. Is that just a standard catch all effectively? Okay. Yes. Alright. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you. Mister Adams, would you like to speak to the police report?
Yes. You know, at the time, I was taking mushrooms and smoking weed. I got pulled over at Waukesha leaving work in Brookfield. It was a bogus police stop, but I went on and went through the process. I went on and took some AODA assessment just to kinda see where I was at as to why I was using a substance and things of that nature. Went through the assessment, went through some treatment, and, paid my fines.
Okay. The fines are all are paid in full?
Yes, ma'am. Okay.
I I also emailed the a copy case on the to the licensing.gov. But, I mean, it's it's in Wisconsin court access
Okay.
Right from Milwaukee. I can provide you guys the case number if you guys wanna look at that.
Okay. So you emailed us proof of payment of the fines?
Yes, ma'am.
Thank you. License division, can you confirm that?
I don't have access to
a license email right now, but there's nothing on record.
Okay. Alright.
I can share my screen from the court case. Are you guys able to see my screen?
No. No. We're There's nothing on
the police report stating outstanding fines.
So Oh, he indicated that he that it says that there's a fine. He said he paid it in full. I just asked if he paid it in full and he's indicated he sent license division proof of payment. Alright. I'm sure. Yes, Alderman Bergales.
So, the so we have a couple charges but the only guilty charge is marijuana. Okay. Move approval.
Alderman Peter Bergales moves approval. Any discussion on that motion? Any objection? Hearing none so ordered. Good luck to you, mister Adams.
Appreciate you guys. Thank you. See you soon, mister Jackson.
Alright. We will move on to our 09:15AM agenda item. Oddly k Jab Agent for, Smoker Zone LLC, Food Dealer License Renewal Application for Friendly Market at 2778 North 59th Street. Alright. Good morning.
Good morning.
If the two of you will raise your right hand, we'll get you sworn in.
The assembly of from an independent of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, whole truth, and a film of the truth?
Yes. Thank you. Thank you. Alright. Sir, are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied? Yes. Thank you. And can you please you have to speak
in Yes. The
Good. Thank you. And will you please state your name and address for the record?
My name is Adley Jabber. My address 2778 North 59 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53210.
Thank you.
You're
welcome. Alright. And then would you like to introduce yourself? Hi.
I'm Amanda Grise. I work for Aldo women's Charlotte Moore.
Wonderful. Thank you, Amanda. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds.
Okay. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
The following item is pertaining to licensee and business located at 2778 North 59th Street, 42425 at 07:45PM. Officers were dispatched to a theft complaint. The agent reported three juveniles who continue to steal merchandise from the business. Security camera footage was available for review on 06/2125 at 09:44AM. Also conducted tobacco compliance check. A participant under the legal age to possess a tobacco product was sold a cigar product by the listed agent without checking to an ID to verify their age. The agent was advised of the sale and cited for sale of cigarettes to a minor. Okay. It was in one status. However, it was paid on 04/21.
Thank you. Would the applicant like to speak to the police report?
I can speak. Can my son transfer for me?
Of course. Where is he?
In the
We need to get him We need to get him sworn in. Is it Omar? Yes. Omar is Alright. Good morning. If if you raise your right hand, Omar, we'd like to get you sworn in before we let you and then you can interpret. Do you solely affirm on
the defensive penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you.
Alright. And if you'll state your name and address for the record, Omar?
Omar Jabber. 6213 South 13th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53221. Thank
you. And you were going to help interpret for your dad today.
Yes? Correct. Yes. I'm in I'm my father's son, Adley, is my father, and I am his son, Omar.
Okay. And we just went through the police report, so wanted to give him a chance to to speak to the police report and if you could then interpret whatever whatever he says.
Yes. Absolutely.
So you Go ahead, sir. Do you wanna speak in your language and then your Yeah. Your son will
join in. Yeah.
So he does admit that he is at fault for selling to a minor. He usually does check for IDs. However, that day he was not feeling too well and completely just forgot to follow the protocol and process in place that he has set for his business.
Okay. Alright. Thank you.
Thank you.
Hold on. Questions on the police report from committee members? I'm sure. Alderman Bergalis?
What is your process and protocol to check for ID?
So the process and protocol, we implemented a new system into the business.
If gonna translate, then you have to translate for your father and then translate back.
Oh. Yeah. Let's let your dad respond and then you
So what is your so what is your process and protocol for your for checking IDs?
To me the particular ID.
Okay. The process that's implemented in place is that any tobacco sale or nicotine sale that occurs in the business, an ID is required to be scanned. If the customer does not have an ID, the sale is denied. No matter if an ID is needed to be able to be scanned into the system.
So the scan is the scanning system new or was it just not followed that day?
No. It's a new process that they implemented, a new system.
After the ticket? Yes.
Correct.
Okay. That gives me some encouragement. Thank you, madam chair.
Thank you. And then I'm sorry if I missed this because in the police report it says the citation for selling tobacco to a minor is in warrant status?
That's resolved.
Okay. That's been resolved?
It's been paid as
of '21. 04/21.
Okay. So the citation for selling tobacco to a minor was paid. Very good. Further questions from committee members on the police report? Alright. Questions from Elder Woman Moore's office on the report?
No questions.
Okay. Are there any neighbors present that wanted to testify to this item today?
No, madam chair.
Alright. Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. We are in the 10th Aldermanic District. Amanda from Alderman Moore's office.
Alderman Moore did go visit this business and is in full support of renewing the business license.
Very
good. Thank you. With that, we'll head into committee. Does the committee have a motion? Alderman Brower.
Move to approve.
Alderman Alderman Alex Bauer moves to approve.
Madam chair.
I'm sorry. Can you guys let me finish the motion and then we can take it to questions. Alderman Alex Bauer has moved for approval. I'm hearing some discussion. Alderman Jackson.
I'll let move approval with the warning letter.
On the motion.
We already have a motion on the table. Are you asking for I'm not sure. Not sure. Heard a motion.
Madam Chair.
Yes, Alderman By
I'll amend my motion to be approval with a warning letter.
Alderman Alex Bauer is revising his motion. He's moving for approval with a warning letter. Alright and with that.
A motion.
Alderman Bergelis has some discussion.
Thank you, madam chair. MPD has taken a conscious effort in the last nine months or so to ensure that rest year. Going And And be to
licensing reports. I am encouraged that this operator took the proactive step before committee to change their policies to tighten up their policies and make sure that every single purchase has an ID scan in their point of sale system. So I would to be consistent with our discipline in previous licensing meetings, I think it's wholly appropriate for renewal with warning letter for this first time offense, especially given that the applicant has taken a proactive measure to protect children in their neighborhood. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Alderman Bergalis. I do want to note Vice Chair Pratt is here with us virtually. Good morning to elder woman Pratt. With that we do have a motion on the table. The motion is approval with a warning letter. Any further discussion? Any objection? Hearing none so ordered. Good luck to you mister Jabbar. Thank you.
Thank you.
Alright. Yes. Thank you, Omar. We will move on to our 09:20AM agenda item. Robert Montemayor, agent for Monta Enterprises LLC Class A Malt and Class A Liquor and Food Dealer Licenses renewal application for Monterrey Market at 3014 South 13th Street. Alright. Good morning. Good morning.
Good to see you.
Good to see you as well.
And I see elder elder woman Dimitrevich is also with us virtually this morning. If the two of you would raise your right hand, we'll get
you sworn in. Do you solemnly from an independent of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is a true, the whole truth, and a film of the truth?
Yes.
Thank you. Thank you.
Yeah. He's not Mitrivich.
And alderwoman Mitrevich, you're muted.
Yes. I swear. Yes.
Okay. Very good. Thank you. Alright. Mister Montemayor, are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Yes. I am.
Thank you. And if you'll state your name and address for the record.
Robert Montemayor, 5770 Stephanie Way, Caledonia, Wisconsin 53108.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
Hold on. Okay.
No. No hold.
Alright. And sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
92525 at 10:13AM. Milwaukee police were dispatched to trouble the subject. The business call regarding a panhandler in front of the business. The subject left upon officer's request. 92825, once police conducted an alcohol compliance checks at approximately 12:16PM, a police say not a legal age to purchase alcohol, enter the business, and purchased an alcoholic beverage from the cashier who did check ID. The agent was cited for sale of alcohol to run their age and paid paid a fine after pleading guilty.
Thank you. Would you like to speak to the police report?
Absolutely. I mean, again, these are my my it's my grocery store and again, I take full responsibility for my staff and everybody that's that's part of that organization. But again, was it was an unfortunate situation. It's more of a language barrier. We did have a young lady that came in and they did and we do have those mechanisms in place to scan and she did scan but a little confused. I think it was in the rush of the moment but her supervisor actually nodded and said yes she is not of age and and the
hospital hospital officer police
officer was was was like, you're you're coming back with money or you're coming back with alcohol. And She came back in and she actually picked it up and left again. But subsequently, the cashier was fired just because that is just unacceptable for me. My supervisor for the location did get written up for that as well. There is no I just don't bend on that just due to the fact because we do have a I look at it as it's an alcohol or it's a license for to sell alcohol, but it's also a privilege where you're just like you just can't accept that and that's unacceptable for me.
So again, we went through the process, retrained all of our staff at all of our locations to say this is what is not acceptable just because she had it in her hand and because of the language barrier because she did not speak English and my cashier. But again, I am a representation of Monterey Market.
Thank you. Alright. Further questions on the police report from committee members? Alright. Questions from elder woman Dimitriovich on the police report.
Nothing on the police report.
All right. Are there any neighbors present that wish to testify to this item today. Okay let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. We are in the 14th District. Alderman Dimitriovich.
Good morning madam chairman and committee members. I had a very lengthy discussion with mister Montemayor and we discussed incident, how it happened, the protocols that are in place. I did express my major disappointment. It is very unlike his record of over sixteen years being a great provider provider of grocery in our community. We talk about how you know there must be a system in place to make sure it doesn't happen again. With that I let him know that I would be asking the committee to place a warning letter on file. Madam chair.
Alright. Thank you very much. Alderwoman. With that, we'll head into committee. Does the committee have a motion?
Madam chair.
Alderman Alex Brower.
Move to approve of the warning letter.
Alderman Alex Brower moves for approval with a warning letter. Any discussion on that motion? Any objection? Hearing none so ordered. Thank you, mister Montemayo. Good luck to you.
Thank you so much. Thank you. Alright.
We will move on to our 09:25AM agenda item. Kawar A Kalik, agent for KNA LLC filling station, food dealer, and whites weights and measures licenses renewal application for Petromart at 702 West Oklahoma Avenue. Alright. Good morning.
Good morning.
Good morning. Would you like to introduce yourself, counsel?
Sure. Attorney Mike Mazelman on behalf of mister Kalik.
Thank you. Alright. And then are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
We are.
Very good. And then mister Kalik, will you please state your name and address for the record?
Yes. Kavar.
Oh, I'm sorry. Can you raise your right hand so we can get you sworn in?
The is only a criminal and defensive penalties of burgeoning of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony we're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Yes. Thank you. Thank you. And then now will you state your name and address for the record?
Yep. Kovar, a colleague. 7611 Parkview Road, Greendale, Wisconsin 53129.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds.
Okay. Sergeant Sconejo, is there a police report?
On 04/1825 at 12:10AM, Milwaukee Police were dispatched to battery. The caller stated that they got into a verbal argument with the cashier and began to throw items across the aisles. The cashier the subject began to argue and throw items. The officer noted broken glass and bags of chips open and spilled across the floor. Further observation revealed the bag containing a green plant like substance behind the counter and a scale. The business did not have ways and and measures or extended hours license and should not have been open. At 08:22 twenty five at 10:10PM, Milwaukee Police conducted a license premise check. No violations were observed. On 09/01/2025 at 12:07AM, Milwaukee Police were dispatched to a weapon complaints. The business regarding a group of subjects in the parking lot, one of which they believed had a gun.
The subjects the subjects were no longer on scene. However, this was a a common occurrence with subjects loitering stating they are friends with the overnight clerk. On 11/1125 at 10:14PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to robbery. The caller say that they were attacked by four subjects, suspects. Keys were taken and their vehicle was stolen. The officers attempted to view video surveillance. However, they were told the employees were unable to access it. Follow-up was conducted on several days until finally on 11/1625. An officer was able to view footage which did capture part of the incident. The inability to view video surveillance hindered the officer's investigation.
On 11/1625 at 01:08AM, Milwaukee Police conducted license premise check. The business does not have a valid extended hours permit and were open for business. The agent was advised of the violation and agreed to close the business. The agent was advised that future violations could result in citations. On 01/2926 at 01:52AM, Milwaukee Police conducted a license service check regarding the extended hours license.
The officer found the business to be open and requested to see the license. However, the employee stated it was not at the business but had a photo on their phone. The employee was advised they must have the physical copy on premise. On 02/1026 at 10:16PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a property damage investigation, revealed a subject damage to a pump at the business. On 03/07/2026 at 2PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a shots fired. Investigation revealed that this was baseless. However, a property damage did occur while the victim was pumping gas and unknown suspect to hit the rear window with the board causing it to shatter. The business was cooperative with the investigation and allowed officers to view video surveillance of the incident.
Okay. Would the applicant like to speak to the police report?
Just briefly. You know, the last licensing cycle seems like an anomaly because the committee has in the last five years has renewed this, I believe, without a hearing. And so given the issues that we've had, we've sat down with all of our staff and went over all the procedures. Some of the things are not on the staff, it's on us. In the past we've had the weights and measures on extended hours license. I guess there was obviously a scoop on part. I'm not going to say it was on Fabi's part. It would have been on our part. We'll take responsibility for that but it happened. We do now have we've applied I believe we've applied for
that with this
in this application for that. Regarding the when we didn't have the our staff didn't have the access to the cameras, we've now given them all of the police excuse me, all of the passwords so they have access to that. In the past, my client was telling me we had some relationship with MPD where they were able to access the cameras. I asked him if it was fuses. He said it wasn't fuses.
I I don't know what went back maybe ten, fifteen years ago, but I've told him and he'd he'd also said that that that camera system that they had before with the police is not they're not using it anymore. So I suggest that we get FUSES. He's gonna be reaching out to the liaison officer to try to set that up as soon as possible. Our food dealer's license right now is from 12AM to 11:59PM. So I again, acknowledge and we acknowledge the issues that have popped up in the last cycle.
Again, it seems like an anomaly if you look on the first page of your e book. It will show you by the yellow highlighted bubble that it's been renewed for last five years without an issue.
Okay. Thank you. Thank you, council Maystellman. Questions on the police report from committee members? Alright. I do want to note, I don't think is there an is this also a new application for extended hours?
No, the extended hours was approved January of this year.
Okay.
The application was submitted ends of last year and was approved. They didn't hold an extended license, extended hours license, until or it was 2016 the last time they held it. And so the application that was submitted last year was a new one which was granted.
Okay. Which was granted. So what are the hours now?
Your hours are now or
At twenty four hours. Twenty four hours.
And do you note that on our on our application? Yeah. Alright. Questions from Alderman Dmitryovich on the police report?
Thank you, Madam Chair. There were some discrepancies as outlined both in the attorney and the police report on the extended hours. And that's an item when you're opening it up for discussion that I want to talk about. Could you just have one more time licensing explain kind of because they were cited a number of times on the police report for not having their extended hours license. Let me ask it like this. Is it accurate that the number of times they were cited in the police report for extended hours, they did not hold. They were operating without a license for extended hours. I just want to have that on the record.
I'm pulling up the police report so I can refer to it.
All Alderwoman may may I, madam chair?
Oh, go ahead, councilor I
believe that Alderwoman is is correct. I mean, we did not have the extended hours even though we were under the impression that we've had it because we've had it in the past, but good I
think
that's
in the file that would have required point. My that's client to come before the committee in the last five years. Nevertheless,
was wrong. He dropped the ball and he's, you know, he's he's acknowledging that.
And when did he?
If I may, the police report, madam chair, the majority of these issues apart from the major infraction of operating without a license for extend hours, the majority of of the the neighborhood issues have happened during that time period. So that is an issue that we'll need to discuss.
Alright. And when did they get approved for extended hours again license division?
January. It
was, yeah, granted in on January 20.
2026?
2026.
Yeah.
And the local alderman is correct. The majority of those incidences took place when technically we didn't have an a license to be open
at that
time. Okay.
And ma'am madam chair, not only during when they didn't have a license to be open during that time, but the time period of the night. Another way of saying it is the negative things are happening post midnight.
Oh, the
I wanna be very clear about that. The police report suggests that none of these things aren't happening at 5PM. There you just heard it. It was like 12AM, 1AM, etcetera.
You you Alderman, get I I'm sorry. I wasn't clear. Yes. I acknowledge that. I, all those majority of them took place during the extended hours when they should not have been open.
Okay. But now the extended hours application was approved January of this year and it is a twenty four hour business. Are there any neighbors present that wish to testify in this item today? Okay. Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. We are in the 14th Aldermanic District. Alderman Dimitrivich.
Okay. Thank you. I guess this is kind of a unique one And there I I wanna admit there was some miscommunication in between a little bit of licensing, also, know, we always check with our police department and community liaison officers when there's a number of phone calls like this because it as you know, all of those visits take time and money and resources from our neighborhood. I'm very disappointed. Let's take away the fact that there seem to be that miscommunication on the actual license to operate during those hours madam chair what I'd like to direct the committee's attention to is the activities that are happening in a pattern around that time.
In addition, have younger folks and some connections. You know, it seems like that we're kind of hanging out according to the police report. So I wonder if the operator has considered, you know, possibly changing those hours of service. Has that has that been considered by the operator and their representation?
No, I don't believe it has at this point. Do you want to speak?
I did change the cashier so I don't have the one cashier no longer who had like friends come over and hang out. So and we put up, you know, signs like no loitering so we can call the police and then have them sitated if somebody is hanging out. And then we have a lot of, like, homeless population in the area, like, along the railway property on 6th Street, you know. There's a lot of issues with those people to come to. There's, like, three businesses in this intersection, like four businesses actually, pharmacies like Walgreen, people McDonald's, and the gas station then, you know, so there's a lot of, like, people coming.
They're just loitering and then panhandling, you know. And we have to keep going back and forth with them all day.
And if I may, older woman, again, it it seems like an anomaly. Alright? I mean, not to make an excuse, but the last five years, there weren't any incidences on the police report even though they were opened at at at extended hours. That being said, I'm not trying to negate what happened in the last year. We are taking proactive measures to ensure that those issues don't happen again. And we continue to be conducting ourselves where, like we did in the last five years, there aren't any more issues.
All right. Okay. May I, madam chair? Yes, of course. Yeah.
I mean, allowing the pumps to be open twenty four hours seems reasonable. I'm just trying to ask you what part of your business plan and business model needs to have the actual store open past midnight. And have you can while you're talking there, have you considered
So we
have a lot of
working Let her let her finish.
Yeah. These incidents are very recent as well, madam chair. Sorry. I I took a pause there. Sorry about that.
Go ahead.
Like, we have a lot of people going to work at the factories, you know, working class people. They start their shift at 4AM, 5AM. So, like, you know, we need to be ready and then the workers like, you know, after midnight, they do cleaning and stuff like that, you know? A lot of people are doing third shift, our customers. So they are, you know, coming around, you know, midnight and then, you know, a lot of them start early around like four 4AM that go to first year.
I mean, did you talk to the elder woman before you decided to go twenty four hours or is this why is this a new conversation we're
having?
Well, it was approved.
Yeah. Right. In January. But did you talk to the other woman?
I when I applied for it, I called the office and then I talked with the the attendant, you know, and then she said they have no problems. Okay. Yeah. Alright. So that's what I do. Okay.
You. Thank you. Yeah.
As I stated previously, yes, our office was in communication, myself and Terry. We had there there was a little bit of a miscommunication, a misunderstanding clearly. They thought they had a license, but they didn't. I'm not sure if licensing sent it. I don't I don't know that we truly have to relitigate that. Unfortunately, they were operating for quite some time without the extended hours. Then they got it, and then many issues started happening very fairly recently if you look at the timing of the police report. So I I still think it's unfortunate that they were operating without it. We allowed it because we kind of thought they had it. Regardless, let's set that aside for a moment.
There are these I'm applicant has considered sorry. Sorry. Perhaps since you didn't have the license for a while for extended hours. Is there any consideration on your part that you are considering changing any of your hours for this the store, not the pumps, the store.
No, older woman. We we don't want to do that. I do notice of the nine incidences, four of them took place after after the hours. And then again, we're we we, you know, we get put in a situation where do we call the police? Right? Because then it's the p a 33 is generated and then, you know, the the y'all can come back to us and say, well, you know, we're wasting resources.
Well, you're not please don't. Attorney May Suman, you know full well that the committee takes everything to account. Do not we never want you to not reach out to police.
Right. And that's what we have. And that's why I always tell all my clients to do that.
And then since we got the license, we only had one after hours where the police came to check the license.
Okay.
You know?
Did you attempt to talk to the alderwoman before committee today? Have you talked to the alderwoman before committee today about this?
No. Okay. I would think
that everybody here is remiss for not convening beforehand because now we're having a long discussion in committee.
Well, it's about the extended hours and that conversation took place and it was passed, right? I mean, so that the issue isn't anything else. It's the extended hours which was approved a few months ago and my client said as the Alderman concurred, they were in discussions. So, I didn't think that this was the extended hours is what we've been talking about the whole time would be an issue because it was approved a few months ago and it was communication.
Alright. So, it's I'm hearing the alderman ask, are you willing to change your hours? No. And you are saying no.
Right.
You want to continue to operate twenty four hours
a day?
We have for for many, many, many, many years and we're serving we're serving, you know, folks that are working, you know, the third shift. That's why we're open. If we weren't making money, then we wouldn't be open.
Alright. And for the edification of the public, if the applicant does not want to amend their application, they they are within their rights to decline. With that, Elderwoman Demetraevich.
Okay. Sorry, I unmuted there. Was when did licensing I'm just gonna ask one last thing, then I'll wrap it up. When was like, when did license mail them the extended hours license?
It would've been mailed out that same day on the common council date of 01/20.
Okay.
Well, guess I'm interested in holding the items open for extended hours.
It's not
good for consideration in January.
I'm I'm really confused. I don't know if license division needs to weigh in here. The extended hours application is not before us. It was passed in January. Was it scheduled or what's the problem? Was the alderman not notified appropriately or can I get some context?
What do you mean the alderman was?
The alderman's asking about whole about the extended hours application but we held it. We heard it in January, correct? And it was passed. Nothing for us. Right? So, does somebody wanna give me context? I don't know if Alderman Dimitrevich or licensed division. Sure. Why is there some miscommunication here? I do just wanna add that the three checks that
were conducted in that period were they didn't have the extended laws. There wasn't citations issued either. So I I think the elder woman has said that citations were issued. Citations were never issued for any of those violations either.
So just to put that out there. Okay. And and why would citation of citations not have been issued?
Depends on the officers that want to go investigate the. Okay.
They just have the license a week before.
Alright. But you're right. We're not here on that.
We're
I'm sorry. I'm I'm trying to get some clarification on the confusion around the extended hours application is not before us. It was approved in January. Right. Alderman Dimitrevich, do you would you like to weigh in here? I'm struggling getting context about why there's some confusion.
Well, I apologize. I'm sorry for the committee's time, but you could see why we've been analyzing this for a while trying to get answers. It's odd to me that the police would go three times during those hours for disturbances or a license check. They didn't have a license for extended hours and then they were cited. So it's it's hard for me to understand. And at the end of
day, I think there is an issue with their service past midnight.
And this should have happened last week.
Wait, attorney miss Smith.
Right.
But then in January, the application for extended hours was passed. Correct, alderwoman? Right.
And when was the last item on the police report? If we could get that from the police? When the date and the last item on the police report? Excuse me.
So the extended licenses was before the committee in January. He had three additional items after the extended licenses were issued. There one of them was a license premise report. Our license premise check by the district. So it wasn't a call for service. It was just officers doing a proactive check. There was the 02/1026 at 10:16PM property damage and then there was additional call on 3726 at 2PM for shots fired incident. So the two additional items on the police report were not during the extended hours license period.
And that's what I was gonna point out.
Okay. And I just wanna be clear. That was 2PM in the afternoon, that last item? Yes, ma'am. Okay. All right. With that, I think we're we've kind of exhausted discussion. Alderman Dimitravich, do you want to make any final comments and then we should probably let the applicant speak as well before we head into committee?
Yes. Final comment. I don't understand why when they didn't have the extended hour license before January, three times they were visited without a license and they were not cited. It is hard for me to understand that and I think there's issues post midnight. It looks like there was a licensing like perhaps they weren't given the citation because there was a licensing miscommunication. I can't infer that prior to January. We were trying to help us along in January. Then there were more issues. So at the time of their license renewal now, I'm bringing up those issues. I don't think that positive things are happening at the time after midnight.
Also they do need a warning letter for those number of negative incidences that have happened.
Thank you.
Thank you, Aldo Woman. I wanted to give attorney Mason a chance to make brief closing comments before we head into committee.
Just briefly. I was not prepared today to talk about the extended license application because I know it had just been approved, right? And if if it if there were issues at that time, then they should have been discussed at at that time. Right? I mean, and so I'm not sure why we're doing it right now. If it if if you all passed it, I we would concur. We we'd be happy to take a warning letter and we will continue to work with the police. I think part of it is we have a good working relationship with the police. And as as sergeant noted, since we've had the extended hours, we haven't had any issues in extended hours. I mean, the police showed up at 01:52 asking where our license was.
Right? We showed them a picture of it. It was issued by the police by the city, but there weren't any real problems that took place after hours. So with all that, we would request that we have our and we're not here for the license extended but for our Philly station and food dealers in which in measurements license renewed.
All right. I know Alderman Bergalis has a question. Go ahead, Alderman Bergalis.
No question. More of a statement for context. The South Side had a number of gas stations that were operating in extended hours without the without the appropriate permits and that was enforced regularly from the district. That has since changed. And we have seen a number of these South Side extended hours.
I can count four in my district that we've processed in recent months. This I believe is a similar situation where it was a long time operator and for whatever reason, the license was never applied for, granted, or contested or cited. So, there were problems. I don't don't think you know, we've exhausted the discussion about extended hours. But for context on the South Side, there were a number of places that just weren't paying the or obtaining the appropriate license for those time periods.
I see two items on the police report, property damage and a shattered window after that extended hours license was granted. There are a number of items on the police report. So, I'm encouraged by the trend and I'm I'm glad that the applicant has the appropriate licenses now like all good operators should in the city of Milwaukee. They'll move for renewal with a warning letter.
Alright. Alderman Peter Bergalis moves for renewal with a warning letter. Is there any further discussion on the motion?
And madam chair for context that is consistent with what we've done with the other operators that have recently found the light and obtained the proper necessary extended hours license. Thank you.
All right.
You. Point of information, Madam Chair, just one question for the future.
Do that.
To to
license. Discussion from committee? Any objection? Hearing none, so ordered.
Thank you very much.
Good luck to you. I would advise you to stay in contact with your elder person.
Yes. Thank
you. We'll move on to our nine: 3zero am agenda item. Corey R. Kerrigan, agent for RC Automotive LLC, Class B Tavern Public Entertainment Premises and Food Dealer Licenses Application requesting instrumental musicians, disc jockey, hookah services, bands, karaoke, patrons dancing, one pool table for RC Towing and Repair featuring the Garage Dance Studio at 7419 West Bradley Road. Is Corey R. Kerrigan present?
I'm here.
Alright. And I see elder woman Taylor is also here with us virtually. Good morning.
Good morning. Yes, I'm here.
Alright. If you'll both raise your right hand, we'll get you sworn in.
Do you signify from an independent plaintiff's suppurator of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and affirmative truth?
I do. I do. Thank you.
Alright. And, elder woman, do we I just wanted to make sure we we heard you as well.
I do. Yes.
Thank you. Alright. Alright, mister Kerrigan, are you on receipt of notice today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Thank you. And if you'll please state your name and address for the record.
My name is Corey Kerrigan senior. Address is 4450 North 57th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Thank you. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
Holds for occupancy and holds for inspection.
Alright. Sergeant Kovnejo, is there a police report?
There are no police reports.
Alright. I see it's a new application. Mister Kerrigan, will you tell us about your experience and plan for the business?
Yes. My experience for basically a jazz club. It's kinda it's kinda new, the part of the experience, but what I wanna do is offer live music and food for patrons to come in and, you know, enjoy themselves. You know, a nice nice, clean, safe environment.
Alright. And you've had experience running a similar business? Can you
What I what I ran was pretty much just like a hall wrinkle sort of business. That's what I've done in the past. Okay.
Thank you. Questions for the applicant from committee members at this time? Questions from Alderman Taylor for the applicant?
No questions.
Okay. Are there any neighbors present that we should testify on this item today? Thank you. Alright, let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. We are in the 9th Aldermanic District. Alderwoman Taylor?
The 9th District is in support of mister Carrington and his business.
Okay. Thank you. Alright.
Madam Chair.
Alderman Alex Bauer.
I'm just curious because I noticed here on the our agenda here, is the same applicant applying for a separate license in our next agenda item at almost next store. Can I maybe I'm just going to can we get some information about that? Is that going to be I mean, the addresses that we have 7419 West Bradley, 7427, those might be Ah. I I just want I just want to maybe get that cleared up what the if that those
It's a strip mall. I just pulled it up.
Madam Chair? Okay.
Attorney Gresham.
Before we discuss it, we should call it.
Okay.
So if we want to, we could resolve this one as a separate entity or alternatively, we call a second one and then deal with them collectively. But again, those would be an independent motions and would have to be handled as separate hearings But to discuss them kind of collectively, we should call them so that it's properly noticed.
Okay. If I can can I hold this one to the call of the chair? Don't want to resolve it without think Alderman Bauer brings up
I a think it's a great point. I think we should call it, again, just for a public notice purpose and for agenda purposes. So it'd be called and then again we will be resolving them as kind of a group and then again voting them both, reopening the first, voting that one and then voting the second one as well. For neighbor purposes, you may want to call neighbors on the first and then kind of move into the second. But as far as discussion regarding the second, I think it's best that we call before we discuss.
Okay.
Just for, I mean, clarity of purpose here.
Yes. And we did ask for neighbors on this item. There are no neighbors present.
Hold and then call just for clarity. He's already been sworn as has the alder.
Very good. So Alderman Alex Brower moves to hold this item to the call of the chair and hearing no objections so ordered, we're going to move on to the 09:35AM agenda item. Corey R. Kerrigan, agent for Cove LLC, Class B Tavern Public Entertainment Premises and Food Dealer Licenses application requesting instrumental musicians, disc jockey, hookah services, bands, patron contests, patrons dancing, and one pool table for Cove at 7427 West Bradley Road. Very good. And Mr. Kerrigan is on the board. He's been sworn in. Do I have to ask him if he's in receipt of this one as well? Yes.
Okay. And on this application, Mr. Kerrigan, are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Alright. Thank you. He's already identified himself.
Yeah and we can move right into the clarifying question from Alder Brower.
Very good. Alright. If you could answer Alderman Alex Brower's question, mister Kerrigan, we're seeing two applications that look very near each other.
Yes. So that it is two different licensing that I have did apply for. One is RCI Automotive feature in the garage dance studio. There, it's a dance studio. Okay. I'm a dancer. I think I do Chicago style. Step in is kinda like a almost like a formal dance, almost like ballrooming. I've been doing that since about here about 2000 since 2016, and I kinda support the Milwaukee Step community. It's kinda like I'm like the the pillar of the community for them.
So it's not a lot of places where they can go, where they, you know, can actually dance to it's kinda like, you know, old school musical or just nice music. You know, it's it's a more of a older crowd. I almost would say 45, 50, and up. I'm kinda like the youngest guy, and I'm kinda giving these senior citizens and peep you know, them type of people to come out and dance and get exercise.
Mhmm.
So the problem was we couldn't sell alcohol or food, so that's why I kinda wanted to get my alcohol, my liquor license, and my food business license so then I can also provide for them, you know, wine and beer, liquor, food, you know, while they dance and, you know, things of that, you know, of that nature.
Mr. Kerrigan I'm looking for some but weren't everything you just said are you weren't you talking about the previous application for the dance studio?
Yeah that's the dance studio so the cove would be a jazz it'd be more like a jazz lounge.
We're discussing cove right now. So yes, I want you to tell us.
Oh, okay. I'm sorry. So yes, The Cove, yes, it's a different, it's a separate location. It's the same location but right next door. And I want to offer, you know, jazz and food here.
Okay. Madam chair.
Attorney Gresham.
Well, MPD does have a police report for this location. That was noticed. So, I believe they're going to read it in. I believe it may actually apply to one or both locations or the individual applicant, but it was properly noticed for this specific location. So we should read it in, again, as it applies to the current hearing and the current location that we are contending with.
Okay. So I'll just start with are there any holds, Ms.
Hold for inspection, holds for occupancy for the application of Cove.
Okay. Thank you. Sergeant Covenant, was there a police report?
Okay. On 09/1819 at 10:57AM, Milwaukee Police conducted a licensed premise check at 7419 West Bradley Road. The officer noted two tow trucks were not on file with the city license and missing the company name. The officer went over city ordinance with the agents. On one twenty eight twenty one at 04:02PM, Monkey Milwaukee Police were dispatched to a tamer violation at 7419 West Bradley Road. On arrival, officers observed approximately 20 subjects who the agent stated were there for a funeral wake. The agent stated that the host dance classes periodically and sell chips and soda, however, did not sell liquor. Officers observed a cash register at that was not turned on and liquor bottles in the office. The officer advised the agent that they cannot sell liquor nor host events without a permit. The agent was cooperative.
So Madam Chair, again, were noticed for this location but apply to the previously read location which
should
be known to the agent as they are both, again, under his name. We could read them back in on seventy fournineteen if that's the prerogative of the committee. I think it would be good and likely material to discussion of both. But again, they were noticed for this location but are relevant to the previous location. So again, we may have to read them again just for clarity sake, but we're reading them now because they were properly noticed here.
And we can contend with them here or we can go back and contend with them in the previous location. But again, we can treat these kind collectively in a certain respect because they are next door under the same agent for similar purposes. But again, we have to kind of procedurally contend with either separately. I know that sounds a little bit technical, but it's the way that should be done.
Well, additionally though, these are from a few years ago. This is a new application. This, the applicant, this is, wouldn't it be under a previous premise report? Chair, I, the way just looking at
the license premise reports, the there was no licenses there for this type of license previously, but the applicant was the one that was on scene for both of those incidents.
Also, he was running prior? Yes, ma'am. Businesses? Okay. Would you like to speak to the police report, mister Kerrigan?
Yes, I would. Thank you. For the let's see here. Hold on. For that first police report on 09/1819 where MPD was conducting license check, and there were tow trucks.
I think it was, like, two of them that was out there that was just purchased waiting to get registered and everything was sitting out on the line. He told me that they pretty much I had to register him and get my logo on the side of him. And then on the second one, one of my family members passed, and we had a a wait not a wait, but what do they call it? A repass. That's what it was.
The repass. And and it was during the day, probably maybe, I don't know, three, 04:00 in the evening, and police came in and said that we were selling alcohol, there's somebody who was selling alcohol, and I let it they came in, they looked behind the bar with no alcohol back there. I personally had my personal alcohol in my office, and that's where they seen, you know, the bottles. And they did let me know that I couldn't host events and that I cannot sell alcohol. And I I told them, well, you know, I I won't do it and that was that.
Okay. Questions on the police report for the applicant at this time? Sir, you weren't cited for for this violation?
No, ma'am.
Okay. But you immediately stopped selling liquor because you were made aware
of I your wasn't I'm sorry. Not to cut you off. I wasn't selling liquor. I had it for my personal use. It was a family repast. It wasn't like it was a total stranger. Was it was for a family.
Mhmm. But
you still need yes. You are you're now you understand you need to apply, and that's why you're before us today.
Oh, yes.
Okay. Alderman Taylor, do you have questions on the police report?
No. I don't have any questions on this police report.
Okay. And are there any neighbors present to testify on this item for Cove LLC? Okay. Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. Alderman Brower, did you have any? I know you were the one who pointed
No, no. I just wanted to get clear on, it looks like it's going be two separate businesses with and I did look at the files. There'll be potentially different operations, hours and well, some of the hours will overlap, but I just wanted to be clear about the two businesses there. It looks like they'll be the same owner, same agent operating both businesses next to each other. I think my questions have been answered about that.
Okay. Very good. And they're right next door to each other, mister Kerrigan?
Yes, ma'am.
So, you feel you'll be able to be on-site for both of them and keep an eye on both of them simultaneously?
Yes, ma'am.
Alright. We are in the 9th Aldermanic District, elder woman Taylor on Cove.
Yeah. So I just asked the only thing that I have is is to see what Mr Carrington would think is a realistic time for opening, because he has on his application 8AM, but, he has indicated he's not a breakfast spot, for an 8AM open. So I didn't know what his realistic time for opening, what time he think he's really going to open. And I like for him to adjust his hours accordingly. So what time do you think you'll open realistically?
discussed that probably about a couple months ago. I did go. You advised me to go back down to licensing to adjust that. So, it would have been 05:00, five to twelve. Okay. 5PM to 12AM.
Alright. I see license division wanted to chime in here. Miss miss Lopez.
Thank you, madam chair. Yes. The application for both Cove and RC Towing, the hours were amended. Both have the hours of operation of 5PM until midnight. Cove does have the age restriction of 30 and up. That age restriction does not apply to the RC application. Okay.
Okay.
Is there can I ask if there's a reason why we didn't put 30 and up on the RC application, mister Carrington?
Yes, ma'am. The reason being because the RC the the RC Automotive featuring the garage dance studio, we we are specializing in dance. So in order for the Chicago style stepping to grow, we have to have younger adults to come in and dance, and that kind of extend the life of the dance here in the Milwaukee area. I started when I was probably, I don't know, 36 or 47. And, you know, we look for younger dancers because a lot of them a lot of the older ones, they are passing away.
So we the younger we get it, get patrons to come in and kinda walk them through our our dance, you know, they stay longer, and they also they kinda preserve the dance, should I say. And, also, they you know, it's like a cycle. You know, they teach new dancers to come up. And the music that we listen to and that we cater to is is is not like music that make you wanna do violent things or nothing. So and the way the dressing is, you know, the the the people just not gonna come out to listen to, you know, the old days and and wanna do Biden thing.
It's just not gonna happen here. You know, I'd like to tap in having this dance studio since 2016, and we never had no problems. Audra Taylor, she stopped in. She kinda seen how respectful, helpful everybody was, how security. We walked her out to her car and made sure she got you know, make sure you know, because it's kind of a dark parking lot. So we do walk like the women out. The men, we walk them, you know, if they need help, older guys. And we just never had an incident. Never. Not one time. No shooting. No fighting. Not even arguing. And that and I I travel all over The United States, step in.
Okay. And
Please wrap it up, miss care mister Carrigan. Please wrap it up. I wanna hear from alderwoman Taylor.
Okay. So I'm I'm good. He we do need to make an adjustment because on the RC application, it does say zero to 80 as much as I would love to have a dance place for our young people. I don't think we can do zero to 80. Is that something that has to be changed on the application and I can direct that question to the city attorney or to licensing?
Madam chair.
Go ahead.
So these kind of restrictions are kind of business bit
we're do do
We're
because, again, we're dealing with the Cove right now. But as we discuss RC and the Cove collectively, to mirror the Cove's limited or restrictive thing, it doesn't seem like the applicant is amenable to that. But again, those are discussions that could have happened prior. I mean, they can happen now, obviously, but it seems as though the applicant just stated in a kind of longer response that he wants to facilitate this as more of a dance studio that allows for the kind of percolation of this dance throughout the community of all ages. So again, a discussion with the applicant would have to take place regarding any limitation that he's going to include on that license.
If instead, he's not amendable and this committee sees fit to hold or deny based on that or based on a recommendation, Again, he could reapply with more changes to his business application that are seen to comply or at least be helpful in the committee's deliberation and decision ultimately. But right now, the the Cove is what's in front of us, and I think that the committee should likely resolve itself to, discussing the Cove, as it has its own restrictions and seems to be in support. I would advise that that be resolved and then we bring a discussion into RC Automotive once that's called back. Again, the reason the COVE was brought in was because of a question about the collective nature of these two or these two licenses or applications rather. As we discussed the Cove and kind of move to resolve on that, we should again strive, I guess, to limit discussion on RC Automotive because what we don't want to do is be seen to decide on both with regard to one's restrictions or because of one, I guess, difference as it were.
So if we can kind of resolve the cove and then move back into RC Automotive and discuss its specificity or the specifics. That would probably be the best.
Okay. Okay. Thank you. Oh, I'm sorry.
Go ahead.
Okay. So, Alderman Taylor, well, let's vote on Cove and then we'll go back to the one that I know you have some concerns on.
Okay.
But I know you were good with Cove. They had the thirty years and up with hours five to midnight. Yes. Alright. Move forward. Alderman Deandre Jackson moves for approval of Cove LLC, the 09:35AM agenda item. Any discussion on that motion? Any objection? Hearing none, so ordered. Alright.
So that passes. Cove passes committee, mister Kerrigan but now we'll Alderman Jackson moves to reconsider our nine: 3zero am agenda item on RC Automotive LLC located at 7419 West Bradley Road. Okay? There are some concerns by the alder I'm hearing although we see that were amended five to midnight.
Yep. So let me. Oh, I'm sorry. Go ahead with that part.
Nope. That's it. And I know you were looking for a greater age restriction but sounds like Go ahead.
Actually, it was really a question. It wasn't really.
Okay. Go ahead.
Yeah, I do. I think that, like Mr Carrington said, I did stop in. They were very respectful. He hasn't had any trouble. So it was really just a question that I was just asking that if he could do that, and if the attorney is saying that it's a dance studio and that he can indeed have zero to 80 to a to be able to service a wider community.
I'm okay with that. Okay. Under under mister Carrington's charge. I do want to make sure that we have the hours straight though because I'm you you you actually amended to.
Yes, he did amend the application. Miss Lopez, you want to repeat it for the elder woman?
Yep. The hours were amended to be 5PM to midnight every
other Okay.
Very clear, mister Carrington, because you are attempting to service zero to 80 with the age restriction on your on your application. Are you absolutely sure that for this RC, for this site, for this address, that 5PM till midnight is going to suffice for servicing the younger crowd?
Yes. But I'm I'm only really, so dealing with occupancy, I'm only going to be allowed to go from zero to 50.
Okay, zero to 50. Okay.
Okay, no,
that's no, no, no. There's some confusion here. Yeah. Go ahead, Ms. Lopez. I was
just going to say, I believe Mr. Kerrigan means occupancy. If DNS and on his occupancy permit states zero to 50, that's the people that can be in the building. That is not a restriction on the age of the people. Oh.
Yeah. So it'll be
I'm sorry. It'll be 21 and up on on the RC automotive side.
Okay. Alright. So so you're not you're not perceiving that you would have clients or or customers that would be 21.
That's not true.
Okay. Alright. Someone else is turning in.
Yes. Hold on. One second, elder woman. Who who just asked to speak?
That was that was.
Okay. I'm sorry. Alderman Brower has something.
We we should make an amendment then to include the 21 age restriction, and I'd make that amendment. Is that is that correct? I I think we wanna do that. Yeah.
Okay.
Is that did you want to make that amendment, mister Kerrigan? I thought he was serving Yeah. It's a dance studio and you were serving a broad array of ages.
No. No. I'm I I apologize. It was 21 and up.
Okay.
It's 21. Yeah. Not nothing under no nobody under 21. Okay.
I don't I'm not sure where somebody got the zero to eighty.
Because that's what's on the application right now. It says zero to eighty.
Ma'am, check
it 6AM to 1PM on the application. Yeah. So, I just wanted to have clarification of what we really wanted on there. I'm okay with the amendments that have been made of the time and the age of 21 and up for mister Carrington and and our district is happy to to support them.
So, we should do a 21.
Okay. Amendment from Florida.
Alright. So, per mister Kerrigan, Alderman Alex Bauer has moved to amend the application to reflect age age restriction of 21 and up and hearing no objection to that motion so ordered. With that, I think we're ready for motion.
Madam chair.
Go ahead. Move approval. As amended.
Alderman Alex Frauer has moved for approval as amended and hearing no objection so ordered. Alright. Thank you. Good luck, mister Kerrigan.
Thank you, guys. Have a great day.
Alright. We'll move on to our 09:40AM agenda item. Our pen is out. Millard Millard Ellis, agent for RB Resolution Properties LLC. 11600 West Park Place Series. Class B Tavern Hotel Motel, food dealer, and licenses Application for Hilton Garden Inn, Milwaukee, NW at 11600 West Park Place. Good afternoon or good morning, sir. Good morning. Alright. Mister Ellis, will you raise your right hand and we'll get you sworn in?
The use only from under the defense of verdict of the state of Wisconsin that the test you are about to give is a true, whole truth, and a form of the truth? Yes. Thank you, sir.
Thank you. Alright. And are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied.
Yes I am.
Okay and will you state your name and address for the record.
My name is Millard Ellis. I live at 3879 South Of Miami Street in Milwaukee.
Hold up. Oh I'm sorry.
Will you know will you pull the microphone closer to you?
I'm sorry.
Thank
you. Okay. My name is Millard Ellis. I live at 3879 South Miner Street, Apartment 4, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
Holds for occupancy.
Okay. Sergeant Conejo, is there a police report?
On 05/01/2017, the applicant was charged with two counts of theft, business setting in Rock County Circuit Court. On 07/1918, the applicant was convicted and fined.
Okay. Would you like to speak to the police report?
Yes. I can. It was a property I was at, they charged me and my staff with account receivables or the account receivables that wasn't going to the clients. It was no wrongdoing. I fought it for as long as I could. Then financially, I just had to make a deal, to be honest with you.
Okay. Alright. Questions on the police report for the applicant from committee members? Questions on the police report from Alderman Taylor for the applicant?
No. No questions.
Okay. Alright. Are there any neighbors present that wish to testify on this item? Okay. Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. Oh, I do see it's a new application. Do you want to tell us a little bit about your plan and your experience?
Yes. The hotel has been there for twenty five years. I've been at the property for a little over a year. It's a new ownership group. So we're pretty much a 184 room property servicing any guest that comes in the area teams.
Let me see where we have I have about 85 employees, restaurant, meeting space, and we've done pretty well since I've been there for the past year. And I think, you know, I'm hoping to continue that. And I guess my experience, I've I mean, over fifteen years of experience for myself for doing the particular hospitality.
Thank you. Alright. Well, with that, if if there's no questions from committee members at this time, we are in the 9th Aldermanic District. Alderman Taylor?
Like he said, he's been there for quite some time. He's been very cooperative and working with me on security. So I think the 9th District would be happy to support his application at
this time.
Okay. Thank you. We'll go
back in
the committee. Any motion from committee?
Move then, chair.
Alderman Peter Bergelis moves for approval. Any objection? Any discussion? Hearing none so ordered. Good luck, mister Ellis.
Thank you.
Thank
you. Okay. We'll move on to our 09:50AM agenda item. Anna R Perez, agent for Mi Familia's Kitchen LLC, food dealer and food peddler license renewal application for Mi Familia's Kitchen LLC at 626 South 5th Street. Is Anna R Perez present?
She's on the Alright.
Okay.
Good morning.
Good morning.
Alderman Perez and Anna is here virtually. If you'll both raise your right hand, we'll get you
sworn in. This is Holly from an defense and penalties of burgeoning of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony we're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Thank you. Anna, we didn't hear anything. Miss Perez? Okay, we're not hearing anything from Anna Perez. Not sure if you need to fix your settings. Or go go in and come out. Miss Perez?
Move for temporary hold. Miss Perez, please check your settings on the top of your computer. You'll see a little digit there. Get that, go to your audio and check your microphone setting because right now it shows you're unmuted but we cannot hear you.
All right. Alderman Jackson's gonna move this move to hold this item to the call of the chair and hearing no objections so ordered just to give Anna time to fix her settings and we'll move on to the next item in District 12. We'll move on to our nine: 5five am agenda item. Just let us know as soon as you get that fixed, miss Perez. Alright, on our nine: 5five am agenda item, Luis Miguel Complido, agent for L, is it Mananero? LLC, food dealer and food food peddler licenses application for El Mananero at 1601 West Lincoln Avenue. Good morning.
Oh. What is it? And I. I like the hoodie.
Oh, thank you.
And looks like Carmen Roman is gonna help with interpretation. Thank you. Alright. Mister Miguel Complido, will you raise your right hand and we'll get you sworn in as well as Carmen?
The use only on the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin? Who
cut the wrong hand up?
Doesn't matter.
Oh, You're right.
It doesn't matter.
Do you solely affirm on the depends and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin? That the testimony you're to give that I'm sorry. That the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the
truth? Wisconsin. Yes.
Thank you. Mhmm. And Carmen. Zvi. Yes. Thank you. And Luis, are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied?
Thank you. And if you'll please state your name and address for the record.
Okay. 2002 Thousand 700. South 48th Street.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Okay. 53218.
And your name, you need to say your name.
Luis Miguel Complredo.
Thank you. And then Carmen, will
you introduce yourself to Carmen Roman, staff assistant, 2280 West Mangold Avenue.
Thank you. Alright. Very good. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
Hold for inspection.
Okay. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
Sergeant Cornejo will read the report. I just wanted to know for the committee, when we noticed this one, we listed the applicant as a shareholder, but he's the actual applicant. So you will hear sergeant Cornell will refer to him as the applicant versus shareholder that's listed in your file. It is the same person. We just noticed it incorrectly. Okay.
And your police report, it appears.
The following items pertains to 1601 West Lincoln Avenue. On 01/31/2017, the applicant was charged in Milwaukee County Court and found guilty of OWI first. Not just forfeiture. Alright.
That's it?
Oh, no. There's one just waiting for translate. Okay.
Oh, I'm sorry. Yes.
OWI. Okay. Is that the first one done?
On 04/24/2017, the applicant was charged in Milwaukee County Court and found guilty of OWI second, sentenced to a forfeiture, lock, interlock, one year, ten days, a doll's correction, and driver's license revoked one year. '19, the applicant was charged in Milwaukee County Court and found guilty of OWI third, sentenced ninety days at the house of correction, ignition interlock two years, and driver's license revoked for two years. On 03/1423, the applicant was charged in Milwaukee County Court and found guilty of OWI fourth, sentenced to a hundred and eighty days at the house correction, ignition interlock, two years, and driver's license revoked for three years. On 05/05/2023, the applicant was charged in Milwaukee court. Milwaukee County Court and found guilty of OWI fifth, sentenced to two years in state prison, and three years extended supervision.
On 02/2726, an email was sent to the Department of Correction requesting the probation or parole status of the agents be sent to license division with any objections to a license.
Okay.
Would you like to speak to this police report?
He acknowledged that he made mistakes. He was very depressed, and he's trying to change. He's been changing. He acknowledged that he makes mistakes and it was because he was in a deep depression.
Madam chair, there's a letter. There's a letter in the file from DOC. I don't know if that would be a licensing entry.
Yes, I do see in the file there. Did you want to speak to that, miss Lopez? I'm sorry.
I'm it's just stating that they are not in violation.
Correct. I see that letter from the Wisconsin Department of Corrections. Okay. Questions from committee members on the police report at this time? Questions from Alderman Perez on the police report? Okay. Are there any neighbors present that wish to testify in this item? Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. We are in the 12th Aldermanic District. President Perez?
Yeah. I I guess I'll get now that I think about it, I will ask a question or two just to get it on the record because I did speak to the applicant, but I don't wanna speak on his behalf. Could you talk about I I want do you get anywhere near driving the food truck? I mean, do you drive the food truck to its location and back to the
He does not drive. He has his brother-in-law who is in charge of driving the food truck to the base and to the place. Okay.
And just if you could talk about the counseling or rehab that he's attended since the last incident. Sure.
Can you repeat that again? I'm sorry.
If you could just talk a little bit about or or mention or put on the record the rehab or counseling that is he he's been to since the last incident that he's attended or completed?
Okay. So he understand he he cannot drive. He's being in different programs. He goes to AA and he he's aware that he's cannot drive. So he's doing everything and doing deep programs to get better and to follow what he needs
to follow. Okay.
In our meeting, he told me he completed the AODA train, the AODA counseling at UCC. I want to verify that's true on the record.
Okay.
UCC. UCC. He he did completed the program.
The program has been completed? Yeah.
Alright. So
his parole officer gave him many programs for him to follow and to complete. And as of today, he had completed everything that he'd been assigned to him.
Okay. And can I ask, do you continue to go to the AA meetings on a regular basis?
Meetings. Right now, he's not going. He completed already what he needed to complete it because he's working seven days seven days every day and then maybe sometimes just one day off.
Okay. President Perez?
Yeah. No. I speaking to the I also asked him if he was had anything to drink and he said since he's been going to treatment, he has his. I just wanna get that on the record too.
He has not had a drink. And then when he's visit his parole officer, they always check his blood test and they do different testing and he's fine.
And they they test you for both drugs and
alcohol? Mhmm.
Yeah. For everything.
And you have tested negative?
Yeah. Negative.
Alright.
Have a few questions.
Okay. Can I just make a soft recommendation? I'm happy to hear that you did all the programs that they assigned to you and you completed them. But if I can recommend to you, I know that people in the alcohol and alcoholics anonymous program, it is a is a lifetime thing to help you to continue to maintain your sobriety. So I just want to make a recommendation that that you continue on with that community because I think it can be very helpful.
Okay. Not
a not a requirement. Just a Yeah. Recommendation.
Alright. And I can make a recommendation to switch with someone so that one day off he he can go to a meeting.
And then
Okay. Alright.
Thank you. Very good.
Yeah. With that, I you know, I'm satisfied with the explanation. I did say to him that if there was another incident, he could he he's at risk of losing a license. So
Understood. Thank you, president Perez. And I Alright. Well, with that, I think we can
I mean, you still
Head into committee unless he had any final comments?
He would appreciate the chance to have the license because he's trying to do something better for himself and he's keeping track. Okay.
Thank you. With that, does the committee have a motion?
I move approval.
Alright. Vice Chair Pratt has moved for approval. Any discussion on that motion? Hold Hold good? Good. Any objection? Hearing none so ordered. Thank you. Alright. Vice Chair Pratt moves to reconsider our nine: 5zero am agenda item. Anna R Perez, agent for Mi Familia's Kitchen LLC, food dealer and food peddler licenses renewal application for Mi Familia's Kitchen LLC at 626 South 5th Street. Is Anna Perez present? Yes. Hi there.
Alright. Wonderful. Can we have you raise your right hand, Anna? We'll get you sworn in.
Do you solely hear from an independent parental of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, whole truth, and a film of the truth? Yes. Thank you.
Thank you. And, Anna, are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Okay. And if you'll state your name and address for the record?
Anna Perez. 6619 West Fairview Avenue.
Okay. Thank you. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
Hold for inspection.
Thank you. Sergeant Guernejo, is there a police report?
One second. Sorry.
Okay.
Yes, on 01/2925, the applicant was cited for four dealers license required. On 04/2425, they were was convicted and has a outstanding past due of $699.
Alright. And that's still past due? Correct. Was According to okay. Alright. Anna, would you like to speak to the police report?
Yes. So I called this morning and I started a payment plan. I already I already gave a $20 payment towards the final. Okay. And I'm gonna keep paying for it. Think the next one the the next payment is in sixty days. The guy said I can do either twenty or if I can do more, and I'm sure I will be be able to move more pay pay more towards the plan. Okay.
Alright. Thank you. Questions on the police report from committee members? Alright. Who can can I ask Anna who's so did MPD come and cite you for operating without a license? Is that what happened?
No. I think it was health inspector.
Okay. It's not on the file. Alright, thank you. Is anybody from the health department here? Alright.
They're the ones that site for.
Doesn't cite for this.
So we have a license in the unit. That's it's
a possibility that you could do it.
President Perez, I'm sorry. Do you any questions?
Yeah. Just want to state that since you started the payment plan this morning, it won't register in the in the system. So if that's the case, then maybe maybe it's held and if we can verify this before council maybe move it forward or move it forward knowing that if we if it's not verified by council date, we can pull it from committee.
Sure. We could hold it and then assuming it's been verified, take it up on the special.
I I I forward the email my the email receipt that I got to to the license@milwaukee.gov.
Okay. Let's check one second, Anna. I think MPD was gonna weigh in here. Sergeant
I just got
a text from one of my officers at in the office saying that she has made a payment that that the due date is now listed for June '29. June 29. Okay.
And madam chair?
Yes. Go ahead. License division.
We did get the confirmation of payment.
Okay. So can I ask a question that
I Please?
What happens if she doesn't make the payment?
Like the next payment?
Well, because we will if if
we move forward and it's approved,
if she doesn't make the payment in June, what does what does that do to the license?
Sergeant? So, obviously, she's on a payment plan right now. So, if it was to be approved today, then it would go to committee and you guys would approve it then. If she does default on her next payment in June, then, we would report that on the next renewal as a defaulted payment and that it's got an outstanding for future.
But you'll retain the license until the following year? That's correct. Oh, President Beta?
Yeah, unless there's a move for revocation.
President Beta's?
I got the info I need.
We could still hold it if you wanted to have some dialogue with the applicant.
No, I I think I will and if there's a problem, I'll pull it back
from command.
Okay. So we'll we'll hold it today?
No, I I say move it forward if after I have a conversation if if it's not if it's not the outcome I want, then I'll come to you. I'll on the floor. I'll have it removed.
Have it sent back? Yeah.
Have it sent back.
So, you're happy to move forward with the application today? Yes, sir. Alright. Are there any neighbors present to testify in this item today? Mi Familia's kitchen? No. Alright. Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. We did just hear from president Perez but we are in the 12th Aldermanic District. Anything final, Alderman Perez?
Just I I would say my recommendation. I have no objection other than to approve with a warning letter.
Alright and I know your plan intend to talk to the applicant. Oh yeah. Very soon. So, miss Perez, be sure to make sure you connect with Alderman Perez but with that, I think we can head into committee. Does the committee have a motion?
Move approval with the warning letter.
Vice chair Pratt has moved for approval with a warning letter. Any discussion on that motion? Any objection? Hearing none, so ordered. Alright. Good luck miss Perez. Be sure to connect with President Jose Perez.
Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
We're going to move on now to our 10AM agenda item. Jasminder Singh, agent for Texas Food LLC, Class A Mal and class A liquor and food dealer licenses renewal application for Texas Food at 1201 West National Avenue. Alright, good morning to you.
Good morning,
Hi, there.
Good morning, ma'am.
Good morning, council. Do you wanna introduce yourself? Sure.
Attorney Michael Maiselman on behalf of Jasmine Nersing. Alright. And his son is here too.
Very good. Alright. Would you two raise your right hand
and we'll get you sworn in. The attorney from the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth? I do. Thank you. Thank you.
Alright. Mister Singh, are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Thank you. Thank you. And then will you each state your name and address for the record?
My name is Jasmine
Dersingh. Live I live in my House, 7227 South Courtesy Drive, Franklin.
Thank you.
Ryan Dersingh as address is 7227 South Country Drive, Franklin, Wisconsin 53132.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds.
Okay. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
At 01:12 twenty five at 06:07PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a battery. Investigation revealed two subjects were fighting inside the store, and the clerk was observed engaging in a verbal argument with the subjects. While armed with a bat, when interviewed, the clerk stated they didn't see or hear anything. However, video surveillance depicted the incident on 04/09/2025 at 08:50PM. Milwaukee police were dispatched to a violation restraining order.
The caller stated that they held a restraining order on an ex who approached them at the business, threatening them and punching their car window. The business was closed on officer's arrival. Follow-up on a different date revealed no video footage. At 09:27 twenty five, Milwaukee police were conducting an alcohol compliance checks at approximately 11:02AM. A safety cadet, not a legal age to purchase alcohol, entered the business and purchased alcohol beverage from the cashier who did not check ID. The agent was cited for sale of alcohol to underage. They were convicted and fined $451.
Alright. Would you like to speak to the police report?
Thank you, madam chair. Thank you, sergeant. So like the last one, this is these folks haven't been in front of the committee in five years. It's been renewed on the consent agenda. So to address the issues that we've had on the police report, I've submitted recently, like within the last fifteen minutes, a mitigation plan after discussing the issues and and the serious concerns that Alderman Perez has.
And I think, Fabiola, I hope you haven't I know I sent it to you, dear also. We asked that it'd be made part of the part of the file, and it addresses these issues and other issues. Regarding the first incident where there was a a fight in the in the in the store and the clerk didn't didn't acknowledge that when the police came. We are now sitting down with all of our staff, going through with them what they're they need to do and when when things happen, there's a protocol now and they get a one strike and they're fired. And so those incidents won't happen again.
It's it's the only one of that kind within the last year. And then the the other one, which was my client's fault, was the sale of an alcohol beverage to a minor. We've now obtained a an ID scanner that we've implemented and we're using We've we've already purchased it. We're not coming to you saying we're going to use it. We've already put it into into use.
And, you know, we think that the those address some of these issues, but my mitigation plan goes into much more detail about what else we're going to be doing including scheduling a meeting at the premises with the community liaison officers to walk around to see if there's any other mitigation issues that we can do regarding additional cameras, lighting, removing signs so that police can see in better. And that will be taking place we hope within the next few weeks. And including we're also going to be asking the MPD to install fuses cameras for our outdoor cameras. Right now we have 16 cameras, four of them are outside, 12 of them are inside. We have 12 very powerful lights outside positioned for maximum security but also that takes into account to not disturb the neighbors.
If there's any more specific questions, like I said, it's a full one page mitigation plan that goes over additional things that are not even on the police report. So I have I have nothing further to say. I welcome any questions.
Madam chair? Yes.
I just forward that email to the members.
Okay. Yes, I do. I'm looking at it now in my email. Alright. Questions from committee members on the police report?
Questions on the police report from Alderman Perez?
Yeah. I well, I I do wanna know the has the employee that sold the alcohol to the minor, is he at the location? Has we has he been removed from the location?
He has been from the location.
Thank you. Okay.
So he was an employee that you and you terminated his employment? Yeah.
From that location. He's not he's not working there anymore.
Okay. With to check ID all the time, you know. Plus we integrated the ID system so we scan it all the time.
So is he working at another one of your locations?
No, not at our locations. Okay.
Anything further, Alder Bennett? Yeah.
No. That was I just wanted to verify that.
Alright. Alright. Yes, we do take it very seriously. It's really unfortunate the number of businesses that have been caught selling alcohol to minors. And so it is a very serious offense and we appreciate you putting forward a mitigation plan. Madam chair, can
I ask the committee to or ask the applicant and the committee to submit that as part the record and part of his plan of operation and mitigation plan?
Yes. Would you like it added If
there's somebody who can make a motion. Yeah.
Okay.
Please. That's what yeah.
Okay. Alderman Berglis moves to add the recently submitted mitigation plan to the plan of operation for the applicant and hearing no objections are ordered. Thank you. Alright. Anything further, alderman Perez? No.
I've I've spoken to the applicant in detail and to his counsel and they know that the only dumb mistake is the one you repeat so I don't expect to have any issues with
them. Alright.
Are there any neighbors present that wish to testify on this item today? Alright. Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. Anything final before we head into committee?
I don't think there's anything else say.
I just want to say that I'm satisfied with the mitigation plan and that is part of the plan of operation. I expect them to stick to it and I think a warning letter is appropriate at this time.
Okay. Thank you. All right. With that we will head into committee. Does the committee have a motion? I am sure. Alderman Bergalis.
I appreciate that the applicant has taken steps to be proactive and have the cards, the ID scanning equipment integrated with every purchase. I appreciate that to be consistent. I think an approval with the warning letters warranted.
Okay. You will make that motion?
And I make that motion.
Alderman Peter Bergelas moves approval with a warning letter. Any discussion on that motion? Any objection? Hearing none so ordered.
Thank you
very Good luck.
Thank you.
Thank you, mister Singh.
Thanks. Thanks everybody.
You. Alright. We will move on to our 10:05AM agenda item. Agent for Dos Campitas, Tacos, Fish, and Chicken LLC. Food dealer and food pillar licenses application for Dos Campitas, tacos, fish, and chicken at 1100 West Historic Mitchell Street. Alright. Good morning. Buenos Dias.
Buenos Dias.
Yeah. Speaking to the lack of words.
Alright. Would you like to introduce yourself, attorney?
Yeah. My name is attorney Hayes, h a y e s.
Okay. Thank you.
Represent mister Ozinal Quinto. I'm actually his criminal defense attorney. So I'm here to address what is the apparently the objection to or maybe not the objection, but just the notice of the application, Rudolph, the license of Rudolph.
Alright.
And as is practice chair, if we don't want to address it, we could move approval and then hold that item open. If you do want to address it, address it fully so that we don't hold it after addressing it. So, make that choice before we proceed into any kind of questions. So as we'll proceed, I just want to make sure that, you know, we don't take don't take both paths as
it were.
Right. I'm going to get input from the local elder but we do have
to sort Yeah. Okay. So,
mister Acoto, can you raise your right hand so we can get you sworn in? The attorney in front of the
defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony we're about to give is the truth of whole truth and affirm of the truth?
Okay. Thank you. And are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
I see.
Okay. Thank you. And will you please state your name and address for the record?
Mhmm.
The street.
Okay. 1031 North 26th Street.
Alright. And your name?
Eiradio Ocelot Cotto.
Okay. Thank you. Alright. And then Carmen Broman is here again to help us with interpretation. Thank you. Okay. Very good. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
Alright. No
holds.
Okay. Thank you. Sergeant Kummejo, is there a police report?
On 12/05/2025
Oh, I'm sorry. Wait. Do you we don't want him to read it in?
No. Read it in. Okay.
But then if we're gonna discuss it, we discuss it in full. Yes.
I'm gonna
want to discuss it and hold it open. We don't discuss it and hold it open. Understood. I know that sometimes it's like it's very tempting to kind of like deal with it in part and then try and hold it or pull it back. But once we've opened the gate, might as well discuss it in full. But again, it has to be read in and then Okay. Address whether or not we're going to fully discuss it.
Got it. Sorry about that, sergeant. Go ahead.
Okay. On 12/05/2024, the applicant was charged with battery, two counts of disorder conduct, and family second degree sexual assault with domestic abuse modifier in Milwaukee County Circuit Court. It's currently scheduled for jury trial 05/04/2026.
Alright. With that, wanted to go to the local alder and get your perspective. Alder embedded. Shall we hold it open or?
I I think we should hold it open. This is pretty consistent with what we do and in many cases, I had a similar case that he said the charging and the actual verdict or disposition of plea agreement in the end was much different than what the initial charge was and I rather deal with what the outcome of the case is in order to have that weigh into the committee's decision.
Very good. Yeah, I would agree with that. As it's going to be adjudicated. I'm hearing the local elder advocate for holding the item open and I would agree but Alder Member Dallas.
This this is scheduled for next week. Would. Right. There be any harm in delaying this cycle? Just holding it?
I I don't know that it'll be settled in a at next week's hearing or trial.
When when when is the when is the hearing next week?
05:20 something. What was
the schedule?
Five five for Monday? Yeah.
Yes. The the matter is scheduled to go to a jury trial beginning Monday morning at 08:30. So it's not likely to be resolved by Monday morning. It'll Correct.
Correct. But would it be resolved in three weeks?
I would suspect it will be resolved at some point next week. Yes.
Fine. We can hold it aside for just the case.
I'm sure I'll move to hold to the call of the
application? Yeah. So he has to wait. He could it could pass today and he could begin his business or we could hold it and he's delayed another I'm
from opening his cycle and we could have the actual
outcome of the case and then make a decision then.
I thought it was a renewal. Pay every second. Application.
It's a new application.
And this is not alcohol. This is just food. It's a food truck.
That's a food truck.
You are delaying the opening of a business, and it's a there's no alcohol involved. It's a food truck.
I'll defer to the alder.
Alder. But I just wanna
ask the question if there's if if
I mean, the alder was fired. The committee,
I'm fine either way, to be honest with you. So
Whether I get a complaint in this
I think I would ask that he'd be able to he's he's he's he has two sons and he's been a responsible businessman. He's got no criminal record and I have every I I hope and I expect that the jury, if he does go to a jury trial next week, we'll we'll acquit him of each of the charges. And so he's 41 years old and he has operated in the city before and he has no violations. So I would think that it would be in the city's best interest as well as my client's best interest if he could begin operations.
Thank you, counsel.
Madam Chair.
Alderman Berglis.
Thank you. Well, if it is resolved next week, we still have the opportunity to add this to the special agenda before counsel.
I don't think I think we just heard I mean, oftentimes, these jury we see these dates in here and they they still haven't happened. That's more often than that. Of course. So I I mean, I would object to the hold. I I I believe we'll take to a roll call if you insist but we heard from the local alder who is good holding this item open and moving forward with this food license.
It's not an alcohol license. Do you wanna take your motion to a vote? Alderman Regalis. I know Alderman Alderman Alex Bauer is just coming to the table but yeah, I am objecting to the hold of this application. I think we should hear it through and not make him hold off on opening his food truck that does not contain an alcohol license. Do you want to repeat your motion, Alderman Burgales?
Hold the call of
the chair.
Alderman Peter Berglis moves to hold to the call of the chair. The chair requests a roll call vote.
Alderman Jackson? Aye. Alderman Brower?
I have to abstain. I wasn't here for the discussion.
Augamer Borgues? Aye. Augamer Borgues?
Augamer Aye.
Augamer Borgues?
Borgues?
One no, and one abstention.
Alright. I'm I'm sorry. We're delaying the opening of this business. It does not contain an alcohol license. So the motion is approved. My item is held. You'll have to wait till next cycle. Thank you.
What's the date of the next cycle? May 1.
I believe it's May 21. Or sorry. May 19. May 19.
Nineteenth.
May there's still an opportunity to add to the special.
Yes. If you get the what are you looking for? To for the matter to be entirely the jury trial to be complete and get it on the special and what what's the date? Three weeks.
Our next council meeting's the twentieth.
If the jury trial, if everything's been adjudicated, could potentially get it on the special.
Well, I believe. Yeah. I'm sorry. May 12.
May 12 is the common council and prior to the common council, there's a special licensing hearing. So, if it is adjudicated, it could theoretically get on that special. It's a consent agenda effectively. So there's no there's there's not as much evidence taking. There's not as much procedure but it could be placed on that. It could also be placed again on the licensing committee, the full blown committee on the nineteenth.
Or sorry, the
Yeah. May 19.
The nineteenth. May 19.
So May 12 is a possibility or May 19 if the matter is adjudicated.
May 12 is the consent agenda. Mhmm. And May 19 is the licensing committee.
Yes. The next committee meeting.
And does mister Ocelecorto need to do anything in order to get on the agenda for the nineteenth, or will he automatically place there at this point?
No. He wouldn't be automatically placed.
I mean, it would be up to the alder if the committee is waiting for the case to be adjudicated. We would have to get a update after the May 4 date.
Yes. Definitely stay in contact with alder Embedez's office and let him know how the matter is proceeding.
Yeah. So I should point out and and and perhaps there I looked at the judge Borowski's jury calendar for Monday, and mister Oslo Corto is out of custody. And this is a case that the date of the alleged offense was back in November and December 2024. And mister judge Borowski has two speedy trials involving homicides that are scheduled for Monday and they're both in custody. And so there is a very good likelihood, I can't say for sure, but there is a very good likelihood based upon the way the cases are prioritized in the criminal justice system that judge Borowski will need to take one of the in custody homicide defendants as opposed to mister Oslo Quoto.
And so my question would be, is mister Oslo Coto's case is still pending as of May 19, are we going to run into the same motion? Yes.
We could if the committee I I I did make an appeal. Was voted down. I would encourage you to stay in touch with Alderman Perez's office. I'm sorry that this happened today but perhaps there's an opportunity to get you guys on the special. I would I would reach out to Alderman Perez's office.
Okay. It could be at the special we move it forward and keep it open.
Yes. Exactly. I think that's a possibility. But again, please be in touch with his office. But we'll have to we'll have to move on. Thank you, attorney.
Thank you.
Thank you. Alright. We'll move on to our 10:10AM agenda item. Cullen Voss, agent for Indeed Brewing Company, Dubbed Wisconsin LLC. Public entertainment premises, license application requesting instrumental musicians, disc jockey, bands, poetry readings, patrons contest, comedy acts, one pool table, two concerts a year, and shuffleboard for Indeed Brewing Company at 530 South 2nd Street. Good morning.
Good morning.
If you'll raise your right hand, mister Vas.
Thank you.
Inform on the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and the truth?
Yes. Thank you, sir. Alright. Thank you. And are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Yes. I am.
Thank you. If you'll state your name and for the record.
Cullen Voss, v as in Victor, o s s. Twenty six twelve excuse me. 2612 North Pierce Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds? Alright.
No holds.
Okay. Sergeant Guamejo, is there a police report?
10/1125, the applicant was cited for excessive noise prohibited. Pretells pretrial scheduled for 06/2526 at 08:30AM.
Thank you. Would you like to speak to the police report, sir?
To my understanding, there's a misunderstanding. We did have our noise permit, noise variance permit, and there was a neighbor who submitted a request to the police department to issue us a citation. And as the officer said, it's still in pretrial. And we intend to pursue that with a not guilty plea.
Because you applied and and received a noise variance?
Correct. Okay. And it was approved. Had it not been approved, we would not have gone forward with the event in the way that we did.
Okay. And you're so you're gonna go ahead and go to to trial and make that point?
We have one more pretrial appearance. Hopefully, it will be resolved at that time but otherwise, yeah, we would like to maintain that we did nothing wrong.
Okay. Thank you. Any further questions on the police report from committee members at this time? Any questions from Alderman Betas on the police report? Not now. Okay. Alright. Are there any neighbors present that wish to testify on this matter today?
You got one hand. Yeah.
Who's that?
Yes. Edwin Thaves. I'm a neighbor that I'd like to testify.
Okay. Thank you. Mister Thames, can you raise your right hand and we'll get you sworn in?
The attorney from the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and a family truth?
Yes. I do. Thank you.
Thank you. Will you state your name and address for the record, mister Thebes? And then you can go right into your remarks. You'll have two and a half minutes.
My name is Edwin Thebes. 710 South 3rd Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204. I 've been a resident of Walker's Point for over twelve years and I'm here to strongly oppose the public entertainment premises license for Indeed Brewing. Branding this license would reward a business that has treated as city ordinances as optional for years. Indeed, Burring has a history of hosting public entertainment events without the required licensing.
They were firmly notified by the city months ago that these activities required continued to host unlicensed events for months while the paperwork sat in the queue. This is not a misunderstanding. It is a deliberate choice to operate outside the law. On 10/11/2025, Indeed was issued a formal to
to to maintain
volume a a at the lowest practical level. Indeed did the opposite. My measurements recorded sound levels at 86.6 decibels exceeding the legal nighttime limit by more than 40 decibels. Indeed, brewing has demonstrated they cannot be trusted to self regulate. To secure a permit reversal from Aldiperson Perez, their representative promised that speakers will be kept inside the garage doors.
This was a false statement. I have photographic evidence of the speakers outdoors. Mitigation promises are meaningless without strict oversight when a business has already proven it will provide false information to city officials to bypass regulations. We are all aware of the struggles the city officials face containing out of control nuisance behavior in established entertainment districts. Crises begin here in the failure to stop nuisance issues before they spiral.
We have seen in neighboring municipalities how failing to address these issues leads to litigation and claims that the city has created a sanctioned nuisance. If the committee grants this license to Indeed Brewing despite a documented history of noise, deception, and active prosecution, you are signaling that the rules do not matter. You are effectively authorizing a nuisance, choosing to prioritize a business's preferences over the mandatory legal rights of taxpaying residents you represent to the quiet enjoyment of their home. I urge the committee to protect the quality of life in Walker's Point and deny this license. Thank you.
Oh, perfect. Perfect timing, mister Theis. Thank you for your testimony. Did you submit your sorry.
I'm I'm
correct? Or is it your business that's in?
I live in proximity. I have 710 South 3rd Street which and the business is located in the 2nd Street. So it's nearby and I've lived here for about twelve plus years.
Okay. Thank you. Further questions for Mr. Thames from committee members at this time? Questions from Alderman Betas for Mr. Thames? Okay. Questions from the applicant for Mr. Thames at this time? Only questions please.
Yes. The only question I have is point.
very think that's
three
a to five times before the event on October 11 occurred. And the evening of that event when I was contacted by Indeed, indicated their intention to have music as loud as 90 decibels and at that time the noise variance permit had not been approved and there was concern that I had expressed about that. I don't feel that indeed brewing has been a good neighbor. I think there's other businesses in the neighborhood that have done a much better job at reaching out to neighbors and respecting noise variance. Like I mentioned, even with a valid permit, that's not a license to be as loud as you want.
I don't think that the volume was a practical level. I think it was an attentional nuisance. It was clear to me prior to the event that of Indeed were not willing to be considerate of the neighborhood.
All right. Anything further?
Nothing further. I do have
a question for Mr. Thames. Mr. Thames, is your objection to the PEP for the establishment with the way it runs a business or is it a special permanent event where they are doing something or an event outside the building?
Yeah, thank you for that question Oliver Suarez. My concern is is is really both. They've been operating activities for quite a while without a permit and even after the the city had notified them of the need for a permit for things like trivia contests and DJs and things like that, they continue to have those events even with the permit. So even without a permit. And so I have concerns that the business will continue to not follow the ordinances because they haven't in the past.
So that certainly is a concern. And then I have concerns about events that involve live and recorded music such as the event that occurred in October because I think they demonstrated their unwillingness to follow city ordinances.
And just for the record, I mean it isn't a question I I do want to thank mister Thames for several emails to our office. We are currently working on some legislation about the noise variance ordinance because he is correct. After someone applies for a variance, the application says, please keep it at a reasonable amount but there is no documented reasonable on. We're trying to figure out as through some legislation with the city attorney's office. So he is correct about that.
And I'd like to expect any establishment moving forward and look forward forward to my colleagues chiming in on how we can do enforcement and once you get a variance that it is an actual decibel level that is one acceptable that can be adhered to and that we can enforce.
Thank
you. Alright. I do have
another question though but it is mister Thayes mentioned that they were out with without a public entertainment informed by it. He said something about it being in limbo But I I wanna know what what that means either from the license division or maybe from the applicant. Could you repeat that? Mister Thames mentioned in his testimony that the paperwork was in limbo. Or maybe mister Davis you can tell us what that means?
Yeah, thanks for that question. So my understanding is I had noticed on the Indeed Brewing Milwaukee website that they were hosting a number of public entertainment activities and I had reached out to the licensing committee regarding those activities. And the licensing committee had informed me that they did not have the required public entertainment premises license for the activities that they've long had, such as trivia contests, murder mysteries, dating nights, DJs, and so on. And my understanding is that even after the licensing committee had informed in deburring of the need for public entertainment premises license, they continue to host these unlicensed events while the permit application was being processed.
Is is there any follow-up to that by either the license division or maybe anyone can get mister Thames forwarded to someone that they were still operating. Was there any action taken?
I know we received a few emails from him and it was stated that his objection would be add to the file, but if there were any events of entertainment that he should call the police since our office does not enforce, I'm not sure if he ever did as there's nothing They're
not in the record today, so that's why I'm concerned about that.
I'll have to look for those.
Okay. And this is a new application so you're taking over indeed or?
This is just just the PEP. Oh, it's just the PEP before.
Okay. So you had you had your yes. Because I can picture Indeed brewing, but you didn't have a PEP.
That's right.
Were you asking for temporary PEP's from licenses in the elders office?
I don't believe we did that. Okay. Yes. And I do take full responsibility. I'm a fairly new agent. Indeed has been around for about six point five years and I've been there about three. It was my understanding, which is now I understand a false understanding that when it's a third party that is taking the payments and we're just providing the space that there wasn't an additional license that was needed. I am committed to being a good neighbor. I want indeed to succeed. I want the neighborhood succeed.
And I do try my best and I'm very apologetic for being in this situation. And as far as the events go, if we hadn't had our noise variance permit, we would not have carried out the event as we did. Our sound engineer provided new speakers a day before the event that couldn't even go over the allowed decibel limit that we spoke with the Alderman's office about, which as he stated, there is no set decibel limit and we impose that on ourselves to try and be a good neighbor during that event. And there were also multiple events going on that night in the neighborhood. So I'm not sure how Mr. Thabes would know that that music and sound was coming from us affecting his residence.
Because I I walked over to the corner of 60 feet and recorded it on a decibel
Alright. To read
it again. Say yes.
Thank you, mister Thames.
There was
Mister Thames, I'm sorry. We're done listening to witness testimony. I'm just letting the applicant have the floor a bit and then we have to get moving here.
I understand that, but the applicant He
didn't he didn't ask a question of you. Let let's just let him finish his comments here.
Yes. I I do have an email from mister Thames to a bar manager at Boone and Crockett during their final fest which occurred on the same night and they had a much bigger stage with much louder music. So again, I don't know how he can prove that the noise he heard in his residence came from us. Okay.
Did I ask for neighbors already? Okay. Yeah. That's how we Alright. Yes. We so I'd I'd like to ask a question and then I'll go to you, Alderman Bergales. So in mister Thave's testimony, he mentioned microphones, I'm sorry, speakers outdoors or facing outdoors. I I find that that's not a good practice. I mean, that you're bound to get noise complaints if you're using amplified sound outdoors. Are you committed to are you is that your intent or can you make a commitment to use your amplified sound inside of your business and not place anything outdoors?
Yes. The so for that event we got the our original intention was to have a stage outside for the big block party that we were doing for our fall event. As part of our sound mitigation plan, we decided to move that stage into the garage. So the stage setup, the drums, the guitars, everything was inside except for two monitors, two speakers that could not fit in that section and this was all happening a day before the event took place. But moving forward, again, which is why I asked why we hadn't had a chance to meet, I would like to take neighborhood input and talk to neighbors face to face, give them a layout of what we're capable of and work with them because I'm not interested in being a nuisance.
I don't think we have been. As Mr. Thabes is the only individual we've ever interacted with who has had negative things to say. But I would like to keep the dialogue open and make sure that this doesn't happen again.
Okay. Thank you. Alderman Bergelis?
Thank you, Madam Chair. Business has been there for six years. You've been there for three. Question for licensing. Was there ever a PEP application in the past?
And then while licensing is looking that up, when did you learn that you needed a public entertainment premises license?
I don't have the specific date.
Yesterday or a year ago, Two years ago?
A few months ago.
A few a few months ago. And how long between learning that you needed a pet did you apply for one?
It was one of the owners who is here today, so he would have a better understanding. He's the one who submitted that. But to my knowledge, it was nearly immediately after we decided what how
many unlicensed activities did you have in your project between your application date and today?
It could be as many as a dozen.
Did you know that
you would get a provisional one time special event permit for public entertainment from elder person's office?
wasn't aware that that was an option.
So my concern is that you knew you needed a license and you willingly, knowingly operated without one after applying for a license. That's That's a problem. That's problematic for me. Thank you, madam chair.
Thank you. Anything further from committee members? License division.
To answer Alderman Brigalis' question, indeed had a license for a temporary public 2019 and 2022. They never held a set. So those are just in special temporary ones. Correct. Okay. Thank you.
Alright. Anything further from committee members? Alright. We are in the 12th Alderman District. Alderman Perez?
Yeah. I was also on the impression after meeting the the pep license that that would be it for peps until then. So, I'm I'm a little disappointed about that because it was brought to the attention that he did need entertainment license as as for any of the events whether it's board games or whatever the case may be. So I'm a little knowing he needed that not to do him anymore until then is is somewhat of a problem for me on the especially after the amount of communication from the clarity from I guess the mister Dave, the complainant and having the license division ready to to issue those if needed. So the excessive noise, I believe there was I did deny the for the record, I did deny the noise variance until the applicant reassured me in writing that they could keep it to 90 decibels at 50 to 75 feet.
I did approve it. It was a last minute approval, but based that I had that in writing, I did do that. I think since then, we've when I talked about the legislation, we're looking at lowering it down to 75 at 75 feet. We're trying to get that right but with that said, I think he's trying to correct things the right way. They've been there a long time.
I appreciate mister Thames and the communication in this office and bringing some of these things forward. Not everyone's paying attention to some of the license licenses like he is. We need more people in the neighborhood to do a lot more of that. So it's kind of a tough one. I don't want to shut these guys down for ten days, but there's something that has to give and I understand that he wants to do things right and he's doing them now. And the establishing, your hours, you close at 11:00 on weekends?
Yes. Yeah. It's not
like it's a bar time establishment. So I'd I'd I'd wanna take mister Thay's complaint serious and I also want indeed to take their licenses very serious.
Yes. Well said, Alderman Perez. I just want to echo Alderman Perez's sentiments that we really appreciate mister Thave's taking the time out to advocate for his neighborhood but also acknowledge the applicant is trying to right his wrong. Alderman Burgales?
When we're in committee.
Okay. I think that we are going to head into committee with that. Oh, do you or perhaps I should allow the applicant. Do you have any final brief remarks you want to make before we head into committee to make a motion?
Not at this time.
All right. Alderman Bergalis.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I'll move approval for this. I don't think that a trivia night is a threat to the health and safety and welfare of the public. Right? The noise issues are the noise issues, and that will likely come up for the regular renewal for the Class B Tavern or for the alcohol license later. But I will move approval with a warning letter right away to be consistent with our discipline that we have expressed with extended hours establishments operating without a license. I think although this is a new application, it would be prudent and it would be prudent to approve the license with a warning letter off the bat.
Madam Chair?
All right.
Yes. Just for clarification, when we have a brew pub like this, I believe those those entities unless they have a specifically a tavern license, those entities are licensed by the state outside of Louisville. So they there is no tavern or alcohol license that the city of Milwaukee has issued that is state issued because this is a brew probe. Can I get clarification from license division on that?
Yeah. That's correct. Indeed did previously hold a Class B Tavern license that was changed. I forget what year when the full service permit permit was then required. They did apply for that in 2024 and it's been done. So, that is through the state.
Venture. Yes. Please. Yeah. I just wanted, yeah, I I support this motion though. I I think, yeah. Thank you so much.
Thank you. Alright. Alderman Peter Bergelis has moved for approval with a warning letter. Any further discussion? Any objection? Hearing none so ordered. Good luck to you.
Thank you.
Thank you. Okay. With that, I'll pass the gavel to Alderman Peter Bergalis. Yes, of course.
Next on our agenda item ten twenty, I welcome Alderman Chambers. Wayne Wang, agent for Nye Entertainment Inc, class B Tavern and Republic Entertainment Premises License Renewal Application for Dragon's Place at 7200 West Fond Du Lac Avenue. License expires 06/19/2026. Is Rain Wang present?
Yes. I am.
Thanks. Welcome. Please and are you counsel?
My name is Chi Wang. I'm her husband.
Alright. Please raise your right hand to be sworn in.
Do you solemnly hear from the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and the family of the truth? Yes. Yes. Thank you.
Thank you. Are you in receipt of today's are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied?
Alright. Please state your name and address for the record.
Rayne Wayne. 4320 West Villard Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53218.
And yourself, sir?
Yeah. My name is Chi Wayne. Same address, 4320 West Villa Avenue, Milwaukee 53218.
Alright. Thank you for that. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds.
Sergeant Kanye Kanye Kanyejo, are there is there a police report?
The following items are related to 7200 West Fond Du Lac Avenue. On 03/2925 at 12:52AM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a noise nuisance. Officers encountered a subject playing loud music from the motorcycle. Requested they turn it down to which they complied. On 04/1725 at 12:11AM, Monkey Police were dispatched to a battery. Investigation revealed several subjects were fighting inside the establishment due to seeing arrangements. The business was cooperative and requested all parties to leave the establishment. On 05/1825 at 09:53PM, Monty police were dispatched to battery. The victim refused to speak to officers and left the scene. The business was cooperative.
On 12/04/2025 at 12:27AM, Monty police were dispatched to shots fired. Manager stated the family was causing a disturbance and were asked to leave. When a small flight took place in outside, the manager stated they did not hear any shots fired and everyone had already left. On 04/05/2026 at 02:22AM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a battery. Investigation revealed the victim and suspect worried and verbal argument which eventually turned physical causing the victim to be knocked out. The victim was unconscious, had a pulse, but not breathing. Officers observed major swelling and bleeding to the face. The victim was transported to a hospital where officers were informed they would survive. However, was likely suffer long term commutative delays. Follow-up was conducted with the agent who provided video surveillance of the incident.
Sergeant, would that come like to speak to the items on the police report?
And just pull that microphone closer so we can hear you.
I've got you.
Can you hear me now? Okay. So for all of the issues that was mentioned, I believe my staff handled them very well by getting the the patients out of the building and getting them dispersed in off of the prop property inside and out. In regards to this last incident that was
where is this one?
Four or five.
Yes. Four or five. Thank you. This happened hours after our our our our tavern was closed. Our staff was just closing down during the end of the night procedures inside the building. I believe my security did do his job. Earlier, he got disbursed. There was a video provided that he was separating the two victims. He got them to get in their car and leave. All of my staff was in the building, said they went into the night procedures, and one of the gentlemen's the victim came back.
My security, seeing that this gentleman pulled up on the video camera, and he went out there to once again stop the incident from happening. He's only one person. The rest of my staff did stay inside the building because he told them, no. He never knows what happens. All of my bartenders are females. You know, he's security. He went out there to handle the situation. It didn't go so well. The gentleman did get hurt, but I believe my staff did do everything they were supposed to do. My security ran back in, told the bartender to call 911, which they did. He went back out there and stayed next to the victim until the personnel showed up, the medical personnel showed up.
Alright. Thank you. Does the committee have any questions for on the police report? Does the local alder have any questions on the police report? Alright.
Are there any neighbors present that wish to testify on this item?
Yes, it is. There's one.
One online. I'm sorry. I can't read your name that far away. Please raise your right hand and we'll swear you in. You'll have two minutes. You'll have two and half minutes on the clock.
Do you solemnly affirm that the Pennsylvania subpoena of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, whole truth, and nothing of the truth?
And then can you give us your name and address, please?
Absolutely. My name is Asia Lane. I live at 3323 North 22nd Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53206.
I am here on
the behalf
you very much, Ms. Lane. Your two and a half minutes start now.
Yes. I'm here on the behalf of my brother, Alan Lane, and I'm also speaking from my professional role as a licensed social worker here in Milwaukee County. I reviewed all the videos, and this incident is very unfortunate. And for it to be dissipated as if it was just a fight and as if, oh, her security did everything he could. You have one security officer for an entire bar.
My brother has a long time impairments from this incident. It is suggested that your security acting at this establishment protected my brother and he didn't. However, there was nothing visible to identify him as a security. No uniform, no badge, no clear indication of authority. From a safety and regulatory standpoint, that is a serious failure.
Under Wisconsin statute four four zero point two six, individuals performing private security functions are required to be properly credentialed and identifiable while on duty. Additionally, alcohol license establishments operating under chapter 125 has an obligation to maintain order and protection for the health and safety and welfare patriots. At the local level, Milwaukee Common Council in the city of Milwaukee licensed division enforces ordinances that require license premises to operate in a manner that does not endanger public safety or contribute to disorderly conduct. And from what I observed on those videos, there was a lack of visible, structured security present at a critical moment when intervention could have prevented this from happening. You all allowed these two people, individuals, my brother and mister Brown, to be at this establishment after there was an incident.
I don't care who came back. It is a public failure of what happened that night at that bar. Speaking as a social worker, I assess environments every day for risk, safety, and harm reduction. This situation reflects a breakdown in basic protective factors. It is not trauma informed.
It was not preventative, and it did not prioritize human safety. Your one security guard that did not have one any identifiable security wear left my brother in the middle of the street to die after he vaguely tried to break the incident up. My brother is now living with a severe TBI, and he may never function again. We have had to get guardianship of my brother, and he may have to live in a long term care facility. He now has a drink and a feeding tube.
Thank you, miss Leach. Your your time has expired. I appreciate your comments. We'll first go to committee members. Do any committee members have questions for this witness?
I do have a question. Your security, is it license and bonded?
Let's start with let's with the neighbor first and then we'll we'll move into more Oh, my follow ups. Any questions for the witness online from the committee? Any questions from the local alder for this witness? No question. Does the applicant have any questions? Questions only for the witness?
I do have questions. Okay.
Go ahead. Only questions directed to the witness.
Right. So my question is so the contestants had made a statement with my security is not wasn't doing the proper procedures. So we're we're we
have to we have to this is this is your opportunity to ask questions of the witness. You'll have another opportunity later to make a further statement.
Right. Then
my question right comes now, you can only ask questions of the witness.
That's what I'm gonna do. I say so besides, you know, the uniforms and what other things that she observed that my security wasn't doing the proper procedure besides, you know, ask the patient to leave the premises. And then, of course, this all happened after the bar closed.
Miss Leach, did you hear that question?
Yes, sir. As
a bar who hires a security company, your job is to ensure that all patriots for one are no longer lingering at the bar. Not only did this incident occur with my brother on April 5, there was another incident on April 6
Well, I'm sorry, mister Leech.
Miss Leech, this is the opportunity for the applicant to ask
you to pass it That's basically what I'm
saying. Okay.
So One security cannot cover an entire bar.
Alright. Anything else related to the question, miss Leach?
No, sir.
Okay. I appreciate that.
Get on here and play with me.
Any other questions for that witness?
Also, according to a police report.
Chief. No.
No other questions? Okay.
Thank you
very much. Thank you, miss Leach. I appreciate you coming to testify and advocate on behalf of your brother. This is in the 2nd Aldermanic District. Alderman neighbors.
I don't know if any of our neighbors.
We just had one. Alderman Alderman Chambers, welcome.
Thank you, mister chair and committee members. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to come speak. You know, the reason why we are here quite frankly is because of item number eight. It is it was an unfortunate incident. It did lead to charges being filed against assailant for the incident with, you know, the the victim.
What I do know speaking from the speaking to the police captain is that reviewing the footage from the establishment which mister and missus Wang has been fully cooperative, including to the security which is bonded and insured, is that there was an incident where the the victim and his companion, you know, there was something that happened unfortunate. The victim did not like it. It. There was some scuffling between the two the parties. Security did escort them out.
You know, once the scuffling happened, they both left the establishment. One left the establishment, and then the victim came back to the establishment after bar closed, and the video is fire off.
Saw by the security to come back.
And you're not in
victim was, you know, it's it's I thought on social media, and it's very unfortunate. He did not deserve what happened. However, this establishment has been well ran for the past three years since it's been open. As you can look on the police report, every year besides this year was a little uptick. There's been one item the past couple of years since it's been open.
Miss Wang and I have spoke into great length especially after this incident because we cannot have that incident happen in the 2nd District and she's agreed with it. So, there's some parameters that I'd be put in place that, you know, miss Wang and I will put in, you know, that have this wind to heavy discussion with. So, what I would recommend today will be an approval with a warning letter.
Alderman Chambers, thank you for your comments. Any questions from committee members before we give a final word to the applicant? Alderman Chambers? Alderman Jackson?
No problem. Thank you, mister chair. Your plan of plan operation doesn't have security on it, but you have security?
I do.
Would you like to amend your plan of operation to have security?
Yes, sir. How many?
How many?
And what time are they there all the time?
And then how many?
I have on the weekend, I have two securities, and then I have one during the week because during the week, it's really slow. If I have events during the week, then I up my security to two or three.
Alright. Minimum one is probably best.
Yeah.
So minimum one security to be amended to the application.
And you you agree to do that. Alderman Jackson moves to amend the plan of operation to include a minimum of one security officer at all times. Any objections to that motion? Hearing none, so ordered. Any other questions for the applicants? Brief closing statement, if you will. Or if you like, give you an opportunity before we head into committee.
Yes. So me and my wife, this is our third year going to the fourth year. We never operated bar before. We all but in the records, normally during the day, she would stay home with the kids. We got a nine and seven years old, and I usually at the bar just managing stuff. And then, like I said, we are trying to follow all the rules that's laying in front of us. You can see the records. Like, first year, we get a call. People complain noise. And then, yeah, we the next year, we comply for getting a license for our car show.
So we follow every step of the way. And just unfortunate, these things happen, and we just feel bad because this is hurting our community. But at the same time, after this happened, we closed on the three days. We have a staff meeting. We have a security meeting with local officers that come and patrol our areas. They they promise they will come and patrol more often and also during the closing time. So we do everything aspect, any aspect we can do to improve the safety. And then and also we had to determine the security that was being indicated being present at this incidents and we hired a new
All right. Thank you for that. We are now in committee. Are there any motions?
Alderman Jackson. Thank you, mister chair. I move approval with a warning letter.
Alderman Jackson moves approval with the warning letter as amended. Any discussion on that motion? Any objections? Hearing seeing none. So ordered. Thank you very much. Good luck. Thank you. Moving on to our next 10:25AM agenda item. Givante Ball, agent for Lush Social Lounge LLC Class B Tavern Public Entertainment Premises Food Dealer License Renewal Application with change of hours from closing at 10PM every day to close at 12AM every day for Lush Social Lounge at 59385940 North 76th Street expired 01/21/2026. Welcome. Giovanni Mall present. Yep. Please raise your right hand. We'll swear you in.
Thank you. From an independent superior of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is a true, the whole truth, and a film of truth?
Thank you.
Are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with that with the possibility that your application may be denied?
Alright. Please state your name and address for the record.
My name is Gigante Elmore. Address 5938 Dash 40 North 76th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53218.
Alright. Thank you. Miss Lopez, are there any holds? No holds. Sergeant, are there any is there
a police report? 01/2023 at 09:30PM, Milwaukee Police conducted a licensed premise check. At the listed address. Investigation revealed the business did not have a proper license to serve alcohol despite the agent admitted they were serving. The alcohol was confiscated by an agent from the Wisconsin Department of Revenue and the agent was advised they could not open for business until proper license was obtained.
On 08/1624, 11:53PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a troubled subject. This was due to a citizen complaints. The business was operating after hours. On arrival officers found the business was closed and employees were cleaning up. It was on scene and stated a few patrons that were still unseen just received a free order and were leaving. They also requested to see license. However, they have stated they were at home. They were advised to post them in a manner in which the public can see them. Officer noted at the time of the report, they were unable to locate any licenses for the business. At 08:24 twenty four, 11PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a tavern violation.
Officers were advised the business was open past their hours of operation. On arrival, officers observed the strip mall parking lot was full with subjects gambling. Inside the establishment, the officer observed subjects gather around the bar with liquor bottles on the soap on the on the bar top. After approximately five minutes of knocking, the agent came to the door and denied the subjects at the bar were patrons, stating they were employees who were cleaning up. The agent could not provide the business license and admitted they did not know where they were, but the alderman could confirm the license status.
The agent further stated the subject's loitering in the parking lot were from neighbor neighboring business and not theirs. 9424 at 10:08PM, Monkey Police conducted a licensed premise check. The officer positioned their squad in a manner in which the they had full view of the business. Subjects were observed entering the business, however, quickly exited and returned to their vehicles. The business lights were off and the last subject exited at 10:38PM and were observed securing the entrance door.
On 11/06/2024 at 08:30PM, Milwaukee Police conducted licensed premise check. This was due to multiple complaints. The business was operating without a license. Consisting in this effort was an agent from Wisconsin Department of Revenue and the Milwaukee Health Department. Investigation revealed the business did not have a license to operate. However, the officers observed the deep hookah tobacco products and a fully stocked bar with beer coolers. All the alcohol and tobacco products were confiscated at inventory by the Milwaukee by Wisconsin Department of Revenue. The officers explained to the agent they there was a hold on the license and therefore they could not operate. The citation for food dealers license required was issued. They were convicted and fined $699.
On 11/07/2024 at 07:46PM, Milwaukee Police conduct a license premise check. Also observed the exterior business lights were off and the door was locked. However, we're able to see subjects smoking hookah through the window. The agent was on scene and up and opened the door seeing they were not open for the business and were only cleaning. The agent stated the hookah was for their own personal use.
On 04/2525 at 09:20PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a subject with weapon. The business was the caller and stated subjects were escorted out of the escorted out for arguing inside when they began to physically fight in the parking lot. The subjects were gone on police arrival, and the business was cooperative. On 05/2225 at 07:24PM, Milwaukee Police conducted a licensed service check. Assisting in this assignment was an agent from Wisconsin Department of Revenue.
Violations were found. Licenses were not publicly posted. A slush machine with no label or ingredient list, empty alcohol bottles on the shelves, and no invoices of alcohol purchases. All unopened bottles of alcohol were confiscated. On 12/04/2025 at ten:twenty 3PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a subject with weapon.
On arrival, officers observed a full parking lot to the east of the establishment along with parking violations. The officers directed the vehicle operators to obtain legal parking. The caller was no longer on scene and stated they would return to speak with officers. However, never returned. Security stated there was no one in the business with weapons and a search of each patron is conducted thoroughly including women's purses.
The business provided officers with paperwork for temporary change of plan in order to operate past normal operating hours. The business was fully cooperative with officers. On 12/1125 at 06:50AM, Milwaukee police took a walk in theft that occurred in the business at approximately 01:30AM. The victim stated altercations were taking place. Therefore, they were leaving. When they were approached by a suspect who took their chain off their neck, the victim stated they did not report the incident to security and did not call police from the location. On 02/1426 at 08:30PM, Monty Police conducted a licensed premise check. This was in regards to an accidental issuance of a provisional license. The agent was on scene and cooperated with officer's request to close until they issued a license to operate.
Okay. Would you like to speak to the police report?
Yeah. I do wanna say that I was in 2024, I wasn't aware that I wasn't supposed to be operating. I wasn't aware that there was a hold on my license. Once I was made aware, I did.
You didn't know you needed a license to
ops No. No.
I did know from the first time that I had the issue, but I wasn't aware that there was a hold on my license. But what I once I was made aware that there was a hold on my license, I did close until
I'm sorry.
Just just to be clear, which license are you
talking about?
He said it was an incident where I had a hold on my license and I was operating. I didn't know that there was a hold on my license.
Your driver's license?
No. No. Not my driver's license. My my business license. Yep. Yep. I wasn't aware, but once I was made aware, did close and did take the proper precaution to do what I need to do to make sure that I was able to get the hole removed before I proceeded with business. As far as anything else, it wasn't anything else too too much that I want wanted to speak on in regards to it wasn't you said what, sir? You you were caught
operating your business multiple times without a license. Would you like
to explain why? The first time I was operating without a license, that was in 2023. I wasn't aware. I didn't I I wasn't serving alcohol, but I wasn't aware that I needed a license to operate. I was operating as basically, like, just a vent hall space, but I was, I guess, made aware that I needed a alcohol license to operate even as well.
And and in 2024, when I was operating without the license, I I was obtained a license. I went to licensing, and I was granted a license, but I and I paid everything. I just wasn't aware that there was a hold on my license. Once I was made aware that there was a hold on my license, I did take the precautions to get the hold removed, and I also closed until the the precaution was taken. It was only two incidents where I was actually fined by operating without a license. That was in 2023 and 2024. And in 2024, I was granted a license, but there was a hold.
Okay.
How has business been the last couple months?
For me, business has been good. It's been growing. We have been receiving more traffic in a positive way. We've as far as when you when you ask that question, what are you speaking on just business?
Because this tells me that your license expired January 29.
Correct. And I'm on a provisional license right
now. Provisional?
Yes, sir. I'm currently operating on provisional license that doesn't expire until, I believe, late May. So that's why I'm able to continue to operate, but business has been fine the last couple of months.
Okay. Does the committee have any questions about the police report? Does the local alder have any questions about the police report? Nope. Alright. Are there any neighbors present that wish to testify? Any neighbors wish to testify about Lush?
Okay. This
is in the 2nd Aldermanic District. Alderman Chambers. I think it's a couple people actually. There are some people online. Hi. Are are you are you here to speak about yes. We can hear you. Are you here to speak about lush social life?
I don't think I have a bad connection, though. But I wanted to talk about the garbage
Hold on one second. Garbage in the bag.
Hold on one second.
Ma'am, are you are you here to test to testify about lush?
To talk about lush?
Please raise your right hand. We'll swear you in.
You solemnly
go ahead.
Do you solemnly affirm on the defense apprentice of of saw the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is a true, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Yes. Alright. We will put two and a half minutes on the clock for you. Please start with your name and address and then your time will start then.
Okay. I prefer not to get my address, Natasha Williams. I am tired of the garbage in the bag. The garbage is everywhere with glass. I I'm constantly getting flats back there. There's rats back there. They do not clean up. The garbage is horrible. I have had it with the garbage back there. Furthermore, some days I come in and wait. They'll park in the alley. Now granted, yes, they will move if I go knock on the door, but I shouldn't have to come home at night and knock on the door to ask them to move their cars. That garbage is terrible. I really want them to do something about that garbage or either close down. There's no way that garbage should be that disgusting.
It's I've been talking to the alderman for over a year now. There has not
been any
changes. He stated the earlier that their their business has picked up and so forth. Right. It has. So therefore, the garbage increased. Get a bigger container. Get two. Get three. Get a broom. Do something to get that alley clean. You guys are not paying for my for my tires back there. You're not cleaning up back there. You're not paying for the rats. I can't even sit in my backyard without the rats back there. We've never had that problem. Everyone's complaining about this garbage back here. There's a language barrier to some of the people in the neighborhood, but everyone's fed up with this garbage. They need to do better with the garbage. That's my main concern, and please stop parking in the alley.
Alright. That's
it. That's all I have. Okay.
Thank you very much for your testimony. Are there any questions from committee are there any questions from committee members or this witness? Mister Chair. Alderman Brower?
Yeah. Just a quick question. So when you can you just define parking in the alley? You're you're saying they're obstructing the alley or using the alley to park on a slab that's
They're using the power to park against the building. There's no slab back there. They're parking against the building.
Okay. So it's obstructing the use of the alley then?
Yes. Okay. Now, again, when I do ask, they do move. Okay? But I shouldn't have to get out my car when I get home late at night to knock on the door. Okay. Ask them to move.
Are there any other questions from committee members? Any questions from the local alder?
No questions. Thank you for testifying.
Any questions from the applicant for the witness? Questions only.
Yes. We did and I don't mean any harm when I ask this question. We did hold a committee meeting yesterday. Is it a particular reason why you've been wanting to attend the meeting?
Because I spoke with you guys on numerous occasions. Occasions. I spoke with you guys when you first opened. I spoke with you in passing. I
this this is all I got.
I mean, it's self explanatory to do the gar I wouldn't even be here if you guys would've just seen the garbage out. That's my only right. Okay. And we had this conversation.
Do you do you have my contact my direct contact information?
Sir, I I I I'm not trying to get you set, though. I just want you guys to clean the alley.
That's all I ask.
Okay.
That's the only thing
I promise you. That's all I ask. Okay.
self explanatory, you guys go out there before when you close when you open. That's all I'm asking.
Okay. Thank you. I appreciate it. And I I understand. I appreciate that.
You're welcome.
Thank you for justifying it. It looks like we have another hand up. Bid sorry, I can't read that far away. Bid 31.
Please It's yeah. It's Stephanie Harling from bid thirty one.
All right. Stephanie, please raise your right hand and we'll swear you in. Then you'll give us your name, address, you'll have two and a half minutes to provide your testimony.
Okay. Do you solely inform an independent parentage of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Yes, I do. Thank you.
And your name and address, please.
Stephanie Harling, Havenwoods Business Improvement District, 6671 West Mill Road.
All right. Thank you.
Two and a half.
You're welcome.
I just wanted to comment. I have had conversations with the applicant about the trash. I've seen the photos of the trash. I can attest to the extreme of it and I've seen the max and we have offered assistance with paying for cameras for them in the alley. We have security grants. We have lighting grants that the applicant has not pursued with us. So I will say that it appears to be a lack of willingness to solve the problem over the past few years. Perhaps that
will change today. I hope so.
But generally speaking, when we have to deal with situations like this, it really takes it not only sucks up police resources, DNS resources, it also sucks up the resources for bids and nonprofits that are working in the neighborhood. So now I've spent an hour and a half on this this meeting, and then I've spent numerous hours going back and forth with neighbors about this issue. It's time from events and more positive activities for communities. So this does become a detriment on the community in that way alone. So my support of this application right now is just nonexistent unless we hear something more positive and we see proof of cooperation to make this a better situation.
Okay. Thank you for your testimony. Any questions from committee members? Any questions from the local alder?
No. Thank you for testimony.
Any questions from the applicant?
Yes. And like I said, don't mean any disrespect when I ask these questions, Stephanie, but is there a reason why you didn't attend the meeting yesterday?
Yes. Truth be told, I belong to Symphonic Orchestra, and that was our performance last night. Otherwise, I would have been there.
Okay.
That said, I I did have staff that was working that meeting.
Yeah. Yeah. Meeting possible for you.
Yeah. Thank you. I appreciate that as well. I just wanted to ask that question. Thank you.
No problem.
Alright. Thank you very much. Thank you for your testimony. Are there any other neighbors present that we should testify on this item? Hearing none, we this is in the 2nd Aldermanic District, Alderman Chambers.
Thank you, mister chair. And know, mister Mull is is correct about some of the mishaps early on. He and I had extensive conversations prior to we did host a pretty robust meeting yesterday where some residents, nine total, was able to come and express concerns, hash out some of the issues that was going on. For those who are not familiar with this area, this is located right on the intersection of 76 and Floors. There is another establishment that is right next door.
Mister Mull has has made some adjustments. I I do want to put some on the record that mister Mull probably would agree to is with the plant operation far as the trash because that is one of the biggest concerns that we have. He has agreed to a bigger receptacle and for his garbage pickup to be twice a week on Mondays and Fridays. So we could put that on the plan of operation on the the plan if he can agree to that.
That's true. Hold on a second. Would you agree to amend your plan of operation to reflect garbage collection on Monday and Friday every week?
Yep. And to agree to a bigger recept acle as well.
Yep. We can't I don't think that we can add that to the to the we can Okay. Bigger bigger than what? Bigger.
Bigger than what I currently have, I guess.
Yeah. Or bigger within what do you currently have?
I currently have, I believe, a four yard. Okay. So I can
So larger than four yard?
Yeah. I can take it up to a six yard and like I said, take the pickups to twice a week.
I'm gonna move forward then.
I would say probably go eight but it's up to you.
Okay. Alden Brouwer moves to amend the plan of operation for garbage pickup from a dumpster larger than four yards. Twice per week. Hearing no objections to that motion, the plan of operation is amended.
Alright. Thank you. Thank you mister chair and thank you to mister Moe for agreeing to that.
Yeah. He
and I have had again extensive conversations far as concern, far as you know, management and some of the loitering and the police report to where you know, it's just unacceptable, you know, currently but however, I I I am optimistic that he will you know, get things right but you know, he knows what he needs to do. He knows what we we spoke about. So, I'm prepared to to recommend approval with a twenty day suspension due to failure to plan the plan of operation. However, with the time change that's currently on there, some residents had yesterday at the ESA meeting has expressed concern to that but I will leave that up to the committee to make that decision as far as whether they want to approve the the time change. But that will be my recommendation for this establishment.
All right. Thank you very much, Alderman Chambers. Any questions from committee for the applicant before we'll give you an opportunity to make a closing statement. But any questions from committee right now? We'll welcome your closing statement if you'd to make one.
Okay. Well, I do wanna say that this is like my first my first time entering this business is like having a a restaurant in Lyle Day obtains a class b tower or license. Every day, I do work hard and effectively to make sure that I'm making the proper transitions to make the make everything make sense for myself as well as community as as far as managing and as far as making the decisions to make sure that we are doing everything that we could do to not be a nuisance to the community but also be a help to the community as well. I do wanna add that we are very active in the community in ways I've done two book bag drives 2024 and 2025. I did two back to school drives.
I also did a toy drive giveaway and I also feed the homeless on a regular basis with any extra food that we have that we may not be able to sell due to anything like that. But I do appreciate the opportunity as well and I appreciate Alderman Chambers and like he said, we we do talk often and we work often as far as like making sure that we can communicate to help me understand that way that I should be managing my establishment. And I would not be opposed to having regular meetings with the community to make sure that I can hear their concerns as well.
Okay. We are in committee. Any motions?
okay. I'll
Alder Woman Pratt.
I'll move for approval of the Class B Tavern Public Entertainment and Food Dealer License. And I moved for approval with a twenty day suspension. As amended. As amended.
Based on the hours or no?
And I moved to deny the hour change.
Okay. And then?
No. Based on evidence I mean, based on the preponderance of evidence, given by the applicant and the police report, automatic testimony that demonstrates operational results in a threat to health safety and welfare or and that they are not operating to the plan of operation.
Alright. Alderwoman Pratt moves renewal of the Class B Tavern, a public entertainment premises and food dealer license renewal applications with no change of hours. Based on the based on the preponderance of the evidence as amended, based on the preponderance of the evidence in the police report, resident testimony, aldermanic testimony, and applicant testimony that the operation that demonstrates the operation results in a threat in health, safety, welfare of the public and failure to comply with the approved plan of operation.
You didn't note the suspension days, Mr. Chair?
As and oh, Elderwoman Pratt moves for approval of the Class B Tavern public entertainment premises and food dealer license renewal applications with no change of hours with a suspension of twenty days. Based on the preponderance of the evidence in the police report, resident testimony, aldermanic testimony, testimony that demonstrates the operation results in the threat to the health welfare of the public and failure to comply with the approved plan of operation. Any discussion on that motion? Any objection to that motion?
The second motion as well, I think.
You may want to clarify that there was a denial of the change of operation. That might a separate action.
Which would you like to do first? Were
You want me to restate it separately?
I included He included the Okay.
That, but
you stated it separately. So you stated it as two separate motions.
It was then included. Maybe for clarity For clarity, this motion is also a denial of a change of the hours of operation from closing to ten every day to close at twelve a. M. Every day. Everyone clear on the motions? Any objection on the motions? Hearing none, so ordered.
The committee will be completing a report of its findings of fact, inclusions of law recommending to the common council that your license be renewed with a twenty day suspension. You'll receive a copy of that report. You will have the opportunity to file written exceptions to that report. If you do file written exceptions, they must be received by the city clerk by May 6. If you written exceptions, you will also have the opportunity to appear before the Milwaukee common council. When it considers this matter on May 12 in the common council chambers of City Hall, please be further advised this report is a recommendation to the full common council. The full common council makes the final determination whether your license will be renewed, renewed with a suspension, or nonrenewed. Do you understand?
Can you say
that now?
Yeah. So you will receive a copy of the report of the findings of fact and inclusions of law. You'll have an opportunity to file written exceptions to that report, effectively objection. If you do file written exceptions, they must be received by the city clerk by May 6. If you submit written exceptions, you will also have the opportunity to appear before the Milwaukee Common Council when it considers this matter, your matter, on May 12 in the Common Council Chambers of City Hall.
And then please be further advised that this report is a recommendation to the full Common Council and the full Common Council makes the final determination whether your license will be renewed, renewed with the suspension or non renewed. Do you understand? Yeah. Okay. So you have you have the opportunity to object and then appear in front of the full body and do effectively the same thing and conclude your case. Okay.
All right. Thank you.
I object to the suspension not to the change of hours.
Correct. Correct.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. All right. We'll move on now to our 10:30AM agenda item. Jack Goldberg, agent for Alber Restaurant Group LLC, extended hours establishments, and food dealer licenses renewal application for Taco Bell number 31994 at 334 South 27th Street. Alright, good afternoon Alderman Scott Speicher and I see mister Goldberg is here with us virtually. Thank you for your patience. If you'll both raise your right hand, we'll get you sworn in.
The is only from under defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you ought to give is the true, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
I do. Yes. I do.
Thank you.
Thank you. Alright. Mister Goldberg, are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Yes. I am.
Alright. Thank you. Will you please state your name and address for the record?
My name is Jack Goldberg. I'm the chief financial officer for Albo Restaurant Group. I am currently sitting in our office at 485 East Half Day Road in Buffalo Grove, Illinois. If you're asking me for my personal address
Wherever you want us to mail the business so you receive it in a timely fashion.
Okay. The business address as given.
Alright. Do we wanna make him repeat that
or is that gonna ask?
Okay. Very good. Thank you, mister Goldberg. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds.
Okay. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
On 05/2725 at 12:25PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a subject with gun. The business call regarding a disorderly subject who may have who may have been armed with a firearm and pointing at a cashier due to the wait for their food. The subject was gone on officer's arrival. Officers were unable to view surveillance video due to access issues and were told to come back another day. On 07/2225 at 09:35PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to trouble subject. The business call, however, the subjects causing the disturbance were no longer on scene. At nine 06:25 at 03:31PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to shots fired. Investigation investigation revealed the shots fired was baseless. However, there was a subject on scene who was detained for disorderly behavior. The business was cooperative.
01/2426 at 04:16AM, Monkey Police were dispatched to WolferCheck. The business called regarding a citizen. However, they were no longer on scene.
Thank you. Mister Goldberg, would you like to speak to the police report?
I have no comment on that.
Does the committee have questions for Mr. Goldberg on the police report? Does Alderman Spiker have any questions on the police report?
Yes, madam chair. Please. Thank you. So for item 13, the agent and I had a conversation. So obviously if there's a possible subject with a gun, that's a very serious matter.
We want to make sure the officers are able to obtain video surveillance as quickly as possible, not told to come back another day when, you know, person involved may be long gone. So we had a conversation about what steps the business could take to make sure that access is provided to officers in a more timely manner. Could you just state what changes are being made and whether you've had the opportunity to contact District six, the community liaison officers, officers Ward and Garcia regarding this matter.
I think that's how you Mr. Wilbert?
I have not contacted anyone at this time. I apologize. From our communication, Alderman, we agreed that this was quite a serious issue. Unfortunately, sometimes we have difficulty getting communication on these issues from the store to our office. I am more administrative person being an accountant in the office, so I do try to help and facilitate these things.
I know that we've communicated over the last probably twelve to eighteen months on certain issues, Alderman, and I appreciate that communication very much because I take things I consider that I take things very seriously, especially certainly things like guns. And so if you reach out to me, that would always be addressed immediately, as we've seen from the last, again, six to twelve months. I can only say that our employees, as from the earlier police issues, have been compliant and helpful and done whatever they could do at the time. Haven't been able to because our our stores have incredibly high turnover rate in our, you know, for our employees. It's very difficult to go back to those people and find out what exactly happened that day and why they weren't able to access the cameras at that time.
But I'm certain that they wouldn't do it just to do it. In other words, there must have been a reason at that time. Subsequent to that, I don't know if the police came back. And I don't believe that the store employees did go further with that. Since you and I communicated on this and agreed that this was quite serious, I didn't know that there was additional work that needed to be done.
I thought it was more forward looking and that going forward, links might be provided that we can provide information when issues like this and or obviously less serious issues may occur. So that was my understanding. We certainly want to work with the neighborhood. We question. That's And so based on what I've been hearing for the last two hours listening, it seems like there's more and more issues that are occurring, whether in the neighborhood or nearby.
I'm less familiar with the neighborhood.
But I
will commit to you that we are doing what we can to protect our employees as well as to maintain a safe environment around our store. Again, we spoke
in Please wrap it up, Mr. Goldberger.
I'm sorry. I'm sorry.
I just that's a long yeah, it's a disappointing answer and a really long answer. But with that, I wanted to give it back to Alderman Spiker.
Yeah. So I realize you're an accountant with the business, but to be told that corporate has a hard time keeping track of what's going on in the store is hardly satisfying. So what I need is for you to become engaged. Make sure to send me an email and we set up a meeting with you, somebody who has more direct oversight over the store and can keep tabs on it. You apply for open records requests to see what's happening at your store if your employees aren't telling you directly and there is this evidence.com thing that you can upload video footage to but, again, you need to have the contact with the community liaison officers so they can take you through that.
So I'd like you to reach out to my office, send me an email, shoot me a call and so we can set up a meeting with myself, it can be virtual to just go over some of these details so you can make sure you're reporting this stuff. Because if this happens again next year then it's obviously a pattern not just a one time one off problem. But the means you've described to dealing with the the problem are not allaying anybody's fears, I fear, because not keeping tabs and not having contact with the police just means this problem could happen again.
Alderman Spiker, do you think that you want to hold this to ensure that that meeting happens or?
Yeah, that would be ideal.
All right. Alderman Andrea Pratt moves to hold this item to the call of the chair and hearing no objections so ordered. Mr. Goldberg, get those connect with Alderman Spiker's office and get those meetings calendared. We are going to hold this item.
What does that mean exactly by holding it, please?
We're not we're not moving forward with your application at this time. It's going be held so that I'll call the chair so that you can have the appropriate meetings with Alderman Spiker and other leaders in the community that he mentioned. I would suggest circling back with his office.
Does that mean that we're not able to operate our business?
No. You're still your license doesn't expire until June 2. So you are licensed right now. And if it starts to get close before you're up again, can always ask for a provisional license in the interim.
I see.
Okay. All the
work that we've done to this point, working with the city and with the neighborhood and with the alderman to get signs up because the neighbors aren't happy with the noise and the garbage along the fence that wasn't ours, we we said
We're not mister Goldberg, you're delay we're so behind and we're holding the item. I would I would save this dialogue for your alder and reach out to him offline. Okay.
I certainly will get the communication going. Thank you very much.
Alright. Thank you, mister Goldberg. We're going
to move on now to our
10:35AM agenda item and I I do want to let folks know it's my intention after the after the 10:55AM agenda item. Deanna E. Gonzales, I I do hope to take you break after the 10:55AM agenda for Diana E. Gonzales after that item. But just wanted to give folks a head up heads up who might be listening.
Alright. But with that, we'll move on to our 10:35AM agenda item. Luizano Donnie, agent for Prime Line Motors LLC, secondhand motor vehicle dealers license application for Primeline Motors at 4828 South 13th Street Number B 3. Is Luizano Tani present? Luizano Tano. Have have we heard from the applicant license division? Is it the first time on appearance? Yes. Alderman Spiker, you haven't heard? So, first time on appearance, Alderman Brower moves to hold.
Was that Brower? Alderman Bergalis moves to hold this item to the call of the chair and hearing no objections so ordered. We'll move on to our ten: 4zero am agenda item. Vipu Kumar Patel, agent for Sri Umiyakrupa, LLC, extended hours establishments, filling station, food dealer, and weight and measures licenses application requesting to open twenty four hours every day at is it am I mispronouncing? Is it US Smile or Usmil Airport Station at six 03:11 South thirteenth Street.
Is Vipukumar Patel present? Let me check outside. Vipukumar Patel, Sri Umiya Krupa LLC. I don't know if I'm saying that good, Alderman Spiker. I feel like you're better pronouncing the name. Fine. Okay. Alright. We're just checking outside to see if we're missing some folks. I know we were running behind this morning. Okay. What about Luizano Tanya? Is is he out there? No. Alright. Please come up, mister Patel. I know we're running a little bit behind. He broke his kids. Was out. Okay.
Madam chair, those those liquor license applicants get younger and younger every year. If
you'll raise your right hand, we'll get you sworn in.
Okay.
Do you solemn your family defensive penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Yes. Thank you. Thank you. And are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied? No. Okay. We cannot proceed if that's
the case.
Okay. Are
you on receipt of the notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied? Yeah. Okay. You sure? You wanna proceed?
Yeah. You can proceed. Yeah.
Okay. Alright. Please state your name and address for the record.
My name is Bipul Kumar Patel. Okay. My address, 1579 West Portview Drive, Apartment 202 Okay. Port Washington, ZIP code 53074.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
Hold for inspection.
Okay. And sergeant Covenajo, is there a police report?
There is no police reports.
Alright. I see it's a new application. Would you like to tell us a little bit about the business plan and your experience?
Okay. So, I have a one gas station in Port Washington and I'm just working the gas station at least six to seven years. And I have a gas station like two and a half years ago.
Okay.
And this is the second.
That you're gonna open?
Yeah.
Alright. Questions from committee members for the applicant at this time?
I took care of all of them.
Right. Questions from Alderman Spiker for the applicant at this time.
So if you live in Port Washington, who would be to day management of the business?
Are you I just managed on the Port Washington gas station like 223 West Grand Avenue?
Yes. But who would be managing the day to day of this gas station on 13th Street if you live in Port Washington?
Now I live on the mill sorry. Live on the Port Washington.
You live in Port Washington? Yes.
So who would be managing the store on a day to day basis if you live in Port Washington?
For the like of
Who would be at so I go to the gas station, who's going to be there? You? Somebody else?
No. No. I have three to four employees.
So you would not be managing able to They're not
sure that there's a robust
to plan to make sure management that. Is on point here and I'm I'm not hearing clarity in that regard.
Let me can I help you? Try to help mister Alderman Spiker? He wants to know, are you going to be at this location? When how often are you going to be at this new store in his in Milwaukee?
New store?
How often are you going to be here if you have another gas station in Port Washington?
Okay. So, when you when you approve the license, then you open the store, then I make a decision make like a how to like a I have a more employee. My wife also working. My son also working there.
Okay. But you won't be
They're gonna run it. You're not gonna be on-site? You're not gonna be there at the store? You?
For, like, 6311? Yeah. 223 West Grand Avenue.
Yes. For 6311.
6311. Yes. So I have a plan to run on this tour.
I think there's a language barrier.
I'm apologize.
Are are you struggling? Is there are you struggling understanding what we're asking?
Do we understand?
Okay.
You know, you
should bring somebody with you to help. You can always bring somebody to help you to to interpret for you.
Yes. I apologize, but my brother not come with you, come with me.
Okay.
So I don't know. He's at home. He's busy on some can he anyway. So I come here.
Yeah. I think there's a bit of a language barrier, Alderman Spiker. Do you wanna to hold. Yes. I think because we wanna make sure we hear understand each other I can tell there's a language barrier. We're gonna hold this item. And perhaps should he reach out to you, Alderman Spiker, and we'll just
Yeah. We'll have to
Get a
translator here for next time. Yes. If there's anything on
So that we can understand each other. We're gonna have to hold this item.
So can I can I call my brother and come here?
It really
It's like I don't know. Is my brother also on the online at home also? He's busy on some different way.
Maybe we could Alderman Speicher, do you want are you gonna be here for the day or are you willing to come? I should probably not.
I guess I'd like to get clarity from the applicants about I mean, I can go after this next item, if he hangs around, I can go with him in the hall and get clarity on who's gonna run the place.
Yeah. Alright. If you wanna is he gonna come in person or is he gonna get on he can come online.
I call him if he want.
Yeah. Not but we're going to we're going to hold it right now but yes, why don't you try to get a hold of him?
Okay.
Alright. Elder woman Pratt moves to hold this item to the call of the chair and hearing no objections so ordered. Alright. Thank you. Uh-huh. And then I will pass the gavel now to elder woman Pratt for the items in my district. So,
next up on our 10:45AM agenda, we have Mia g is that Mia? No. Ma. Ma g Cabral Villarreal, agent for El Pauricio Restaurant Bar LLC, food dealer and food peddler license renewal application for El Parisio at 2131 South Muskego Avenue. Is Majdi Cabral Vigaril present?
Thank you.
K. Please raise your right hand. Uh-huh. Please raise your right hand to be sworn in. If you plan on testifying also. Yeah.
Do you solely
Are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied?
We received the letter letting us know about the meeting.
Okay. Please state your name and address for the record.
Okay. The address is 909 South 9th Street, and her name is she said it. Did
you also state your imminent your address, name
address?
Thank
you. Miss Lopez, are there any holes? No holes. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
There are no police reports.
Okay.
Is this new? There's a charge.
Oh, no. First renewal. Okay. Yes. Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify?
Let the record reflect that there are no neighbors present who wish to testify. So I want her to tell us about the business or something or you want
her to okay.
I can
provide some Okay.
I mean,
this is the 8th Automatic District.
Okay. Thank you, madam chair. This is a unique case and I I did ask Alderman Spiker if he would stay for this item. The objection, we do we do have an objection on file and I was hoping to get if Alderman Spiker would give us some context although the business is in my district. There were some issues that the applicant engaged in in Alderman Spiker's district. So if we could give it to Alderman Spiker. Thank
you, Madam Chair. Yeah, I just got this objection today, but it concerns 3303 South 16th Street, which is in my district. There's been a food truck that's been parked out there. There's a trailer behind it. I looked through the land management system.
It had orders because it wasn't moving. So I just contacted parking today when I learned that's still an issue. Inside the building there was occupancy I think in January 2025 for an office type of use. I just called once I got this objection today the woman who took out that occupancy she's no longer leasing the building so apparently somebody connected to the food truck is and they have tables in there and they appear to be serving but I don't believe there's any occupancy to do that. The objection stated something about serving alcohol as well and an employee who was underage that that was in the objection.
So something is going on in that building that doesn't look to be kosher given what occupancy is allowed. So I'm having folks investigate it now, but again, I just got this objection today.
Okay. Thank you. Do you want me to go back to or to the president?
I do. Well, I do want to have. Madam chair, I did want to I would like the applicants to speak to what Alderman Spiker has laid out as well. I mean, it is in the file as well. What is going on at 3303 South 16th Street.
So since I'm sorry. She's saying that they do not sell any alcohol there, that they have a sign that they sell with no alcohol. She's also expressing that the minor that is there is her granddaughter who's already 14. 14 and she comes sometimes just to help out so she can gain some experience but absolutely no alcohol is is held there.
Madam chair.
Attorney Gresham.
If I might, I think there was also questions that were posed or at least addressed about occupancy or the use of that building. If we could make sure that that was translated and then we responded to.
They are they do not have an occupancy permit for the building. They do not use the building. It's only that food truck parked outside outside of of the the building. Building.
Might I ask what the tables are in there for then?
the microphone.
There are tables, but they don't use them. So the plan is to open the building in the future. That's why slowly they have things there and they do have tables, but that is in the future.
Madam chair.
Hello, persons. I'm Maribel.
Hi. You sell Micheladas. Micheladas are it's a beer drink. Is there beer in your Micheladas?
The beer that they use to make these Michiladas is the Heineken zero zero, so it's a nonalcoholic beer. Or mineral
water. Alright. I'm I'm sorry to the committee but I I was unaware that Alderman Spiker got such a late notification on this and he we did talk offline about the desire to have DNS here to weigh in and I I do think that it's appropriate given I mean, we have you're denying the allegations outright. None of this happened in your opinion. You're telling me nothing happened here?
They are denying. I that I have great concern here and madam chair, I would like to move to hold so that we can get some of the city departments at the table.
Okay. And and madam chair.
At Army Spanks.
So really for briefing. Okay. So, you will need to move that food truck. You can't park a food truck and park in front of a building forever. You need to move that trailer. None of that can be there. So that all needs to go away. Parking is coming. I've called them.
Okay. So She wants she's asking moving the food truck at night or where
The license division can
tell you the rules.
Can they have it there during the day and then move it at night and come back every morning?
No. You have to move it more frequently than that. I saw division can tell you how frequently
you have.
Okay. Okay. So the motion by persons and repul you was to hold to call a chair. Thanks. Oh, Alderman Burgales. I'm sorry. No. It's alright. Thank you,
madam chair. The license is currently expired licensing division?
That's correct.
So you know you so you know that you are, unable to operate? Your license expired March.
They do have a provisional.
Oh, they have a they do have a provisional.
Yeah. Was issued March 19. It expires May 16.
It expires May 18. Expires May 18. Thank you, madam chair.
Okay.
And chair. Auto parking. And if it becomes an issue, I'm happy to continue to support a provisional if Yes. But wanted to just convey to them. I just gave the applicant my business card if they can please reach out to my office.
Motion by order. Person Zammaripa is to hold. Hearing and saying no objection, so order.
Thank you. And we are going to recess, sir. Yes.
And we are going to recess. We will see you shortly.
Yes. 01:25. We'll be back. Thank you, Alderman Spiker. Thank you. Thank you. Gracias.
And Oh, yeah. Motion by order person Zama Ripa is to Reconsider. Reconsider item Two The 10:40AM agenda item.
Outside knows that we're Oh.
Didn't matter.
So that everybody outside knows that.
Alright. We're back. We're back in session.
So, next up on our 10:40AM agenda. You said this name so well though. Oh, yeah. The Pukumar Patel, agent for Sri Umi Umi Rupa LLC. Extended hours, established filling establishments, filling station, food dealer, and weights and measures license application requesting to open twenty four hours every day from You Smile Airport Station at 6311 South 13th Street is the Pokhma the Pokhma Kumar Patel present.
Just let mister Patel is
Do we
have to slur him in everything again? Yes. Or no? Okay. Please raise your is your brother also
Yes. Yes. We left
the room the hearing effectively adjourned or not adjourned, but
it's Okay.
Your brother is is he on the board? Okay. So just please raise your right hand to be sworn in. You as well, mister Patel. Please raise your right hand to be sworn in.
Thank you, too. You saw only a felon in the events and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Yes, I do.
Make a
brief confirmation for mister Purcell online.
Mister Purcell, we need you to say, were you sworn in?
It's his first name.
Mister Jay Patel?
He's raising his hand.
Yeah, But can you unmute yourself? Oh, he's saying thumbs up.
Yeah. Can you give us
a vocal confirmation that you were sworn in?
He's he's also acting as translator. Right?
So Yeah. So you'll have to unmute yourself because you're translating for your brother.
Oh, yeah. Okay.
Okay.
Was that him saying he
was sworn in? Were you sworn in, mister Patel?
Man, I just want in. Yeah. Okay.
Thank you. Are you a receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied?
Thank you. Can I?
Can we have confirmation? Can can you translate that for your brother and then have him confirm?
Yes. Vipulbai, it is, it is, a thing. It may the license may decline in the today's hearing. You have to confirm. Can you say yes? Okay.
Yes. Okay.
Okay.
Thank you. Please state your name and address for the record.
Bipur Kumar p Patel. Address 1579 West Portview Drive, Apartment 242 Port Washington, ZIP code 53074.
Okay. And mister Patel, can you also Jay Patel Yes. State your name and address?
Yeah. Jagdish Kumar Patel, 5096 West Berkshire Drive, Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132.
Thank you. Ms. Lopez, are there any holds?
A hold for occupancy and inspection.
Thank you. Sergeant Cornell, is there a police report?
There are no police reports.
Okay. Is this a new business? Yes. Okay. So this is a new business. Can you tell us about Or do we do we already do this? Tell us about your plan and your experience for the business. So mister, Doctor. Kumar, can you please
Yes, ma'am. Yeah. Thank you. Basically, I
plan and experience.
Okay. Okay. You can can you you you
you can can which is who is managing this business in the day to day. So if we want to go straight to that question, let's go straight to that question.
Who mister Patel, who is managing the business day to day?
Mister Patel.
You. Okay. So then he is the person who is going to have to answer then. Right? That what you're saying?
These are questions that were posed by Alderman Spiker. Mhmm. If Alderman Spiker wants to pose them and then have them translated and get the response.
Okay.
Think that would be sufficient here.
Okay.
Alright. So we, I guess we'll go. Spiker. Yeah. So he's talking about his plan and experience. Do you have any questions for the applicant? Can.
Yes. So who will be at the business on a daily basis tending to customers?
On a a regular daily shift, it will be mostly Mukul Kumar Patel or the assigned manager on the on the on the premise. In nighttime, I will be the mostly responsible for handling any any security concerns or anything at the station, but we we will be having a manager on-site too.
So mister your brother lives in Port Washington, so how is he going to be there during the day when he has a stake in Port Washington?
He's been he's been everyday communicating from Port Washington to Milwaukee for purchasing the merchandise and stuff. And now he has a couple of new manager that he's gonna hire at the Port Washington location so that he can fully focus here on South Side, which is 13th and a college.
one the people we who are lot is
Mr. Aurora?
I need his testimony sir.
Okay okay okay sorry. Vipabai can you ask this question can you answer this question?
There's no translation. Yeah.
Transfer.
I just met, like, two one times. One or two one times.
That's false. I had a meeting with you where mister Patel was or mister Aurora was present, and he indicated he knew you, that you had a relationship, and you had that's not true. I mean, we were in a meeting where he was physically there. My concerns I guess to the committee relate to Mr. Aurora had an issue where he was hiring staff for a hotel, was never present.
I'm concerned about something like that repeating repeating here given the applicant's ownership of the store in Port Washington. I have concerns about whether this store would be staffed adequately. There is also an abandoned hotel next door that is under contract in May. I would like to see how that shakes out before I would approve or solicit the approval of a gas station here at all because if a hotel comes in versus residential that completely changes the tenor of the neighborhood. So I wouldn't be in support of this license let alone an extended license at this point with this applicant at this time.
Mr. Patel, can you translate that for your brother?
Yes. Mr. Ugulbai Mhmm. So the they are basically, they are saying that since Mr. Arora, Harnip Arora, the property owner has, like, little different way of running business owner, Ardip Arora is just a a landlord. And currently, we are dealing with the with the next door motor, which is property which is also against not in our control to answer. So can you please answer in a way that why We have to be able to
Okay.
So this this station, take a lease so I can do on myself.
Okay. You're saying you don't have a partner? Is that what you're saying? Okay.
No partners.
Okay. Thank you. Do you have any questions from committee?
Do you
have any questions, Alderman Spiker? No. Madam Chair? Auditor President Amaripa.
I just so Alderman Spiker Oh, I didn't ask for our neighbors. I just wanted to for your last counts, so right are you looking for, a hold to have more communication? Is that what you were talking about? Or
No. I mean, I wouldn't be in favor of of the approval at this time for this these licenses. I wanna see what happens with the hotel, but also I do not believe the applicant that he has no contact with or relationship with mister Aurora. And mister Aurora set up a pattern of neglectful management which I am concerned about would be present here as well given the answers that I've heard from the applicant.
Thank you. You, madam. Thank you.
Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify? Let the record reflect that there are no neighbors present who wish to testify.
you want to give his recommendation?
He did.
Yeah. He did. Okay. So we are in committee. I wish I gave him a closing.
Okay. But should we let the applicant give closing?
Absolutely.
Okay. You can give closing remarks. Mister Jake Patel, you can let your brother know if he wants to give closing remarks that you can translate. Yes.
I can I can translate to him? Can you give me the closing remarks?
Let him know that he can make a closing statement now.
Okay.
I know for the Hardeep Aurora. Okay. So I just meet them and make a deal with Hardeep Aurora and everything I'm heavy. And I have a knowledge to get station and everything, so I can do on myself. So not nothing to
Madam chair. Thank you. All of our time, Marico. Do you wanna speak in your language and your brother can translate? Are you more comfortable telling us in your language?
Okay.
So and I
have a
knowledge. So I don't have any concern to say something. So Okay. I'm ready to
Okay. Yeah.
So my his his closing statement is he feel very, very confident on himself because he also dealt with other landlord in our past, and he had run successful business. He's running one in Port Washington, absolutely very profitable and a community business. So he's confident that he can run it, and he's asking and requesting you guys to give him a a chance to operate this station. At least the closed property will be will not become abandoned, and it will have a nice use since he's waiting from last six months to open this station.
Thank you. Thank you. Okay. We are in committee. Does the committee have a motion?
What do you think, Peter?
Madam chair. Thank you. It's a new application. Correct? Yes. Alright. Alright. Thank you very much for your time and testimony. I'm glad mister Patel, your brother, could join you to help with translation but based on the dialogue we've had here today and input from the local elder, I will move for denial at this time.
The motion by Alderperson Zamarepa is denial. Any objections to that motion? Hearing and seeing none, so ordered. Thank you. So it did not pass.
I don't know if you Can you mister Patel, can you tell your brother that the application unfortunately was denied at this time?
Yes. Let me tell you. So, basically, the city of Milwaukee is saying that your license, is going to be denied because, the landlord does not have, prior business Tell him.
Good experience.
You're speaking in English, mister Patel. Can you tell him in his in your language? Can you let him know so he understands?
Yeah. Yeah. I'm telling him in my language, and he can understand since he is on a official city record. I wanna make sure that I'm giving a, you know, a closing statement exactly what you said to me. So I'm telling him in my language that he he's denying denying this license with the fact that
he Mister Patel, there was
mister Patel, before before you get into a reason why, there was no reason given for the motion to deny. It was simple a denial. That was it.
That's the motion
motion by committee was denial. That denial was not objected to. We're we're the the matter is concluded. We can move on. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. Alright. Next. Thank you. Next up in our 11:05AM agenda. So, you're you're done. You can go. Next up in our 11:05AM agenda, we have Omar Mendoza Coto, agent for a bar entree copas LLC Class B Tavern and Public Entertainment Permits License Application requesting instrumental musicians, disc jockey, karaoke, and patrons dancing for a bar
Madame Chair,
I think we need 10:55.
Oh, did I skip 10:55?
Yes. Oh. Yes. Yes. Oh. We did 10:45.
Oh, okay.
That's right. You're the chair.
You you pick up next.
I'm 10:50
No. I'm falling.
My apologies. Next up on our 10:55AM agenda, we have Diana e Gonzales, agent for Machio's Place LLC Class B Tavern and Public Entertainment Premise License Application requesting jukebox, three amusement machines, and two pool tables for Machia's Place at 2000 West Mitchell Street. Is Diana e Gonzales present? Yes. Please raise your right hand to be sworn in.
Do you solely inform on the defense and penalties of perjury of state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and a family the truth?
Yes. Thank you.
Are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied? Yes. Please state your name
and address for the record. Diana e Gonzales. 2423 South 11th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53215.
Thank you. Miss Lopez, are there any holds? Hold for occupancy. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
There are no police reports. Okay.
This is a new application, a new business. Could you tell us about your experience and your plan for the business?
I did work at a bar before. My mom used to have a business. She did pass away trying to open for my own self to open a business. I worked with her. She's had two business before back in in the past. So I'm just trying to open a business for myself.
Okay. Are
there any questions from committee about planned experience? Thank you. Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify? Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present who wish to testify. This is in the 8th Automatic District, Otter Persons Amariba.
Yes. Thank you. I have appreciate Diana's communication with my office. She let us know about her time working with her mom in her business and excited to invite welcome this woman owned bar back on the Mitchell Street. The historically the previous applicant definitely was a bad actor but I have determined after talking to her at length, she's not connected at all to the prior applicant and so I'm happy to support her application today. I'd like to move for approval, madam chair.
Okay. Motion by persons Amaripa is approval. Any objections to that motion? Hearing and seeing us. So ordered. Thank you and good luck.
Thank you.
Now, next up on on 11:05AM agenda, we have Omar Mendoza Coto, agent for Bar Entre Copas LLC, class b tavern and public entertainment premise license application requesting instrumental musicians, ditch jockey, karaoke, and patrons dancing for barre entree copas at 1226 West National Avenue. Is Omar Mendoza Cotto present? Omar Mendoza Mendoza Cotto. Licensing, have you heard from this applicant?
No, madam chair.
Other persons at Maripa, have you heard from this applicant?
No. Not recently. I assumed they would be here today. Is this the first time in appearance, manager?
You wanna hold?
Alright. I move to hold, manager.
Motion by the person's name repas to hold. Hearing say no objection. So ordered. Next up on our 1PM agenda, we have Mauricio Del Morale Aguilar, agent for Don Pastor LLC, food dealer and food peddler license renewal application as agent for Don Pastor at 520 East Center Street. Is Mauricio Del Moran Aguilar present?
On the board.
He's on the board. Okay.
Yes. Yeah.
You're there. Please raise your right hand to be sworn in.
Do you solemnly affirm on the depends on the penalties of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and the proof of the truth?
Thank you.
Are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied? Yes. Please state your name and address for the record.
Mauricio Del Moral. 1223 South Fulton Avenue, Okegan, Illinois. 635.
Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
Just been a while.
I'm say to you. Alright. Why are think I'm gonna search
for hold on. I'm sorry.
Oh. No holds.
Okay. Sergeant Quinnejo, is there a police report?
62524 in Racine County. The agent was charged and found guilty of OWI and VAC. Sentenced one year votes for OWI and six month suspension for the VAC.
Thank you. I'm sorry. This is also in the 6th Automatic District. We have Glenda Otis McMiller on the board. Can you please raise your right hand to be sworn in? My apologies.
mean, Glenda's up on the board. Mhmm.
I'm here. I can't hear you. I'm trying to turn my camera on.
Oh, you I said you to to be sworn in.
Okay. But my hand is up. Okay. My camera's not looking, but my hand is up. Do
you solemnly affirm on the defensive priorities of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Agree. Thank you.
Thank you. You did speak to the would that you said the police report. Would the applicant like to speak to the items on the police report? He was in there. Mr. Del Morado. Mister DeMaro Aguilar? Okay. Did you wanna speak to the items on the police report? Did you hear them read it?
You have to unmute yourself.
Oh, I said no. It's okay. I'm sorry.
Okay. Thank you. Does the committee have any questions about police report?
Madam chair.
On reverse of that request.
I mean, it is unusual to not speak to the police report, sir. You don't wanna offer any remarks? This is your
this is your
level. It's it's it's it's just I'm sorry. My English is not too good. It's it's it's just that I really learned my my my lesson.
I did
my assessment. I did everything, And I did my my classes. And and it's very important to have my my my license because I have a family to support and and I would like I I've been doing that for five years and and I would really like an opportune another opportunity.
Thank you. Thank you, madam chair. Thank you.
Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify? Let the record reflect that there are no neighbors present who wish to testify. This is in the 6th Automatic District, Glenda.
Okay. So the Alderman woman will approve with a warning letter.
Thank you.
Move approval with a warning letter.
Motion by member Gellis is approval with a warning letter. Hearing seen no objections, so ordered. Thank you. Good luck. Next up on our 01:05PM agenda, we have Basim Ramadan, agent for A and R Foods LLC, food dealer license renewal application for A and R Foods at 400 East Berlin Street. Is Bassam Ramadan present?
How are you doing?
I'm doing well. How are you?
I'm too blessed to be stressed. Please
raise your right hand to be sworn in.
Do you solemnly affirm on the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
I do.
Thank you, sir.
And please state your appearance, attorney Maiselman.
Attorney Mike Maiselman on behalf of
Thank you. On your receipt of notes of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied.
Absolutely. Please
state your name and address for the record.
My name is Bassam Ramadan. My address is 3554 South Avenue, Apartment 7, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53207.
Miss Lopez, are there any holes? No holes. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
Ten four twenty five Milwaukee Police were assigned to work with Wisconsin Winds, which checks area vendors for age compliant tobacco sales. At approximately 11:30AM, a youth entered 400 East Burleson and was able to purchase a tobacco product from the cashier who did not check ID. The agent was cited for the sale of cigarette to a minor and was found guilty and paid a forfeiture.
Would the applicant like to speak to the items on the police report?
May I?
Yes. You paid me.
I'm sorry.
Go ahead.
No. No.
No. No. No. Okay. So so obviously that did happen. We are obtaining a ID scanner going forward. We are talking to all of our staff to make sure that they are trained properly or are gonna be trained on the scanner also. And they have it's a a one strike. If they if they screw up again, they're fired. And the person who did sell that took the class. What was?
Mohammed.
Yeah. The and the But
but but
the person pivot? Which class did you cover, I think?
For the Wisconsin wins and the the the tobacco didn't for the whole thing. Yeah. Yeah. Attend the class for that and we eat best and we know. Okay.
And the only other one of the sales was, I believe, in 2018.
Yeah. That was I wasn't here. I wasn't at the I was overseas attending my dying father. Mhmm. So whoever stayed in there, you know, was came all of a sudden.
Mhmm.
And he doesn't
know. Okay. Alright.
It didn't happen till this past
October. Okay.
Does the committee have any questions about the police report? Madam chair. Autumn Burgales.
Thank you. Was there any disciplinary action in the past for the 2018 violation?
In 2018, nothing. They got a warning letter in 2021 and a warning letter in 2024.
That's a pretty good track record.
Consistent track record of problems.
A warning letters. Thank you. Thank you, madam chair.
Glenda, do you have any oh, you're welcome. Glenda, do have any questions about police report?
I just I I just have a couple questions. One, I didn't clearly hear what he said. His policy is now before the violator would be fired. I heard he said staff will be fired. Would that be on the initial or a sub or a second violation?
Initial.
Okay. Okay. And then looking back at past things at one time, they said they were gonna get a surveillance camera and then I see later on in 2024, they had a a surveillance camera. Is this the same camera they had promised to get initially?
Yeah. I'm sorry. How did you get that?
That that you said in the past that you were gonna get a surveillance camera?
Yeah.
And the alderman's office said that you have a surveillance camera
Yeah.
And asked you if it's the same one.
We have this. We have surveillance camera inside and outside. We're trying to upgrade the one outside based on the police request here. Okay.
Okay. Are there any neighbors present? Oh, I'm sorry, Glenda. Were you done?
I was
going to close my voice.
Okay. Thank you. Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify? Alright, miss Josephine. Please raise your right hand to be sworn in.
The assembly of from under the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, whole truth, and the human truth?
Yes, ma'am.
Thank you.
I'm just gonna state your name and address for the record, and then you'll be given two and a
half minutes to speak.
Alright. My name is Josephine.
Can you speak to the microphone? Thank you.
My name is Josephine. Last name is Key, k e y, and address is 3146 North Buffum Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212.
And then you can start your testimony.
Okay. I'm here. I've been coming to support them for some years now. I've lived on Buffum Street for over fifty years. And I met them when they opened up the store, and they try everything. They even called me because they've called the police. The police did not respond. I don't have any clout with the police. I could promise you that. They don't respond.
The kids blocked the intersection intersection between East Bow East Burleigh and Buffum Street, and they think it's a party. I have people that come to see me. They can't get through, so they leave. That's and they are not allowed in the store. I've I've seen this, you know, because the kids come in the store, I believe they steal.
I believe they do a lot of things they should not be doing because number one, they're underage and they should be in school. Okay? And my thought is, and I want you guys to know, they're trying. Health issues this year for me, so I used to just go do surprises. Can't do that. Not what can you know? And they're trying, and that's all we can do in this world is try. And, you know, I support them. I people fill up the garbage. You know?
That money has to come from them. It's like a bad two way street in all honesty. And so I hope you guys don't deny them. I have no control over that either, but I support them. That is why I'm here because the big word for me today is try. And, I mean, I can't ask anymore and neither can they. So Okay. Thank you, miss Josephine.
Does the committee have any questions for this witness? Does this auto auto woman in contact any questions for this witness? Applicant, any questions for this witness? No. Alright.
I do just wanna thank miss Key for coming up. Yeah.
I I would too then.
Yes. We all do. Alright. So this is in the 6th Automatic District.
I can
give you a opportunity to do a closing after this. Okay. In the 6th Automatic District, Otto Woman Cox.
In this neighborhood, we we often do neighborhood walks and support the the back to school book bag giveaway and things of that nature, all of which, are led, by miss Key and her family. I I it weighs very heavily with me, that she is understanding and seize the effort and work of the store owners to at least try to improve. I do know that the loitering is an issue, and I'm committed to help you work with the neighborhood of MPD to try to eradicate that issue. I think it's important just to help stabilize things over there, but I would just I have no objections to them getting rid of
Did you want to do closing remarks? Sometimes Yeah. Things are left better on set. We are in committee. Does the committee have a motion?
Autumn in Jackson.
I move approval with a one letter to stay consistent with our Okay. Wisconsin winds
Yeah. Check. Motion by Alderman Jackson is approval with a warning letter. Hearing and seeing no objections, self order. Thank you. Good luck. Next up on our what are where are we? 01:10. Next up on our 01:10PM agenda. We have Jitender K.
I skipped another one. Now I swear when we come back. Okay. Next up on our 01:10PM agenda, we have Jitender K Mann, agent for Mann Family LLC, class a fermented malt and food dealer license renewal application for Palmer Center Foods at 200 East Center Street. Is Jatinder Kay Mann present?
Yes. Okay. Please raise your right hand to be sworn in. You as well. Otto Woman Cox. Thank you.
Oh, she's Oh.
Thank you.
The use only from an independent plaintiff's superior of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and of him of the truth? Yes. I do. Thank you.
Attorney Michael Maesteman on behalf of miss Mann.
Thank you. Are you a receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied?
She is.
Thank you. Please state your name and address for the record.
Jitender Gorman. Home address 6310 Sycamore Street, Greendale, Wisconsin 53129 is my ZIP code.
Okay. Thank you. Miss Lopez, are there any holds? No holds. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
At 09:26 twenty five at 04:13PM, Walker Police were dispatched to a troubled subject. The business was a caller regarding call caller regarding a subject panhandling in front of the store. The subject was longer no longer on scene. At 09:30 twenty five at 02:17PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a troubled subject. The subject causing the disturbance was no longer at scene.
Police services were no longer required. On 10/02/2025 at 08:44PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to trouble the subject. The business was a caller and request information regarding a restrained order for repeat of cut lawyers. On 10/04/2025, multi police were assigned to work with Wisconsin Winds, which checks area vendors for age compliant tobacco sales. At possibly 10:48AM, a youth, not a legal not a legal age to purchase tobacco, entered the business and purchased tobacco product from the cashier who did not check for ID.
The employee did not did not deny the sale. Excitation of sale cigarette to minor was issued to the agents. On 04/1526, they were convicted and fined $345. On 02/1526 at 07:34PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a call for police. The subjects causing the disturbance were no longer on scene and police services were no longer required.
Would the advocate like to speak to the items on the police report?
Yes. The the one really, the one that bothers me, know bothers you all, is the underage sale. Because of that, my client will be now getting an ID scanner to check every ID. And, the one strike policy, we went over that if any of their employees do anything wrong, whether it's not calling the police when they should, not cooperating with the police when they should, or selling to an underage person, they will lose their job immediately. And I I submitted a a mitigation plan maybe a half an hour ago to address these concerns.
I can read them to you. But it's like, you know, it goes over to how many cameras they have. Okay. We'll be meeting with MPD to go over everything and I would defer to the alderwoman if she is.
Madam
chair. I send that mitigation plan by Email a few minutes
minutes ago. Ago. Okay. Okay. Thank you. So does the committee have any questions about the police report? No. Okay. Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify? Okay. But the record reflect there are no neighbors present who wish to testify. This
in the 6th Automatic District, Alderman Cox.
Thank you, madam chair. You know, the self underage does disturb me. I think it's good that they do have a a mitigation plan. I would like the plan to become a part of the record Okay. If possible.
So alderman Bergelis moves to add the mitigation plan to the plan of operation. Hearing to no objections are ordered.
Although no neighbors came here today, I have had town hall meetings within the last year where residents
who live
near to this location did express some concerns. So what I would just ask is for the applicant to speak with neighbors, hear their concerns, and throughout the year, be willing to make adjustments so that we don't have a whole lot of neighbors here next time. And with that, I have no objection to a renewal with a warning letter. Okay.
Thank you. Did you
want to I have nothing further Again. To
We are in committee.
Madam Chair.
Auderman Brower.
Move to approve of the warning letter.
Motion to honor Brower is approval with the warning letter.
Feel there's I'm
sure you see no objections. So ordered. Thank you. Good luck.
Thank you so much. Mhmm.
Next up on our 01:15PM agenda I agenda, we have Richard Blunt, agent for Milwaukee DD Lodging Investors LLC Class B Tavern Public Entertainment Premises, Hotel slash Motel, Food Dealer and Sidewalk Licenses Renewal Application for The Trade Milwaukee at 420 West Juno Avenue. Is Richard Lunt present?
I am.
I am everybody. Please raise your right hands to be sworn in.
Do you solemnly hear
from an independent of the verdict of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and of your mother truth? Yep. Thank you.
Are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied?
I am.
Please state your name and address for the record and anyone who plans on testifying as well.
Certainly. Richard Lent. 1931 North Cora Drive, Grafton, Wisconsin 53024.
Chris Pallad, 2100 Carrington Drive, Brookfield, Wisconsin 53045.
And counsel for the applicants, Thomas Claussen, Reinhart Berner, Enduren, Thousand North Water Street.
Thank you. Miss Lopez, are there any holds? No holds. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
On 10/1324 at 09:05PM, officers were dispatched to a trouble of subject complaints. The caller stated the subject became belligerent with staff, but they left prior to officer's arrival. No additional per police services were needed. On 11/1024 at 09:04PM, an officer was dispatched to a troubled subject complaints. The manager called regarding a subject causing a disturbance with employees in the restaurant after they were refused additional services.
A security guard stood by with the subject and was cooperative during the investigation. On 02/1525 at 05:53AM, officers were dispatched to a theft complaint. The car was a guest at the hotel requested officers retrieve their cell phone from a known subject who took it after a disagreement. Employees assisted officers during the investigation. On 04/1325 at 04:53PM, officers were dispatched to a vehicle theft complaints.
Investigation revealed the caller's car was illegally towed off the public street by a private contractor on request of employees. The com the tow company was not cooperative and refused officer's request to release the vehicle. The valet service and hotel employees refused to call the private tow company and have the caller's vehicle released, which resulted in the caller not being able to retrieve their vehicle. On 04/2825 at 06:40AM, an officer observed multiple valet signs posted on the roadway in front of the business causing a traffic hazard. The manager was advised the signs had to be removed from the roadway. The manager stated a contractor valet service placed the signs there but they will be informing the contractor of the issues.
Would the applicant like to speak to the items on the police report?
Certainly. I'll start at the back and work toward the front. The the the two parking ones we use a third party valet company. They did make a mistake in having the car towed and we've certainly coached them not to do that anymore. We did have a solution to this problem.
All the road cogs helped us get a loading zone in front of the hotel and then meters installed. The problem stemmed from a potential of bus arrivals with high profile clients if you will and there was no restriction on cars parking right in front of the hotel but so by adding meters and a loading zone, we're able to mitigate that as well as making sure that people can get in and out of the hotel. On the 10:13, somebody came in off the street. We that was belligerent. We contacted MPD.
Again, they left on 11:10. We we had somebody who was not a guest of the hotel that came in who were already intoxicated. They refused service and wouldn't leave and so again, we contacted MPD for that one as well. And then we did have a situation where we had two guests who got in an argument over a phone and again, we had to contact MPD for that one as well. Okay.
Does the committee have any questions about the police report?
Madam chair.
Alderman Bergales.
How's a private tow company able to tow off the street in a loading zone?
I I think what it was was the valet company as I understand it. There was a car there for five hours. It was just on that side of the street. It was just open parking. There's no meters, anything and we had a a team bus arrival and they wanted to get the bus parked in front of the hotel and so I think from what I heard the valet company went everywhere they could find out whose car it was so we could get the bus arrival when they couldn't find the person.
They called the private tow company without the hotel without us being aware and had it towed. We've asked the we asked the valet company to make it right with the customer. I the communication between the valet company and the tow company, yeah, I guess I'm not exactly sure how they're able to do but they made that phone call.
I'm well, tow companies are licensed nonconsensual tow companies are licensed by this committee. I'd like to know who it was.
We can certainly find that.
I have it here.
And so the I'm sorry. So the car was parked in the loading zone?
It it at there was initially for the first couple years, the entire front of the trade hotel did not have meters, did not have Mhmm. We're just open and anybody could park their open parking.
So how so under what authority was the car towed?
It's a it says on the report here that the car was parked between two signs which read temporary tow away zone except Saturday and Sunday. The incident did happen on a Sunday but the tow company looked at the tow way signs and towed the vehicle without the hotel's approval.
But with your vendor's approval? Yes. Correct. Right.
Okay.
Thank you, madam.
Madam Chair. Owner versus Ameripa.
Yeah, I'm sorry. That's this is pretty egregious. It doesn't and it wasn't just the tow company or the valley service. It says your hotel employees refused to call the tow company. So it sounds like your own team was equally just as egregious. I mean, did you how did you compensate this constituent? Did they have to pay cost to have their car released? Mean, what what details can you offer us to know that you satisfactorily remedy the remedy the situation for the constituent?
Again, my my understanding was that the that the the policy is now changed. They've instructed the third party contractor. This is no longer acceptable. Also work with the other woman's office to ensure that those permanent loading zone signs were put in place as long along with the the parking meters. One of the concerns obviously with having the buses come in and having to park if there was a park a parked car there was that they'd actually be in the middle of the traffic on Geno Avenue and causing more of a safety issue.
So again, thanks to all that woman Cox's office for working collaboratively to figure out a solution, you know, proactively moving forward. In terms of you know, what what happened previously, again, absolutely a mistake. The my understanding is that the third party vendor has been instructed that that is obviously no longer acceptable and employees have been, you know, trained that if this situation were to occur, which it seems like it won't because of the new mode design provisions that the that that they cooperate with folks moving forward and you guys can chime in if you have anything.
Okay. Because I do wanna know, attorney, you're the only one who said the employees were talked to as well. Otherwise, up until now, it's been, oh, it was a third party contractor and we're not they've been are you working with the same third party contractor?
Yes. Yeah. They it's the same company that does most of the downtown hotels. I I don't believe our employees were involved that I'm aware of.
I'm sorry. Must have missed
both of these.
But it
says it's here. Hotel employees.
I I I thought I.
At the request of the employee, I read that as the valet. I can double check but I read that as the request of valet company because they they handle all the luggage delivery for the buses and I think they were in a bit of a panic. Wanted to get the bus in for these folks and didn't want to have to make them get out in the middle of the street and clearly made a mistake. We asked them to make sure they were paid for it.
Okay. I just I hope you can appreciate our sensitivity here. We have a lot of constituents who come through who really suffer at the hands of non consensual toll companies, some of the bad actors. So to see this, and it it says Valley Service and hotel employees. We really wanna make that not only in the future which is great but what happened to this person? Do you even know if she paid a few $100 to get her car released or sounds like they wouldn't even cooperate with officers?
When when I saw this, we asked the valet company because we instructed them to they should pay for that. That should not be the cost of the employee. My understanding he has not got back to me yet. My understanding is that they did but I can find out for sure.
Thank you.
Madam chair? The extended report has some extra detail.
It does.
May help elucidate some of the kind of questions here without, I guess, getting into too much detail or offering detail. It's in some of the testimony. So some of these questions are answered. With regard to the consensual or non consensual nature of this, I don't believe it was consensual. So as far as authorization to enact that tow, it wasn't there. The tow company is identified in here. We have had dealings with them prior.
Thank you.
Thank you. This is in the 6th Automatic District. Did you did you have questions about the police report auto mechanics?
I guess maybe for the sergeant. It does say there's some trade staff, and I'm trying to quickly read the expanded version. I'm still not clear. Were there a trade hotel actual staff who also refused the police officer's direction about the towing.
So from the extended report, it does say that they asked the front desk manager to call the tow company as well.
And they refused? They refused.
Is it I guess for the attorney, is it your contention that conversations have also been had with that front desk staff or staff period at the tray about not doing it, the towing piece?
Sorry. I'm I'm I misunderstood. My understanding was that the instruction was given to the employees of the third party tow company. I can let my clients chime in as to what what they did or did not with that
particular So I guess
the question for the representatives of the trade is you said that you have talked with the valet folks. Have you talked to your own staff about this as well?
Absolutely.
Is the person, the manager that works for you all who refused the police's direction to call the tow folks are still employed with you all?
No. The front desk manager from April 2025 is not employed here anymore.
And this is not a police question. If the toll was illegal and there was a refusal on the part of both the valet staff and the trade staff to provide the information requested by police. Is there a reason that, like, no tickets, no nothing was done? Or at least that's what it looks like. Was there anything done?
So I'd have to follow-up with the district, yes, the district officers who investigated it should have been able to either issue citations to the tow operator based on them doing a nonconsensual tow. I'd have to review to see if this company has the nonconsensual tow authorization. But even so, they didn't follow procedure because they would have had to get a tow authorization prior to removing the vehicle. Right. Obviously, there's citations that could have been issued, and then we could have also made referrals for theft of a vehicle. Mhmm. So but without having had those conversations with the district officers, I wouldn't be able
to answer those questions.
So beyond this hearing today,
I do wanna follow-up with you about just the
police actions in this case. Also, do we know if the person ever ever got the cover?
It's not noted in this report.
I'm done with the question. Thank you.
Thank you. Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify? Wow. Let the record reflect that there are no neighbors present who wish to testify. This is in the 6th Automatic District, Alderman Cox.
I too found that element of the police report to be a little undisturbing. I do give credit to the trade for working with my office to figure out a solution moving forward. And aside from, you know, that item, I think the trade has been a a pretty good kind of corporate neighbor in the district. So I would just request a approval with a warning letter based on the police report. And I would hope that the training you now give to your own staff as well as to valet services and any subcontractors prevent incidences like this from happening again in the future.
Thank
you. Thank you.
Bebcia.
Audrey and Burgales.
A quick question for Trade. Do you or do any of your third party vendors currently still contract with Legends Towing?
I I don't know but
I I can find out. I I don't believe because the way it's set up now, we don't have any contracts to companies that would not be in need.
My my guess is that it's a a one time call.
No, I don't. The legislation.
No, we don't have a contract
with them.
Okay. Thank you.
Madam Chair. Audrow Member Hour.
Actually, do we have a motion on the floor?
No. Oh, we are about to go in committee. Okay.
I never mind. I had a question for
me and a motion on the floor and
a comment.
Oh, you can go ahead and ask your question.
Okay. Yeah. Yeah. No.
I just had a quick question here.
I mean, it sounds like we want to move forward with approval which I would support. I'm just looking on the National Labor Relations Board case search here. Looks like we've got one, two, three, four, five unfair labor practice charges filed against NCG Hospitality, DBA Trade Pool held, DD Lodging, Investors LLC. What what's what's going on there?
I got remind the the the committee that the purview of the approvals here. I don't have any updates on those specific cases. I'm not engaged for the, employee, component of representation, just the licensing committee, approvals.
Cool. Just a curiosity. Are your employees represented by union unions at this location? No,
they're not.
Okay. Has NCG Hospitality or DD Lodging Investors LLC made public comments or statements to employees about whether they should or shouldn't be unionized? Are you guys committed to supporting the labor movement?
Unaware.
Okay.
So you guys wouldn't be neutral to your employees forming a union? You'd be oppositional in the future if they decide to file a representation election?
We are not authorized to speak on that behalf for the this corporate entity. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. So we are in committee. Does the committee have a motion?
Move move approval with, warning letter.
Motion by remembereguelis is approval with the warning letter. Hearing and seeing no objection, so ordered. Good luck. Thank you. Thank you.
Next up on our 01:20PM agenda. Alright. Okay.
Joel D. Likos. Likos.
Musicians, karaoke, and patrons dancing for Crops in the Kitchen at 3700 North Fradney. Say that again. Say your last name again. Jo Losek. Please raise your right hand to be sworn.
The from the Defense and Branches of Virginia of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony we're about to give is the truth of whole truth and a family of the truth?
I do. Thank you.
Are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied?
Yes. K.
Please state your name and address for the record.
That's Joel Lahosek. 11332 North Country View Drive, Mequon, Wisconsin.
Thank you. Miss Lopez, are there any holds? No holds. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
No police reports.
Is this new? No. Yes. Okay. This is a new application. Can you please tell us about your plan and experience for the business?
Yes. So, back in 2021, I started, the crops on top farm, urban farm, and which kind of rolled over me being a chef for my life. I decided I can use all this produce like I sell to the community and I can use this produce to do catering as well. So that's burned kitchen build and created an event space, a small space for 49 people or less. And so then we'll have catering and would be able to offer beer and wine as an option for events.
Okay.
Thank you. Does Auto Woman Combs, you have any questions about the planned experience? No. Okay. Committee have any questions about the planned experience for the business? Alright. Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify? Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present.
Got one.
Oh, I do. Okay. Please go into the standing mic. Just gonna state your name and address for the record and you'll be given two and a half minutes to speak.
I'm Willie Caritas. And you're
gonna be raise your right hand to be sworn
It's in only affirmative defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, whole truth, and no female the truth?
I will.
Thank you, sir.
Your name and address?
Willie Caritas. 423 East Dover Street, Milwaukee 53207.
Okay. And you can start
your I'm the executive director of the East Capital Business Improvement District, and Joel is in our district, and I just wanted to offer my support. He's the kind of business that we need, and he's extremely talented chef as well as a farmer. And I think this is just the kind of thing that Milwaukee needs. That's all I've got.
Any questions from the applicant for this witness?
Any questions from the committee for this witness? Questions from Alderman Cox for the witness? Alright. Thank you. This is in the 6th Automatic District, Alderman Cox.
Thank you, madam chair. I look forward to this business, and several neighbors have shared with me that they look forward to it as well. I will ask the applicant to forgive me because we should have had the conversation before, But to be consistent with how I've treated other businesses who apply for the same entertainment license, I would ask that we hold the entertainment license with the intention of allowing you to get permits first to try out some of the entertainment that you're trying to do. And then after you do that with no incident or police issues or neighbor complaints, then we could go for the full blown entertainment license. But I would just ask that we hold the entertainment license for now.
And whatever entertainment you wanna do, just fill out the permits. I'm more than
happy to
Okay. Sign.
Okay. And I would and I would hope that you approve it. I look forward to it being in
the district. Okay. Thank you. Who we are in committee? Does the committee have a motion? Armin Jackson.
Move approval. Behold the pep.
Right. Okay. The motion by Armin Jackson is approval holding open the pep. Any objections to that motion? Hearing and seeing none, so ordered. Thank you mister Lowe's.
Alright. Thank you. Good luck.
Next up on our 01:25PM agenda. We have Migdalia Kukuda, agent for Legends Towing LLC, recycling, salvage, and towing premises renewal application with change of agent, removing stockholder and team. We're to going to
Anyone testify as well?
Sir, are you gonna be testifying? Major.
Uh-huh. Yeah. The solemnly affirm on the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is a true, the whole truth, and a Yes. Yes. Thank you. Are
you in receipt of notes of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied? Please state your name and address for the record. McDalia Kukuda. Can you grab the mic and speak
to me?
McDalia Kukuda. 2008 North Holton Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212. Okay.
Hi, Michael. Attorney Mike Mistleman on behalf of miss Kukuda.
You also wanna state your Okay. Julio Arias. Okay.
No address, please?
2008 North Holton.
Okay. Thank you. Miss Lopez, are there any holds? No holds. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
There's no police reports.
Okay. Is this
Can I comment on the
police report? There's nothing there.
Please stop. Okay. Am I just going to the neighbors? Is this for Okay. So this was filed because of objections.
Do you
want me to go? And we have Nicole Anderson from the tow lot as well on the board. Nicole, can you please raise your right hand to be sworn in?
Do you saw me affirm on the defense penalties of perjury at the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
I do.
Thank you. Just state your name and, I guess, and your address for the record. Use a toll out address.
Oh, Nicole Anderson. 3811 West Lincoln Avenue.
And you can begin your testimony.
Okay. Good afternoon. Legends currently doesn't have anything in collections with Kone, but they do owe the city $7,798.65. But it is not delinquent.
Right. Right. Right. Right. Right.
What does it do?
So there's $2,933.65 that is more than 60 days old. That's with interest added. $2,590 is more than thirty days old, and $2,275 is less than thirty days old.
So $3,000 is delinquent?
None. Correct.
Sixty days sixty days old is delinquent. Right?
The totals the total said the total thirty days old older older older is 7,800.
If you had to make something. Okay.
Yes. It's it's delinquent after ninety days. That's when they
get some
liquor call. After ninety days. Okay. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you. Does the Question.
Oh, yes. I'm sorry, madam chair. Just a question about the delinquency issue. By the time of counsel, so it would not have reached ninety days?
That's why it's fourteen.
Nope. That's But
he could
be the full summoner.
That's May.
The question for question for DPW, what date Yeah. Is the current sixty day balance ninety days? The
the attorney for the folks are just saying they're willing to pay it all off before counsel. I know that we couldn't necessarily require that based on the timing, but if they're willing to, can we make that a part of the
As far as like a contingency or anything like that, those are just not recognized by the court. So once we grant, there's there has to be a statutory or ordinance allowing us to not issue them. So once the body as in the common council in total grants, then there can't be any like stopping issuance unless there is a statutory or again ordinance hold. So we couldn't agree to withhold that. They could just then over top us.
So any agreement that's formed effectively could be taken over top by them effectively saying, you granted, why aren't you issuing? So what you could do instead is, know, obviously, could pull it out of the file. So there are mechanisms by which you could enact what is in effect a contingency, but it wouldn't be an actual built in contractual contingency. It would be by effect.
That's what I just said the same thing exactly. Yes.
I just we can't form an agreement like that. What we can do is operational or procedurally stop grant of license. So in effect, we hold all the cards. There is no agreement to be struck.
Can I place you So these bills are ninety days out? They send it to us ninety days out in the first place. So I just paid over $70,000 in the last month because it was in collections because the last agent got deported, and so we had to cover all that out to get everything out of collections. These bills are billed to us ninety days later. So that's why sixty days or thirty days out because they billed ninety days later. So technically, we're not we don't owe nothing until the next bill come out because they bill it to us ninety days later.
Nevertheless, they said that they would pay before council and if we don't, then we, you, all women can hold it and send it back.
I know where were we.
If she don't.
We just paid $20,000 last week.
Okay. It's all good.
Thank you, guys.
Thank you. Are there any questions from committee?
I have. Okay.
Alderperson's on the road.
I know I appreciate attorney Mason making a thing about no police report but we did hear the applicant chime in when we had the trade application up just a little while ago. And so did wanna ask about that item around it was you. Right? It was Legends Towing like What you happened there? The unwillingness to release the car even at the request of MPD.
That wasn't us. We released the car for free. And we had a contract from the trade saying they're saying that there was it was their whole block, that they owned the vehicle back for free. The customer never paid nothing. Once once once we was observed that they didn't own the block because we they said that they owned the block, and so we had a letter from Nick stating that he they owned the block.
Once the police officers told us that we released the vehicle for free.
So initially, you did not, but you're saying ultimately you did? Because it
No. We did release the car. I
never It says the tow company was not cooperative and refused officers' request to release the vehicle.
On a Sunday.
Can I may I pop chime in? I just was retained, and I have I had don't have that report.
While we spoke to it during committee, you probably heard you were in here. So you heard extensive No.
I I didn't. But I I Dialogue. I mean, I'm just
You've been here all day, attorney.
Madam Chair.
I'm sorry. Attorney Gresham.
As it hasn't been properly noticed, even though there is effectively an admission of engagement and and interaction there, we could do kind of one or two things here. So one thing would be to circulate the prior police report in its extended version and have it reviewed by counsel. So give us a five to ten minute break. Or alternatively, we can kind of leave it here with the understanding that there has been at least some admission and there has been some kind of addressing of the issue. Maybe we haven't fully fleshed it out.
Maybe it hasn't landed on a police report for deliberation here. But at the same time, there is there has been some back and forth and I think that there is at least some resolution with regard to the specific matter that was in front of us previously. So again, either we give them a chance, at looking at the police report of a prior business that involved them in which they were implicated or we kind of leave it here.
Okay. Madam Chair. That's fine. I'll leave it up to Madam Chair. I just do want to indicate I don't think it was a stretch. We have the applicant chiming in on the trades application. The attorney has been here all day. It's been lovely to see him here. And I don't think it was I don't think it's out of line to then ask them about something that they chimed in about just a few minutes ago, but I'll leave it up to the purview of the chair.
I was hired Okay. About a minute before Okay. I I came in here. So I wasn't paying attention.
Okay. We will leave it where it is. Since it wasn't noticed, we won't go into it. And thank you to the tow lot. I don't know. It does do you have any other questions on the tow lot? Applicant, do you have any questions for the tow lot? Okay.
As I said before, we paid everything that they told us to do. Like I said, we have ninety days. Like, she said, becomes delinquent after ninety days. So nothing's ninety days.
And and I all I have to say is I heard she's doing a better job than Peter Cox. Mm-mm. Peter knows I'm joking.
Thank you.
Knox. Sorry.
Thank you. All right. We are in the 6th Automatic District. Auto woman Cox.
I do have one more thing. I don't know if you want me to go before.
Auto person's memory.
I did just get, a note from staff that there is indication in the plan of operation from 2024 that Julio is Adios would not be involved with non consensual toes or deal with the because of past issues. So can we figure out what's going on and how he's involved? Because he is speaking at length about sounds like doing nonconsensual toes.
Dealing with the public, that's not the public. A part of the company. It was ordered that I wouldn't deal with the public. There was no public being dealt with with me.
Madam chair, it doesn't sound like there was a contract between the company and the the tow company and the and the valet. So this may not fall within that stipulation.
Mhmm. And what about do we need clarification? I I didn't just say public. I said
Oh, sure.
It indicated Julio
There was nothing about I told her the Please
let me finish. Julio Arias would not be involved with non consensual tows nor would he deal with the public.
I didn't tow a vehicle.
You you just spoke at length not just during your own application here but on somebody else's application about nonconsensual tows.
I didn't tow the vehicle. They said I would not be towing any nonconsensual vehicles. And I think that we spoke about that because of the attitude. I didn't tow the vehicle.
So you speak in the first hand about another who who was it then?
You talk speaking about something that happened, like, over a year ago. I I don't I don't know exactly.
What what do
you do?
So you
don't know but at the business?
I deal with the managers and property
owners. Okay.
I set up repossession contracts because now we do repossession contracts. I deal with the managing the the employees, stuff like that. I don't deal with the public nor do I do tows.
But you only said that just now when I reminded you about a note in the record from the last time.
Can please
Hold on. I I he didn't say he was towing. He was speaking on behalf of what the company's doing. I'm I'm that's what I understood. He didn't say I'm towing or I towed. He was talking about, for instance, the one at the hotel. I mean, it sounds like you kinda like a a manager.
Yeah. And all I said is we don't have the contract Yeah. No more. That's all I said. In which
Okay. Alright. That's what
I'm Okay. Okay. Alright. This is in this are you we're in the sixth automatic constraint on the Cox.
That is I guess for the licensed manager, is that same criteria with the change of agent or whatever is going on here, is that same criteria with the not working with the public as well as not actually doing tolls? Is that included in this application?
Yes, sir.
It would carry over as there's no statement saying or asking for that to be removed.
Okay. But we
could reaffirm it too.
Sounds good. Okay.
I the I'm gonna respect the the chair wanting to leave the the trade thing here. I I do have more questions, though. The the whole back and forth just made me have more questions, and I'll I'll reach out to your attorney after this about on this application itself as long as it still has that stipulation on it. I guess I would not object. I would suggest to the to the agent, though, that she take heed of the conversation here today and make sure that future dealings kinda prevent some of the stuff that's being questioned here today.
I understand. Alright. Thank you.
Thank you. We are in committee. This committee have a motion.
I'm sure.
Attorney Jackson.
Move approval.
Okay. Motion by Attorney Jackson.
Think she said with a warning letter,
approval with a warning letter.
Okay. Motion by Arteman Jackson is approval with a warning letter. Hearing saying no objection. Suborder.
Good luck.
I I don't need to do a closing. It's okay.
Beat it.
Next up on our one hundred thirty PM agenda, we have DaVita Clifton, agent for Holton Convenience Store LLC. No. Food dealer and weights and measures license application with change of agent and transfer of stock for Stoner's Bakery and Dispensary at 2501 North Holton Street. Is DaVita Clifton present? I
know that's precisely what.
DaVita Clifton? I don't see it up there, do you?
Hold on.
Okay. Motion by oh, have you heard from her at all licensing? No. You heard from her, Alderman Cox? I have not. Okay. Motion by Alderman Jackson is to hold hearings and no objections so ordered.
This is the first line
of hearing? Yes. Next up on our 01:35PM agenda in the 11th District, we have Michael B. Newman, agent for Family Dollar Stores of Wisconsin LLC, food dealer license renewal application with change of agent for Family Dollar, number 26394 at 3937 South 76th Street. Is Michael b Newman present?
He is appearing by attorney Zach Rebelski. I also have district manager Yvonne White on the board. I know she's on vacation and was hoping to sign on. I see her name, but she's muted and no camera.
I am here.
I am here. Okay. Yvonne, can you please raise your right hand to be sworn in?
Do you solemnly affirm on the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and a few but the truth? I do. Thank you.
Thank you. And you are a stage of appearance. Are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied?
We are.
You you stage Miss Lopez, are there any holds? No holds. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
No police reports.
Family dollar. Welcome to
the 11th Aldermanic District.
I said
in a family dollar. Let me see.
Woah. Is that what it's like?
Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify?
You love the Baldwin District.
Why is it scheduled?
Madam Chair.
There are no neighbors present who wish to testify. We do have an objection on file. We are going go to Alderman Peter Bergella.
Thank you, madam chair. This is the power of community where a believe it or not, Alders do watch and monitor next door for neighborhood complaints and concerns. This particular store was had concerns and photos posted where customers and residents were objecting to conditions inside the store. General disorder, floor tiles that were sticky, cracked, broken. I looked at the I stopped by the business, agreed with that with those observations, contacted the store, and met with the district manager on-site, the store manager.
They had already begun a robust cleaning program to improve conditions at the store. Some of the repairs were already completed. Others were in process. They are not yet completed, but I'm satisfied that there's a strong effort from the store to maintain cleanliness and keep the store in good shape.
Okay. Thank you.
I have no question.
I'm blanking. I know you don't want to say anything after that. I don't even know what to do. So we are in the 11th District. Did you wanna
I recommend approval with the warning letter.
Okay. Motion by Alderman Berglis' approval with a warning letter. Are there any objections to that motion? Hearing and seeing none, so ordered.
Good luck.
Thank you. Thank you. And I will stay for the next one.
Oh, okay.
As long as you're here. Alright?
Oh, that goes off. So next up on our 01:40PM agenda, we have Maria Blake, agent for Go Brands Incorporated, extended hours establishment and food dealer licenses renewal application with change of agent for Go Puff at 2037 North Farwell Avenue. Is Maria Blake present?
She appears virtually and with counsel attorney general Krabelski.
Okay. And miss can you please raise your right hand to be sworn in?
Do you saw me affirm on the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony we you're about to give is a true, the whole truth, and a human being truth? I
do. Thank you. Are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied?
We are.
Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
holds. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
No police reports. Okay.
Are there any neighbors present who wish to testify? This is scheduled because of things to Objection. Objection. This is scheduled because of objections as well. Do we? Sorry. Yes. Yeah. There's nobody here to testify. Audrowan Brower?
Yeah. Let me just we took a look. Our office sent over the objections that we've
quarter
we're going able
There was an allegation also of a vehicle driving 19. On the sidewalk. Although, you know, our look at the objection didn't seem to suggest that it was anything related to Gopuff. There was some photographs in the file as you guys might see of of a some tire tracks on the sidewalk. I mean, reckless driving is everywhere in Milwaukee.
I didn't have any indication from that and from the email that that was directly related to a GoPuff driver. Basically, just for the committee's notification, GoPuff is a convenience store that uses app drivers to do deliveries around the city of Milwaukee. So there the entity and this is I think one of the issues that we see recurring with this location is that the drivers are third party app drivers, so it could theoretically be anyone. I'm not entirely sure of the vetting process that GoPuff uses, but there's no indication that the driving on the sidewalk is related to GoPuff whatsoever and not just, you know, specifically, like, somebody just recklessly driving on the east side who went under the sidewalk, which obviously they shouldn't do. But I you know, my personal opinion on this and the opinion I'd like to push forward is that we, approve this.
I don't think there's a need at this time for a warning lever. I have been reached out to by GoPuff to work on any other issues that we have, you know, with neighbors. They've been willing to work with them. They've worked with neighbors in the past. So I think some of the specific issues that have been brought up also separately over to our office are issues of noise of the delivery drivers that there's a parking lot right next to the house or excuse me, there there are parking lot for the delivery drivers just right next to a residence but I think that we can work those out in further meetings with Gopuff. We do have to hold the steering notes today because of the file objection. Okay.
Thank you.
So I would I would like to see us approve this.
Thank you, honorable. Honorable Jackson.
Well, thank you, madam chair. I thought these pictures ain't here for the poor shoveling job.
And that was gonna be my point that there there is a loading zone here that was, put in last year with Alderman Brower's office and the truck simply couldn't use the loading zone in the street, not only the sidewalk that's where the tire tracks are, but that's where the issue is, I think, after the snowstorm happened in March and and Go Puff is willing to work with the alderman's office to figure out a solution there when there is snow but
Yeah. Let the client know. We gotta do more than just a single blade through. Yeah. We gotta do the whole thing.
Well, that that's further down the block but. No. But I agree.
Okay. Thank you, Patrick.
Thank you. So, this is in the 3rd Automatic District and you say you're moving. Oh, did I ask
her neighbors? You did.
Did. I did. Okay. I thought so.
Did we have any questions? Oh, you moved to our approval already
on tomorrow?
I would, I could, I'd make that motion if there's no further discussion.
We have any further questions or comments from committee. I don't know if she want to add anything. No. Okay.
Nothing. Okay.
Yeah. Motion by honorable Brower is approval. Hearing and saying no objection is so ordered. Thank you. Good.
Thank you.
Next up on our 01:45PM agenda. In the 5th District, we have Isabella M. Artega, agent for Cinco Locos Mexican Restaurant LLC, Class B Tavern Public Entertainment Premises and Food Dealer License renewal application for Cinco Locos Mexican restaurant at 3430 North 84th Street. Is Isabella Artega present? Yes. Please raise your right hand to be sworn in.
Do you
saw me from an independent penalty perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is a truth, whole truth, and a film of the truth? Yes. Thank you.
Are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility that your application may be denied? Yes. Please state your name and address for the record.
Isabella Arteaga. It's 5421 Meadow Drive, Grindel, Wisconsin 53129.
I have his notes.
He said
he can't make it.
Okay. Thank you. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds. Oh, sorry. There's a hopes that were hold.
Holds were out. Sergeant Conejo.
I'm sorry.
Sergeant Conejo, is there a police report?
102725 at 07:10PM, Wauke Police were dispatched to Wolferchuk. The business call regarding an intoxicated patron rolling around on the sidewalk in their own vomit. The subject was transported to a local hospital. On 12/2325 at 06:26PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a troubled subject. On arrival, the officers were advised the subject was no longer on scene and police services were no longer needed. Madam chair.
Attorney Gresham.
To licensing. Is it a you said it's a wholesaler hold?
Yeah. That actually was resolved so there's no hold now.
Okay.
It was a delinquent bill from
a wholesaler.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Okay. So it's now how old? Okay. Would the applicant like to speak to the items on the police report?
Yes. So we called because the ladies that were rolling on the sidewalk, we served them a pitcher of margaritas. It was two ladies, and we decided to cut them off because we decided yeah. They they showed a little, you know, being drunk and not able to drive so we offer to call them Ubers and everything but then they decided to go outside wait for their Ubers and roll start puking roll around in their. Vomit which we decided that was something that we couldn't. Control, and we decided to call and get us medical assistance. Does
the committee have any questions about the police report? Okay. Are there any neighbors to testify? Okay. Let the record reflect that there are no neighbors present to testify. Did you want to speak to Sure. This is in the 5th Automatic District. Alderman Westmoreland is not available to be with us, but we do have some notes. Yes. Okay. Person Samaripa.
Thank you, madam chair. Yes, alderman Westmoreland emailed me and and conferred also with Okay. Great.
I don't know what's more. Oh. Oh.
He's good.
We can proceed.
That's fine.
Okay. I'll continue.
Okay. Yes. My understanding from his communication with us was that he doesn't have any objection at at this time. There was objection submitted but he was able to confirm that it was just a misunderstanding. He didn't anticipate the objector showing up, but I I don't know if we asked for neighbors yet.
I did. Nobody showed up.
Okay. So given that, I believe he was I believe he's fine and has no objection at this time.
Okay. Thank you. Ordering Jackson moves approval. Hearing seeing no objections. So ordered. Thank you. Good luck. Thank you
so much.
Mhmm. Thank you. Yes.
Next up on our 01:50PM agenda on next.
I agree with him, but he he canceled. He pulled
the application. Oh, okay. Avtar Singh, agent for Northpointe Foods LLC, class a malt, class a liquor license application for Northpointe Foods at 3076 North 27th Street. Is Avtar Singh present?
Madam chair.
Alderman Jackson.
I talked to the applicant. There's a huge community pushback. We brought it safe and sound, the police department, their neighbors, and Armani, I think. And I talked to the applicant, told him it gonna be a rough day today. He decide to pull his application.
Alright. Do we have
confirmation from licensing, madam chair?
Sorry. Give me a moment.
Without that confirmation or without an actual affirmative statement on the record from the individual, a hold would be advisable. We don't want to accept a withdrawal that may not have actually materialized. So
Yeah. I have nothing on file regarding a withdrawal and the application is still alive in the system.
So move the hold and have them get that done before council? Correct.
I mean, ultimately, you know, it's yeah. I mean, for his own sake and for a reimbursement of the license fee, if he doesn't withdraw, then, you know, he's gonna not appear twice and then we'll bill him. If he withdraws, he gets at least, I think, some of his money back. So Alright.
Sounds good. Yeah. Who the?
Motion by Jackson is to hold. Hearing seeing no objections. So ordered. I'm next. Yes.
I'll take the gavel back madam chair. And we'll move on to our one hundred fifty five PM agenda item. Angela J Evans, agent for Michael Ray Gents Plus LLC, Class B Tavern and Public Entertainment Premises, licenses, renewal application. For Gold Diggers, MILW at 4715 North Hopkins Street. Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Alright. If you'll both raise your right hand, we'll get you both sworn in.
Do you sorry if from an independent of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and the film of the truth? Yes. Thank you.
You can really pull that mic. I think it's just the cable might be a little taut, but just give it yeah. Just give it
a hand. You.
There you go. Thank you. Alright. And are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Right. Yes. Okay. Very good. Thank you. Will you please state your name and address for the record?
Angela Evans. 5145 North Hopkins Street.
Okay. Thank you. And then will you also state your name and address for the record?
Michael Ray. 4750 North Hopkins.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, do you know?
There's no holds.
No holds? Very good. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
On 04/06/2025 at 10:26PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a noise complaint. On arrival, no noise was observed by police. The caller was On 04/1325 at 06:27PM, Walker police took a walk in battery. The citizen stated they were grabbed by the neck by the owner of the club. However, could not provide any specific information regarding the date and time of the incident. The citizen was, the citizen stated they would come back with information, however, never returned. On 04/1725 at 11:18PM, police were dispatched to a shooting. A witness stated security denied entrance to a suspect armed with a firearm in their waistband. The suspect then opened fire, opened the door, and began to fire rounds inside the business, striking two victims. The suspect was later observed shot and find out the business.
One victim was deceased on scene. The other was shot to the hand. The suspect was pronounced deceased at the hospital. 04/2225 at 11AM, Milwaukee Police along with community partners held a meeting with the business at the district regarding item 22, one recently read. The owner stated their security staff are unarmed and no patrons are allowed in with firearms.
However, they do not allow armed security staff that are patronizing the business inside if they have a CCW. Security measures were discussed with the owner who stated they will draft a new plan of action within a week and report a 10 PD. On 04/2825 at 12:45PM, Monty Police held a meeting with the agents. They were they were attentive and receptive to to to suggestions made from the officers regarding hiring a licensed security. Updating their security plan and conducting a CP CPAP. Subtip. Subtip. Subtip. At 08:31 twenty five at 08:14AM, while police were dispatched to a noise nuisance. On arrival, the business was closed.
However, it should be noted the original call came in at 01:58AM. At 09:28 twenty five at 12:10AM, while police were dispatched to noise nuisance. The caller stated patrons leaving the establishment were causing a disturbance. On arrival, the officer did not observe any anyone causing a disturbance. On twelve 09:25 at 12:45AM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to noise nuisance.
On arrival, the business closed and there were no vehicles playing on music. On 01/1826 at 11:58PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to battery. On arrival, security advised officers, two subjects were escorted out out for fighting and were no longer on scene. The caller stated they were hit by a subject and didn't know why they were being escorted out as well. The caller stated they no longer wanted to file a report. On 02/1626 at 10:51PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a battery. Investigation revealed suspects sprayed bear mace into the establishment. One suspect was taken into custody. The business was cooperative with the investigation and allowed officers to view video surveillance of the incident.
Thank you. Would you like to speak to the police report?
As far as the the shooting, that was the my security's best friend that came to do that to him. That I guess it was like a love triangle that ended at my doorstep. So the guy came from Chicago, so it was premeditated. There was no way we could have been prepared for something like that, but I do think my off duty officers did what they were supposed to do because if they didn't, it probably would have been a worse situation. As far as the the battery, I I'm thinking if I'm not mistaken that that was an incident where the patrons tried to come in the building due to a lady needing to use my bathroom because a neighboring bar bathroom had went out, so they was allowing customers to come by me.
And they ended up seeing a lady that they didn't like. They tried to get into the building. We denied them, and that's where the the the car situation where they were trying to ram their building with the car because we would not allow them to come in. So as far as all the noise complaints, there there wasn't any.
And with the shooting last April, that was two people that died? Mhmm.
The security guard and his friend that came to do that to him.
Okay. Further questions on the police report from committee members or underwoman Pratt? Yeah.
Do you
still allow people in as long as they have CCWs that can bring weapons in?
I mean, I haven't since then, but I really do think that in the neighborhood that I'm in, somebody has to have something if I hire.
But in the police report, it says that you allow Yeah. Off duty people when they have CCW.
If they
if my if they're my security guards and they're off duty, I definitely I'll as long as they've
not seen.
Your security is licensed and bonded?
They are. Okay. Yeah.
Do they pat people down before they go in or is there some so how does someone get in with bear mace?
No. They opened the door and just sprayed it into
the door.
Sprayed
it. It was the ladies that tried to get into the building. It was the exact next day. That's why when the police came, I let them see. They didn't even come in. They just opened the door and just sprayed bear mace. Okay. Also, the guy that tried to come in that did the shooting was also checked and he obtained I mean, he noticed that he had a fire on. He pushed him out the door because he knew what he came to do once he realized it was his best friend.
Okay. Alright.
Thank you. I I guess I can speak to I have spoken with the mother of the security guard, and she did I mean, she spoke to to her son working there, how he enjoyed it, and etcetera, and that it was a quarrel between friends that happened at his place of business. Uh-huh. Thank you. No problem.
I'm sure.
Alderman Brigales. Thank you. Can you
talk to us about the relationship you have with the bar next door?
He's he did my remark. That's a that's about I mean, I know the guy. He's a good guy. I just know that when I seen what he did to his place, I asked him, can he make my eye look better, basically. That's about it. He did remodel into my place.
In terms of operation No. Don't have. Other problems that spill over from one business to the other?
Well, I mean, when you got a big crowd, it's kinda hard to police the the cars and stuff like that, and that's probably where a lot of you know, when you first let out, everybody is leaving out. So they the police did come and ask us because we help them police the area. And we don't have a problem with it.
So you're helping the other bar?
Well, we're helping the the traffic. You're helping traffic people. Yeah. Some people do come across, you know, for a few seconds and they go back. So I feel like we do have help a little bit because we do get a lot of that. They close at twelve. We close at two. So, a lot of times, some of their people comes by us. So, I feel like we need to help or it's going be a bigger issue.
Okay. Thank you.
Alright. Anything further from committee members on the police report?
No. Not for me.
Okay. Are there any neighbors present that we should testify on this item? Yes. Rashonda Cleveland. Okay. Anybody else who wanna speak to, Gold Diggers? You bet. That's the
spot right
there. Oh.
Okay. So she's in support?
She's in support.
She wants to testify? Your mom?
No. No. The security
The security guard. Oh, okay. Very good. Well, we'll and then Roshanda, are you here in support or opposition?
Against. Against.
Against. Yes. And then the mom is here in support, correct? Who do we go with first?
Yes. Yes. Correct.
Okay. So we're gonna go with the neighbor who's here opposed to the application first. So miss Cleveland, will you raise your right hand and we'll get you or actually, will everybody who intends to testify today, can you raise your right hand and unmute because we're going get everybody sworn in at once. Okay. Thank you.
The only affirmative defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Yes. Okay. And then one more yes, I think I was waiting to hear. Yes. Okay. Thank you, ma'am. Alright. So then I will start with miss Cleveland. If you'll state your name and address, and then you'll have two and a half minutes to make remarks, miss Cleveland. Go right ahead. I'm Rashonda Cleveland. 4750 North 37th Street. I was
I'm I'm I'm against Gold Diggers. Lord Jesus. I've been testifying against Gold Diggers for years now because of the the loitering, the music. They they need security for outside they bar, not just inside. Because you see somebody got killed anyway, and they had security inside. But my thing is they need security outside because they need them to control their customers. And he say he closed at two. People be still coming out that back door. I got it on camera. I sent video footage to miss autumn miss miss Pratt, and I sent video footage to the license board of them coming out way past then.
They sit around. They lord her. They playing music. I'll send videos of that to the license board to miss Pratt. It's ridiculous. Our neighborhood can't get no sleep. I mean and you just heard him say, options close at twelve midnight. That's when he should be closed too, just so the neighborhood can get some sleep and get some peace. But no. Instead, he stays open to whenever he chooses to close, and then we gotta suffer the consequences because his his customers are being very disrespectful, ful, loitering, playing music, using a bathroom outside.
You name it, they doing it. And it's just ridiculous. And by the time you call the police, because of the news and the noise complaint, they gone. Or either they turn their lights off and they sit in their cars and turn the music off. So, you know, it's just too much. It's seven days a week with gold diggers. It's been like this for years. You know? And it's it's I don't know why he can't get it under control or what the problem is, but I don't know. But I'm gonna keep testifying against him until he's gone because he is a big problem in our neighborhood.
Thank you. Thank you, miss Cleveland. If you'll stay for questions. Any questions from committee members or the local alderwoman for Ms. Cleveland?
No. Just thank you for testifying Ms. Cleveland.
All right. Okay. Any questions? Only questions from the applicant for Ms. Cleveland?
Ms. Cleveland, do you still choose not to work with me? If you're having these many problems that nobody else has it, why do you refuse to work with me?
Right. Michael Ray Cene, you know I had a meeting with you with mister Rainey when he was in office at the library on the village. It was me, you, and a police officer and a other person. And we had I told you what my complaints was. You said you was gonna fix them. Time we left that meeting, you got back to that building to the bar, and you acted a fool. Y'all kept us up to 04:00 that morning. You was on a motorcycle, burning rubber, had the whole neighborhood smoking from your tires burning from your motorcycle at four in the morning. I got that video still too. So I'm telling you, you know I've been trying to work with you.
I ain't gotta go through all that. We had meetings and and and it's been verified, and I'm not gonna keep doing that with you. You just keep you got everybody else over here terrified and scared to to tell the truth, but I'm not, And you know that. And I'm not gonna let you get away with not being held accountable. And it's just that simple. Thank you.
No problem. Do you have any contact information for me that I tried to give to you?
I don't wanna speak to you because you're a liar. And your number's on the back of your barn door.
That's enough. No personal insults, please. Does that conclude your question, sir? Yes. Okay. Thank you, miss Cleveland. We appreciate your time and your testimony today. I'm gonna move on now, and we're gonna hear the other witnesses', testimony. Ma'am, will you start with your name and address? And then I'll put two and a half minutes on the clock for you. You can go right ahead. Are you speaking to me, ma'am? Yes, ma'am. Hi.
My name is Yvette Wright, and my address is 4827 North 22nd Street. I'm I'm I'm here because I know my my son was the security officer that worked at Gold Diggers that got killed. On behalf of Gold Diggers and Mike, I would like to say that Gold Diggers had nothing to do with that incident. That was a personal matter between my son and the other guy who got killed out there. So that with that being said, I feel I I don't know how anybody else feel.
My son got killed there, and it's confident to me to go to Gold Diggers, either ride by or either just stand out there because of that was the last place that son was. I don't want them to lose their their gentleman club license. I mean, because I understand maybe they have an issue, but I haven't had any issues. And like I said, I don't want him to be held accountable for something that was not his fault or the club's fault because my son worked there. He was a security officer there.
And, yes, that's the my son died doing what he loved to do, and he was protecting that club. That's what he got hired for. And the club had nothing to do with that. So on my behalf, I find no fault in nothing that, you know, they're doing. You know, the music, I mean, that's what I thought a club was for. You you you have music. You know, I thought that's what it it was for. I didn't know. You know, maybe it's too loud. I don't know because when I go there, it it eases me.
So I'm not saying just for me, but I'm also thinking about the people that works there. So if you do anything to the club, which I understand, whatever's going on, that's gonna put a lot of people out of employment, and that's gonna take a lot away from mine too. It will hurt me if they close Gold Biggers down. It it it really would because that would be something that that that's kinda personal to me. This issue is personal to me.
And every time he goes up against the council, the alderman, whatever he has to go up through to to get through this, I'm gonna be right there beside him because, like I said, my son that was my son's last thing, and he loved his job, and I love my son. And thank you, ma'am.
No. Thank you, ma'am, and thank you for being here with us today. And the committee and myself extend our deepest condolences to you and it means a lot to hear you come here today and offer testimony in support of the applicant. With that, any questions from committee members or Alderman Pratt as as the local holder for?
No, just thank you miss Wright for coming. You're welcome. Thank you.
Thank you. And any questions from the applicant for miss Wright at this time?
Okay. Alright. Thank you so much, miss Wright. Again, appreciate you greatly.
Thank you.
And looks like that does conclude our testimony. Our neighborhood testimony. So, with that, we are in the first Aldermanic District. Alderman Pratt.
Alright. I have been talking with mister Ray quite a bit. I don't know. I guess I have a little confusion around this. I thought there was a plan to change this club. I don't see that on here.
I I was supposed
That you were releasing one of the licenses
I mean, that's that's a little different.
I didn't remember. I said I didn't know how to process work. I've never done that before.
Okay. So then what I'm gonna do then, I'm gonna hold this so you can talk to licensing and figure out how do that because I don't wanna approve it as is because the plan was not for this to be
Yeah. It was
Yeah. Contingent to Yeah. Be open.
It certainly is.
But that's not on the the agenda yet. Okay. They haven't even I haven't seen it. That's I why thought we was, like, supposed to have them, like, almost back to back. So that way I can transfer and it'll turn into a regular place, and then the license will go to the to the other one.
Okay. And the license plate.
There I'm I apologize. I'm not sure if this made it to the record or not. There is a letter that was submitted stating gold diggers will transfer the adult entertainment license to the Venom nightclub Yes. Once license is approved and issued.
Okay.
Alright. Okay.
That's what I
so Is that
I've I've never heard of a transfer of an adult entertainment license nor is, you know, transfer of a class a or it's a Class B, sorry. And then this I mean, a different location, I guess, so generally speaking Yeah. A location? Yes.
Sorry. Also, I mean, we can hold the PEP if you want to renew the Class B. The PEP, we can transfer to the new location. But I think from my understanding, he still wanted entertainment there, but just not the adult entertainment.
Yeah. He was doing everything but everything but adult entertainment at Go Diggers.
Correct.
You said we're gonna match the hours of options. I mean, you'd close at twelve.
And you were transferring the entertainment license to the other club. Yes. That's my understanding. To include like in what else?
I have nothing regarding the change of hours. That's why I'm making the face. Sorry. Oh.
Oh, yeah. So, the that was part of it that. Yes. The the hours at Go Diggers will match the hours at options which is the club across the street and they kind of interact quite a bit, which may cause some issues. So that he's matching the hours.
Do you wanna hold it then so we can figure out and get everything straightened out? I guess so.
Yeah. What does the hole consist of? I'm not sure. I've never had it held before.
So if it gets held, if we're able to get everything straightened out, the alderman can put it on the consent agenda for the twelfth with those changes. And then, obviously, if the committee wanted to approve it, you do have a provisional so you can continue operating, but then we'll work out the logistics of how everything would work out. Obviously, the change of hours would be listed, but then how to move the entertainment from this location to the other.
Okay. Okay.
So I'll move to hold. And then we'll talk.
Yeah. Okay.
No Definitely talk to licensing to figure out what your next steps are. No problem. Yeah. Okay. Alright.
So I'm able to operate until
You have a provisional so you can keep operating now.
Where you are. Okay.
Continue to operate. You have a provisional license in place.
Okay. Thank you.
Alright. Well, then, elder woman Pratt moves to hold this item to the call of a chair. That's okay. And hearing no objections are ordered. Thank you. So, we will move on now to our 02:05PM agenda item. Singh, agent for Ravneet Petro Inc. Two, extended hours establishments, filling station, food dealer, and weights and measures licenses, renewal application with change of hours from closing 2AM every day to close 3AM every day at for pantry eighty one at 2812 West Fond Du Lac Avenue. Is Khan Khanwarvir Singh present?
Yes, ma'am.
Alright. Good afternoon.
Good afternoon. And
is Alderman Stamper with us virtually as well? He was up there.
Oh, yeah. He is.
Yes, ma'am. Thank you. Uh-huh.
Alright. Great. Good afternoon to both of you. If you'll raise your right hand, we'll get you sworn in.
Yes, ma'am.
Do you
solely inform on an events and beliefs of burglary of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Yes, ma'am.
Thank you. Thank you. Alright. Mister Singh, are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Yes, ma'am.
Alright. And will you please state your name and address for the record?
Kunbhab Singh. That's 4233 West Shostik Summit Pass, Franklin, Wisconsin 53132.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds.
Okay. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
02/1925 at 10PM, an officer was dispatched to trouble subject complaint. The caller stated the ATM stole his money and an employee was refusing to give him them a refund. The call was no longer seen upon arrival. A check of merchandise revealed some expired food items which employee stated they would take care of immediately. On 03/03/2025 at 04:11PM, also we have dispatched to a battery complaint.
An unknown subject imply they had a weapon, pushed an employee, and threatened to come back to to damage property. At three five or twenty '5 at 04:03PM, officers were dispatched to total subject. An employee asked the known subject that refused that that was caused as a servant in the past to leave, but they refused. The subject was gone prior to officer's arrival. On 03/1125 at eight 02:38AM, an officer was dispatched to trouble with subject complaints.
An employee called regarding two subjects in the lot engaged in a verbal argument. The subjects were advised. The employee was cooperative during the investigation. On 03/2125 at 08:51PM, officer dispatched to a property damage complaint. The subject was put subject previously banned from the property and knocked items off shelves before exiting the business. On 07/09/2025 at 02:13PM, officers are dispatched to a troubled subject complaints. An employee reported a female loitering near the gas pumps refusing to leave and making threats to cause damage. Security camera footage was requested to be emailed to to be emailed. Alright. On 07/1025 at 12:57PM, officers conducted follow-up on a reported robbery.
Security camera footage provided by the business showed two suspects and the victim here in gas pump. Suspect one removed the victim's wallet from their rear pocket. The incident was determined to be a theft from person. On 10/1025 at 07:44PM, officers conducted a traffic stop in the lot which led to arrest being made. A canvas of the business followed A manager on scene stated the business is open seven days a week, twenty four hours. Three employees are always on duty with a total of five employees. There is no security company contracted. There are working security cameras, but only accessible by the owner. No violations observed. On 12/1525 at 08:18PM, officers were dispatched to a battery complaint.
An employee identified the caller as a problem person. The caller refused any additional police services, and the battery was found to be baseless. On 01/04/2026 at 01:59PM, officers were dispatched to a theft of firearm. The victim reported they had their gun in their hand when a male grabbed it and ran off.
Alright. Thank you. Mister Singh, do you wanna speak to the police report?
Yes, ma'am. Like, 90 purse I'm I'm in this neighborhood for too long. For last ninety year, I'm work working and owning the business on this neighborhood. 90%, we solve our own the problems there's no major issues in this neighborhood. 792025.
The lady was overdosed and start smoking crack on the building. That time, well, they have a needle on hand or they have a weapon on hand, and we don't wanna go close to them, and then we involve the the police and we call the police. But most of the time, we handle our own. Like, they are my regular customer coming every single day, I have no problems with the yeah. Sometimes the people come from outside and give us a hard time or that time, we have they have a weapon or needles or doing a drug dealing.
I cannot involve on that. So that time, we have to get a help for the police. Like, happened in a robbery thing happened in at at Pump 1. Old man, I see the video. They they the both guy who did the robbery, they outstand on a 25th and the lights on a. Outstand and panhandling over there. I give them a video of, I think, police. I don't know whether they have the further they did, but not from a neighborhood, basically, what I'm saying.
Alright. Questions on the police report from committee members? Police report from alderman stamper.
Yes. So I think 95% of those calls were by the business, and that's just the calls. It's a very active and busy corner right off on the left, which is connected to a block that's
Mister Alderman Stamper, sorry the call was dropping a little bit. Can you start over again? No. That's connected. Alderman Stamper, I'm so sorry. We cannot we're not getting We're not able to hear you well. Maybe he's maybe he's going to log back in perhaps.
Yes. He said he's already started. Hopefully, that's what I had.
Alright. Let me just while we're waiting for our Alderman Stamper to log back in, are there any neighbors present that wish to testify on this item today? Any neighbors present to testify on Pantry 81 on Fond Du Lac? Okay, let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. And I think
Can you hear me? Can you hear me? Can you hear me?
Hi, Alderman Stamper. Yes, That sounded much more clear.
Okay. Thank you. Sorry. I appreciate your patience. Yes. Now, what I was saying is that that particular business is on a right on a busy corner connect to just connect to the neighborhood. So it's a lot of activity. It's always busy and a lot of people hanging out. So the fact that they made all those proactive calls, and I believe 95 to a 100% of them were the business calling the police. I know I I can understand the situation. So mister Singh is very ingrained in the neighborhood. He does a lot of credit. There's a lot of work over there. I would just ask him, does he think he needs a security at this moment?
know those three employees. I I honestly got two more, but and I know you're at the store a lot, but let me ask you this. Do you think it's time for security, or are you are you still willing to handle proactive proactive business?
On the West Temple, like, as you know, the Robert mister Robert Kimberly, he is from a neighborhood. I hired him especially for this, and he's doing very, very well job from last many, many years. And people send their kids to my business because of him, because they know Robert is working over there.
I I forgot about I forgot I forgot about Robert. I forgot about Robert. Yeah. Okay.
Yes. So rather than be hiring a security, I would like to give a job to the neighborhood person who who willing to do this and who know the neighborhood from and he doing his job very well. We don't have that many problems at the as you say, it's a busy location.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So you don't have any problems because a lot of calls is my point. So just just we'll
we'll
just stay proactive and I the committee don't I don't have any objections. Okay.
Thank you, Alderman Stamper. I think we'll head into committee. Does this committee have a motion?
I'm sure. Yes. Alderman Jackson. Motion to approve with the warning letter, but I will deny the extended hour. 2AM to 3AM. Is that what we discussed?
I just heard this alderman say he doesn't have any issue, but I don't know if you want to
Well, we didn't break it up. Alderman Stamper, do you agree with the hour change?
No. I'm I'm he asked me that two years ago. He he was on probation for three years in order to get that time. So he put in his work for two to three years in order to get that request. I told him he had no issues. Until that, I would I would grant him the three 3AM, and that's that's what happened. So it's been a history, and he proved himself over time.
Right. So he said he's good with 3AM? He just said he's good with 3AM.
I wasn't was that I wasn't clear. Was you good with the 3AM or not?
Yeah, I'm good with the 3AM based on historical time in probation from not being on 3AM for years.
Okay. So now he's And so now you are amenable to 3AM, correct, Alderman Stamper?
I'm amenable to 3AM based on not being 3AM and asking years ago to be on 3AM.
Understood. Does that sound good, Alderman Jackson?
That sound good.
So you are moving approval with a warning letter?
Is that right? Okay. Alderman Deandre Jackson has moved approval with a warning letter. Any discussion on that motion? Any objection? Hearing none, so ordered. Good luck, mister Singh.
Thank you.
Thank you very much, committee. Thank you very much, madam, sir.
Alright. We'll
move on now to
our 02:15PM agenda item. Fanu Vishal, agent for Round Rock Petrol LLC, extended hours establishment, filling station, and dealer licenses renewal application for round round at Petro at 2242 North 12th Street. Good afternoon.
Good afternoon. Good afternoon.
If you both raise your right hand, we'll get you sworn in.
Thank you, Sonia. I'm from under the defense and penalties of perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Yes. I
guess. Thank you. Thank you. Alright. And you're mister Vishal?
Yes. My name is Vishal. So my address is 2242.
What? Let me just ask you. Are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied? Yes. Okay. And now will you state your name and address for the record?
My name is Vishal, f n g Vishal, and the address is 2242 North 12th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Okay. Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds.
Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
On 03/2625 at 10:16PM, officers were dispatched to an armed robbery. The victim was approached inside of the business by two masked armed suspects. The suspects demanded and took the victim's gun, jewelry, and wallet. Security video footage was available of the incident. On 05/1325 at 07:54PM, officers conducted a business check. An employee stated they were having problem with loitering, but then I know how the manager wanted it handled. No violations observed. On 06/1625 at 10:38PM, officers were dispatched to welfare check. An intoxicated subject was found lying on the ground near the door. Monkey Fire Department provided medical attention and the subject was transported to a local hospital.
No police services were needed. On 08/03/2025 at 05:05PM, officers were dispatched to a property damage complaint. Security camera footage showed an unknown subject strike a window with a rock. On 08/2025 at 09:40AM, officers were dispatched to a theft complaint. The caller reported a subject that comes to the business steals merchandise and lawyers. The business was in the process obtaining a restraint order. No business violations were observed. On 10/1925 at 09:34PM, also they're dispatched to robbery complaint. Security cameras footage showed an unknown suspect take property from the victim and strike them in the head with a gun.
Alright. Thank you. Would you like to speak to the police report?
Yes, sir. Yes, ma'am. Go ahead. At Louvio, I saw the video item number one. I added some more, like, I go same ahead and
car. I know. Three, the intoxicated guy, it's came from actually, it's a two rehabilitation centers like my my gas station. One is East side and one is the North side. So maybe sometime they come from other side.
They already intoxicated when he approachable air front of the store. So we just talk with the customer, and he called up 911 to help you. And item number four, the lady actually, the lady arrived at the gas station by walking and started to fight with the customer. Maybe they know each other. So after he left, lady started as lovely and throw the rocks and pick up the big cane from the somewhere else and throw the window, broken the windows, and start the broken the pumps.
And for the customer safety, we call the cops. And number five, Shammaji Anderson. He's aggressive, so we officer. Officer. Officer.
Unfortunately, it's a darkness a over there. Lights are not working. So we already added the six new LED. It's 300 kilowatt lights by the canopies. So it's more lightning over there.
Okay. And I'm sorry. I didn't.
2242 North Wall Street.
Property owner.
Very good. Nice to see
Alright. Questions on the police report from committee members? Questions on oh, go ahead, elder Wimpert.
So, you're you put in lights after the incident?
Yes. Okay. Yep.
Thank you.
Right. LED lights, right? Yep. Lights. Okay. Alright. Anything further, elder Wimpert?
Does the, you have cameras as well? Yes. And they capture.
I already added the five more new cameras inside the store.
Some, the cameras capture the outside as well. Okay. Thank you.
Alright, Alderman Stamper. Any questions on the police report?
Yeah. Thank you. And thank you for those questions, Alderman. That's was what going through. Confirm. But hey, what what is the security detail like?
So maybe mostly, I am engaged with the customers. So
he Alderman Stamper, he so Vishal is a daily involvement of business. So he's there every single day. Sometime he leave around 3AM. So it's a day to day involvement from him and he reach anything goes wrong like he reach out to customer like nice way to handle all the situation and also he's very involved with the committee community also.
So no. Do you have security?
Yeah. No, sir. Because like I said, he is mostly involved by himself daily day to day and he nicely, you know, handle all that.
Okay.
If you will let if you even check the previous
What is the what are what are the hours again?
It's a it's a twenty four hour, sir. But previous years also there's no issue from our side. It's happened because normal basically what happened that new rehab center open on like south of the area and from there we had low issue but it took a little long like little time to understand how to handle the situation. So after that if you look at the record after the August we don't have anything any issue. So it it take a little time to handle that.
Okay. Yep. Okay. Alright. Let's monitor this situation. I I'll support a warning letter.
Thank you.
Okay. Are there any neighbors present that we should testify on this item today? Okay. Let the record reflect there are no neighbors present to testify. I know we just heard from the alder. Would the committee like to make a motion at this time?
Madam Chair.
Alderman Brower.
Yeah. Move to approve and he wanted a warning letter, right?
Yes. Move to
approve a warning letter.
Alderman Alex Brower moves for approval with a warning letter. Any discussion? Any objection? Hearing none so ordered.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
You. Good luck to
you. Take care.
Alright. We will move now to our 02:20PM agenda item. Singh, agent for North Avenue LLC, class a fermented malt, food dealer, and weights and measures licenses renewal application for Gulst Foods at 1622 West North Avenue. Is Singh present? Gurdiv Singh. Alright. Is this his first time on appearance? Yes. Okay. Alderman Stamper, have you heard from the applicant?
I have not. I have not heard from constituents but not the actual applicant. So we can hold this to the next cycle.
Okay. Very good. Alderman Alex Bauer moves to hold this item to the hall call the chair in here. No objection so ordered. Just wanted you didn't have were there any neighbors present that were expecting to testify on Golf Foods on North Avenue? No. Okay. It doesn't look like there were any neighbors present either, Alderman Stampers. So that's good.
Okay. Good. Good.
Okay. So we'll move on to our 02:25PM agenda item. Jason W. Pachowski, for Always Towing and Recovery Inc, recycling, salvaging, and towing premises license renewal application for Always Towing and Recovering and Recovery at 1511 North 31st Street. Alright. Good afternoon, attorney.
Good afternoon, madam chairman. Attorney Michael Maiselin on behalf of Jason Bahowski and Always Towing. I'm not sure if Jason's on the board or not.
Okay.
Initially. Everybody
else. Yes, I see him.
Okay. In initially.
Everybody else is there.
Of fact.
Initially Yes. Attorney, I'm sorry.
We were under the impression that this is gonna be on the consent agenda. We were working with the alderman, but then somebody submitted an objection, and that's why we're here. Base because of that, they had to go out of town not knowing that they thought we were on
the consent agenda. Madam chair. Madam chair.
Okay. Understood. Yes, Alderman Stamper?
Mike, that's unnecessary. You don't have to say all
of that. Okay. Sorry.
Okay. Alright. That's that's fine. Let's see. Alright. I see Jason on the board. Is Melissa there? Is that Melissa that I see with him too? Hello. Alright. Good afternoon.
You're muted. You're muted.
Would you two Hello. There. Do you wanna raise your right hand and I'll get you guys both sworn in?
Do you wanna ask if everybody else
Are you are other people gonna testify today that that are here with you, Jason and Melissa?
Only if necessary, no. So
Why don't we have everybody on mute that's here for always towing and raise your right hand and we can get everybody sworn in at once just in case folks want to offer testimony. Go ahead and unmute and raise your right hand. We'll get you all sworn in.
Take the names like this rain? Yeah.
Not no. Not when they
Yeah. Yeah.
Want me to name try to name? Not all of them have a name up there. But I see well, Jason and Melissa, the owners, and then Corey always towing.
I'm doing the
whole thing. If they end up speaking, we'll confirm that they
Alright. Just everyone unmute. Raise your right hand. And we're gonna get you sworn in. Here we go.
It's only from the defense and penalties of burgeoning of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
I do. Yes. I
Good. Okay. Thank you. You, everyone. Okay. Okay. Jason, are you in receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
I am. Okay.
Thank you. And will you please state your name and address for the record?
Jason Piyhowski. 3700 West Wells, Wisconsin 53208.
Thank you. Alright. Why don't we have Melissa as well? Melissa, will you state your name and address for the record? Melissa Deleoni, always towing. 3700 West Wall Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53208. Thank you. Alright. And I know you're here well represented by counsel Maystellman. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds.
Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
No police reports, madam chair.
Alright. Yes. Attorney Maystellman.
I I believe there's only one reason we're here and that's because somebody filed a complaint stating that D2T towing company works with Always.
That's alright.
The D2T, I shut them down. I testified against them. So, I don't know why somebody's claiming they work with Always and many of you have have met Jason and Melissa before, have toured their facility. I mean, I that's the only reason we're here.
Okay. Madam Chair. Right. And I know Alderman Pratt also wants to add some remarks. Sure. Alderman Pratt?
I did have a question because when I was looking at the objection, it does reference d t t d t two towing. But then also in the body of the message, they talk about the business operating within District 1, which would would have been DT2 towing not always towing. So I'm not sure if this letter that's attached is referring to which tow company they're talking about.
This is one
of Because it talks about being in the 1st District which would have been the other tow company.
I'm not sure. Yes. And this is one of the problems that, you know, we've discussed. Every towing company is the same towing company to the public. And so if somebody like D2T does something wrong, they'll blame other towing companies. Again, I was here. I testified to shut D2T company down. Jason and Melissa would be upset with me if I shut down somebody that was working with them.
Okay. Alright. Questions for attorney Maiselman from committee members at this time? Questions from Alderman Stamper for attorney Maiselman?
No questions.
Okay. We already have a motion on the floor for approval. Is that right? Alderman Alderman Jackson? But well, let us see before we take up your motion. I appreciate that. And let us see if there's anybody here who would like to testify on this application. I'll start with, is there anybody here against this application who would like to testify today? Wanna give you some time to offer that testimony. Is there anybody here against this application today for Always Towing and Recovery Inc?
Alright. Let the record reflect. It appears unless you tell me now, I'm there's nobody here who would wish to testify against the application for always towing.
Alright. Madam chair?
Yes, attorney Mason.
I don't think it's necessary unless Jason and Melissa want all of these people to testify on our behalf because there's a motion on the table to approve us anyway.
Right. So I I would think so. Does that sound good to you, Jason? I I do note lots of support on the board. I see some All 20. Beautiful faces there. I can tell they're all here. Is everybody here in support of Always Towing? Yes. Yes. I know many people Yes. Right. Was that everybody?
You are here,
but she didn't Everyone talk to
is here in support of Always Towing. You want to raise your hand or just simply say yes.
Yes. Yes.
Okay. Yes. Alright. We note that and I think that we will move on from there. We do already have a motion from Alderman Deandre Jackson for approval but before we do that, we are in the 15th Aldermanic District. So, I want to go to Alderman Russell Stamper. Stamper.
Yes. We are in the 15th Automatic District. Thank you, madam chair. Thank you always, Tony, for being a attentive and good business operator. I have no objections. I support an approval. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you, Alderman Stamper. Thank you.
Thank you.
Alright. Well, with that, we're gonna head into committee and we already have a motion on the table from Alderman DeAndre Jackson for approval. Any further discussion on that motion? Is there any objection to that motion? Hearing none, so ordered. Thank you everyone and good luck always towing.
Thanks a lot. I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I hate to disappoint everybody but this is my last hearing today.
Thank you.
So no need to see me again. Alright.
Appreciate you guys. And attorney Mason, it's been lovely regards. To have you here in the room with us all day today.
It's it's been my pleasure.
Yes. Thank you.
Thank you.
Bye bye. Bye now.
We will. Bye.
Have a
great day. You too. On to our last but not least. Moving on to our third 02:35PM agenda item. Julian L. Nelson, agent for Julian's Hall and Lounge Class B Tavern and Public Entertainment Premises Licenses Renewal Applications for Julian's Hall and Lounge at 2125 West North Avenue. Good afternoon, Mr. Nelson.
Good afternoon.
Thank you so much for your patience. I know we're running behind.
Oh, it's okay.
Thank you. Alright. If you want to raise your right hand, we'll get you sworn in.
The use only from an independent plaintiff's perjury of the state of Wisconsin that the testimony about to give is the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
I do.
Thank you.
Alright. Alright. Mister Nelson, are you on receipt of notice of today's meeting with the possibility your application may be denied?
Correct.
Alright. And will you state your name and address for the record?
Nelson. 5703 North 55th Place, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53218.
Thank you. Alright. Miss Lopez, are there any holds?
No holds.
Okay. Sergeant Cornejo, is there a police report?
On 01/2126 at 11:40PM, Milwaukee police were dispatched to a subject with a weapon at twenty one twenty five West North Avenue. On arrival, officers observed a large group of minors blocking the front entrance door. Investigation revealed the business was halting an underage party when a fight broke out. A victim was interviewed who had a an active bleeding laceration above their eye and blood covering their face, arms, and hand, and shirt. The victim refused medical treatments and to stay on scene.
A security guard was interviewed who was pepper sprayed while trying to break up the fight. The officer observed approximately 10 liquor bottles on the shelf behind the bar and the agent was not able to produce the current business license. The agent denied selling any alcohol to minors. Due to the severity of the call, 10 squads were dispatched and responded to assist. The agent was cited for allow underage on premise and display of liquor license required. Pretrial is scheduled for 06/01/2026 at 08:30AM.
Was there any deal or involvement?
Okay. When when is that pretrial date again, sergeant?
Second first. I'm sorry.
Okay June because it says March and the but it's actually. That was okay.
It's an arraignment and now it's scheduled for pretrial. Okay.
June 1.
Yeah I pleaded not guilty so they they gave me another court date.
Okay. So is this one okay. Is this one that should be held open, attorney Gresham, or kind of up to us what we want to do It
is up to you. This I'm not going make a determination as to the materiality, but as you can see, it's pretty evident that the charge itself is pretty material to the license being sought here.
Yeah.
However, a disposition is just generally stronger, than a charge. A charge is something that the committee can consider. So it doesn't have to be a completely, pled out, determined thing, most especially if it's it has that nexus between the license and the charge. However, the determination is ultimately always yours. So if you feel as though, you know, these circumstances may warrant further deliberation by a different fact finding body and then you can just kind of copy their work, you could do that.
You could hold it open, grant as you see fit, either provisional or otherwise, and then kind of bring it back on an annual on its annual cycle. Or alternatively, you can find that there is an excess here as the charge kind of clearly indicates. Again, terms of my editorial editorializing or my opinion here, you would be finding that there is a materiality material nexus, I guess, between the charge and the license sought. And then you kind of get into the deliberation. The problem being, you know, if it's later found that, you know, everyone's innocent and this was just a charge that there's, you know, punishment without that kind of fact finding or without the robust fact finding.
However, again, you can consider charges.
Right.
on. So this is it's up to us. No, not yet. Not yet. So you will in a moment. So it's up to us. We can take it up or we cannot take it up. So let me let me just let the local alder weigh in to see what he would like to do. Alderman Stamper?
Yeah. Thank you, madam chair. I would like to hear from the applicants, especially since he's saying he was he was not guilty. So I'd like to hear from him.
Okay. So so then we are gonna go ahead. I'm hearing the local alder say you'd like to discuss, so we are gonna move forward. Yes. Mister Nelson, we'd like would you like to speak to the police report?
Yes. I will. One one more one more thing, madam. When does his license expire? When is it up?
It's expired already. They have a provisional. The provisional expires on May 30.
Okay.
May 30. So that's that's prior to the court date?
Correct.
Okay. Thank you, madam chair.
Yes. Alright. Now, mister Nelson, please go ahead and speak to the police report.
Okay. So, the reason why I pleaded not guilty to this situation is because I am I am a banquet hall, and I, when I was getting my license, they did give me some information to let me know that I am not restricted to any age as long as there is parents there. And there were a lot of parents there. There was a dance competition that got out of control with, you know, some unhappy people and the teenage the situation that happened outside, teenagers calling other teenagers, and that's how that situation grew out of control. We had a lot of security there for this dance competition.
And when the situation happened, it was so much going on that when the officer asked me about the license, I went to the license, but it was it it it was so many fights happening even in the situation where I have my security, even myself. I was trying to clear the building, but it was so many kids coming outside, you know, trying to get in, which we had the situation under control, but we had it it was it was a situation where people were at the door trying to get in on on top of the fights while the police were in, you know, outside of the venue. So basically, the situation kinda got out of control, which stopped me from, you know, and I and I I I opened this up for teenagers because I see so much crazy activity with teenagers. And, you know, I feel bad for some kids that are positive kids. But this this this situation, this this event started out so great.
And twenty minutes before, you know, we were leaving, that's when the incident happened. These kids actually were 24 years old, 22 years old, but there were kids that, you know, was part of the competition. No liquor was served. I I mostly bought sodas and waters. So that's why I pleaded not guilty because I'm not on a age restriction.
And also, I I got a ticket for not displaying, which I found the paperwork. It was just it was I don't know if they bumped like, I have the the the paperwork is near the service bar, so I don't know if it between breaking up a fight. The the paper was floating on the ground, like crumbled and crushed up. So I have all of the proof of everything for those two tickets, so I will be fighting those. And that's all I can say.
Okay. Alright. I don't know if city attorney wants to confirm this or if license division can, but he is correct at a hall. He can have underage people present at an event, correct?
I mean, could have underage people with their parents at a bar. So, I mean, there's Where's it going? Where's see though? Yeah, there are provisions within Wisconsin that allow for that. I I don't wanna speak to whether or not it's allowable or not here in this instance or in the instance that's alleged. But there are provisions in state law that allow for, minors to attend, you know, places that serve alcohol. Alcohol.
Right.
I don't want to again, I don't want to opine as to the specific one because, again, he's being cited and charged by our office. So I'm leaving this as broad as possible.
Okay. I do want to note, though, Mr. Nelson, in the extended report, I'm hearing you say there were certainly adults present that there were parents there at the event as well but it does say in the more detailed police report that police indicate that there were no parents present.
About time that the police got there, it was actually a parent that called the police even if they checked the record. It was a it was a parent, the mother of the son who called the police. So otherwise, we we wouldn't even have the police even show. There was a lot of parents there. It's just one one thing that happens when these type of situation happen, parents don't deal with bull crap like this.
So they're out the door. So they left me and my security to figure everything out. So by the time the police came, they came late, extremely late, you know, to the situation. The mother was almost the last person, and she was speaking to the police officers and letting them know that this was her son event, and it just got too out of control.
And the parents, do they leave? Do they take their children with them, or they just just?
Yes. Yes. The building was almost empty by the time the police got there. It was maybe. Maybe twenty twenty people there, you know, and but the the ones that was there with their children, they don't involved in, you know, these these out of control teams. So.
Okay.
Of course, they left.
Alright. And then, so, I have another question for either the city attorney or or MPD. In the report, in the extended report, it talks about hard liquor bottles being on the shelf in open view. What's the problem with that? He's got a alcohol license. That's not a is that a violation? Is he supposed to remove them because there's young people in the at the event? It just doesn't seem conducive as because of the type of business, but wanted to ask you.
Yeah. I'd have to follow-up with the officers, and review the plan of operation. Obviously, if he does have the banquet hall there, you know, like, attorney Gresham already stated there might be some different provisions that would allow him to, but I the officers may have not observed I mean, sounds like he didn't have a license posted, so they might not have been aware of Okay. What the situation did or did not allow the applicant.
Okay. But normally, it's totally acceptable for him to have a shelf behind the bar with bottles. Alright. Thank you. Further questions from committee members on the police report? Questions from Alderman Stamper on the police report.
Yeah. Thank you. This is only incident on the police report?
Yes. That's what I'm showing.
Alright. Correct?
Yes. And how long how
long have
you been
there? Remind me how long you've been there?
I've been there eight years when I want this is my first incident.
Yeah. Yeah. This is his first incident. I'm aware of that situation. He tries to do things for the youth. He's very active in the neighborhood. I'm proud of him that he has a business over there, and I'm gonna support him. I just wanna ask him, what is he gonna do next time to prevent something like this from happening?
Well, I don't plan on doing any more teen events and which it it it's actually a bad situation because, you know, this messes it up for the good teens, and this is why, you know, we're having a hard time. You know, the city is having a hard time finding things to do with teams because they're just too out of control. The this was a good situation that turned bad twenty minutes before we were shutting it down. So unfortunately, we can't. I don't wanna do anything with anybody under 25. So I've been denying proms, proms send offs. I've I've denied
not sure sure I'm not
a mishap this time due to youth young people. Sure And I have no objections.
Okay. Thank you.
Approval.
Alderman Alex Brower moves approval. Any discussion on that motion? Any objection? Hearing none so ordered. Good luck to you, mister Nelson.
Thank you so much. Thank you, Alderman.
Alright. Alright. Yes. Welcome.
I'll see you soon.
Give me a call.
Thank you, guys.
Thank you.
Hey, Julian.
Alderwoman Andrea Pratt moves to approve the following agenda only items beginning with Barry Gebrick, agent for Nationwide Recovery Incorporated Recycling Salvaging. Our towing vehicle license transfer transfer application adding one vehicle total of 12 for Nationwide Recovery Incorporated and concluding with Javed I Mohammad, agent for American Sub Inc extended hours establishments and food dealer licenses renewal application with removing security guard from the plan of operations for American Sub at 1114 West North Avenue. And hearing no objection to that motion so ordered. Yeah. That's right.
Alright. Alderman Alex Brower moves to approve the following warning letters beginning with Lokish Dasari, agent for Villard Pump and Pantry Inc extended hours establishments filling station food dealer, and weights and measures, licenses, renewal application with for Villard Pump and Pantry at 4105 West Villard Avenue. And concluding with oh, okay. Jose Zaragoza, agent for J and E Grocery Store LLC, class A fermented malt and food dealer license licenses renewal application for La Cienda at 820 South Cesare Chavez Drive. And hearing no objection to that motion so ordered.
Alderman Peter Berglis moves to approve as amended. File number 252234 and hearing no objection to that motion so ordered. Alderman Andrea Pratt moves to place on file. File number 201619. An ordinance relating to the sale of intoxicating liquor by the glass for consumption away from licensed premises. And hearing no objection to that motion to place on file so ordered. Very good. Having no further business before us, the licenses committee is adjourned. Thank you, everyone. Thank you.
Thank you, madam chair.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.